Hi,
I wonder why records on the system.paxos table aren't removed, though all
records are updated with TTL (at least 3 hours).
That's because gc_grace_seconds of system.paxos table is always 0 and users
can't change that value of System keyspace!
Why is the TTL of paxos record invalidated?
Or,
https://status.apache.org/
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/53e9cf7ded15f2e348be2fd36a11fd3aa4dc43462d6aa5a197dbd337@%3Cbuilds.apache.org%3E
--
Kind regards,
Michael
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Agreed here - combining effort and making things pluggable seems like a good
solution
--
Jeff Jirsa
On Aug 28, 2018, at 11:44 PM, Vinay Chella wrote:
>> I haven’t settled on a position yet (will have more time think about
> things after the 9/1 freeze), but I wanted to point out that the
2c: There's a lot to think about here, and as Blake already mentioned most
people don't have time to dedicate a lot of thought to this at the moment.
There appear to be a lot of voices missing from the discussion, and I think
it's pretty clear this isn't super tied to the freeze, so maybe we
> I haven’t settled on a position yet (will have more time think about
things after the 9/1 freeze), but I wanted to point out that the argument
that something new should be written because an existing project has tech
debt, and we'll do it the right way this time, is a pretty common software
I am excited to see that the community is working on solving the critical
problems in C* operations (e.g., repair, backups etc.,) with different
solutions. Of course, learnings from these systems are key to designing the
robust solution which works for everyone.
Thanks,
Vinay Chella
On Tue,
