Re: QA signup

2018-09-19 Thread kurt greaves
It's pretty much only third party plugins. I need it for the LDAP authenticator, and StratIO's lucene plugin will also need it. I know there are users out there with their own custom plugins that would benefit from it as well (and various other open source projects). It would make it easier,

Re: QA signup

2018-09-19 Thread Mick Semb Wever
Sorry about the terrible english in my last email. > On the target audience: > > [snip] > For developers building automation around testing and > validation, it’d be great to have a common build to work from rather > than each developer producing these builds themselves. Sure. My question

Measuring Release Quality

2018-09-19 Thread Scott Andreas
Hi everyone, Now that many teams have begun testing and validating Apache Cassandra 4.0, it’s useful to think about what “progress” looks like. While metrics alone may not tell us what “done” means, they do help us answer the question, “are we getting better or worse — and how quickly”? A

Re: QA signup

2018-09-19 Thread Jonathan Haddad
It seems to me that improving / simplifying the process of building the packages might solve this problem better. For example, in the tests you linked to, they were using a custom build that hadn't been rolled into trunk. I expect we're going to see a lot of that. If we make building a deb

Re: QA signup

2018-09-19 Thread Scott Andreas
Got it, thanks! On the target audience: This would primarily be C* developers who are working on development, testing, and validation of the release. The performance testing exercise Joey, Vinay, Sumanth, Jason, Jordan, and Dinesh completed yesterday is a good example [1]. For developers