> Of course, if we remove Priority from the Bug type, I agree with others
> that the top level priority ceases to mean anything, and there probably
> shouldn’t be one.
Benedict, another idea, and this might be for down the road, is to have
"Severity" or bug types and "Impact" on non-bug types. Removing everywhere the
need for a subjective Priority field. Such an "Impact" field would permit more
descriptive values for improvements and features. We can also add some
documentation as to what qualifies for the different values to both Severity
and Impact.
And on the topic of Feature types, what are people's thoughts on the "Cassandra
improvement Proposal" written up at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=95652201
If we agree on this then can we have a (mandatory) field on Feature for the
CIP? If people are entering requests for new Features then shouldn't they also
be willing to do some homework and write up a CIP?
regards,
Mick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cassandra.apache.org
