Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.16 - SECOND ATTEMPT

2023-08-16 Thread Tommy Stendahl via dev
+1 nb -Original Message- From: Brandon Williams mailto:brandon%20williams%20%3cdri...@gmail.com%3e>> Reply-To: dev@cassandra.apache.org To: dev@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.16 -

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.16

2023-08-16 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 Kind Regards, Brandon On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 4:34 PM Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.16 for release. > > Repository: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git > > Candidate SHA: >

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.16

2023-08-16 Thread Francisco Guerrero
+1 (nb), thank you! On 2023/08/16 22:23:52 Doug Rohrer wrote: > +1 (nb) - Thanks Dinesh! > > Doug > > > On Aug 16, 2023, at 5:34 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > > > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.16 for release. > > > > Repository: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-18743 Deprecation of metrics-reporter-config

2023-08-16 Thread Doug Rohrer
My only concern about removal in 5.1 would be that removing it in a “minor” release would really be a breaking change, and semver says that should happen in a major version. If we really want to be semver compliant, it shouldn’t be removed until 6.0 (or, if we remove it in the next release, we

Re: [VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.16

2023-08-16 Thread Doug Rohrer
+1 (nb) - Thanks Dinesh! Doug > On Aug 16, 2023, at 5:34 PM, Dinesh Joshi wrote: > > Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.16 for release. > > Repository: > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git > > Candidate SHA: >

[VOTE] Release dtest-api 0.0.16

2023-08-16 Thread Dinesh Joshi
Proposing the test build of in-jvm dtest API 0.0.16 for release. Repository: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api.git Candidate SHA: https://github.com/apache/cassandra-in-jvm-dtest-api/commit/1ba6ef93d0721741b5f6d6d72cba3da03fe78438 tagged with 0.0.16 Artifacts:

[Discuss] Detecting token-ownership mismatch

2023-08-16 Thread Jaydeep Chovatia
Hi, As we know, Cassandra exchanges important topology and token-ownership-related details over Gossip. Cassandra internally maintains the following two separate caches that have the token-ownership information maintained: 1) Gossip cache and 2) Storage Service cache. The first Gossip cache is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.16 - SECOND ATTEMPT

2023-08-16 Thread Maxim Muzafarov
+1 (nb) verified checksums, signing, and build from sources. The link is broken :-( Maven Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecassandra-1306/org/apache/cassandra/cassandra-all/3.11.16/ On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 19:18, Brandon Williams wrote: > > +1 > > Kind

Re: [DISCUSS] CASSANDRA-18743 Deprecation of metrics-reporter-config

2023-08-16 Thread Abe Ratnofsky
There's consensus here to deprecate metrics-reporter-config in 5.0. Is there any objection to removing it in 5.1? > On Aug 11, 2023, at 10:01 AM, Maxim Muzafarov wrote: > > +1 > > The rationale for deprecating/removing this library is not just that > it is obsolete and doesn't get updates. In

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.16 - SECOND ATTEMPT

2023-08-16 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 Kind Regards, Brandon On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:53 PM Miklosovic, Stefan wrote: > > This is the second attempt to pass the vote after [1] is fixed. > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.16 for release. > > sha1: 681b6ca103d91d940a9fecb8cd812f58dd2490d0 > Git:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.16 - SECOND ATTEMPT

2023-08-16 Thread Alex Petrov
+1 On Tue, Aug 15, 2023, at 7:53 PM, Miklosovic, Stefan wrote: > This is the second attempt to pass the vote after [1] is fixed. > > Proposing the test build of Cassandra 3.11.16 for release. > > sha1: 681b6ca103d91d940a9fecb8cd812f58dd2490d0 > Git:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 3.11.16 - SECOND ATTEMPT

2023-08-16 Thread Mick Semb Wever
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours (longer if needed). Everyone who has > tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered > binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and no -1's. > +1 Checked - signing correct - checksums are correct - source