Is it possible to add CASANDRA-5155 to 1.1.9? The patch and it's impact is
rather small. Otherwise, +1
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Gary Dusbabek gdusba...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com
wrote:
We've fixed our fair share of
Yep, already doing that :). Just wanted to jettison my variant as soon as
possibile. I can wait, though, not a problem.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Jason Brown jasedbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to add
the hints
to a peer (in the same rack?).
Thanks,
-Jason Brown
Netflix
+1
On Dec 29, 2012 9:31 AM, Vijay vijay2...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Regards,
/VJ
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com
wrote:
After a quiet 2nd release candidate, it is time to release the final
1.2.0.
I thus propose the following artifacts for release
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Carl Yeksigian c...@yeksigian.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com
wrote:
There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably
+1
On Dec 17, 2012 8:57 AM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 3:28 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com
wrote:
We've fixed a few annoying issue since 1.1.7 so I propose the following
artifacts for release as 1.1.8.
sha1:
AM, Jason Brown jasedbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
I'm in favor of paying off the technical debt, as well, and I wonder if
there is value in removing support for thrift with 2.0? We're currently
in
'do as little as possible' mode with thrift, so should we aggressively
cast
it off
Oops, meant to address this specifically to Jonathan, but since I've
confused 'reply' with 'forward'. my apologies for any extra noise on this
topic.
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Jason Brown jasedbr...@gmail.com wrote:
- world
Hi Jonathan,
This topic may have been discussed elsewhere
Sylvain,
Thanks for the feedback! You're probably right about the RIE, but as this
is my first 'really deep' ticket into the bowels of c*, I'm learning the
role/purpose of everything as I'm going. As for the WIP branch, I may take
the community up on that :).
Thanks,
-Jason
On Fri, Nov 30,
Hi Jonathan,
I'm in favor of paying off the technical debt, as well, and I wonder if
there is value in removing support for thrift with 2.0? We're currently in
'do as little as possible' mode with thrift, so should we aggressively cast
it off and push the binary CQL protocol? Seems like a jump to
My hope is that after 1.2 (i.e. by the time we're 2.0'ing), the binary CQL
protocol is out of beta :).
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
Good idea. Lets remove thrift, CQL3 is still beta, but I am willing to
upgrade to a version that removes thrift.
for your help,
-Jason Brown
Hi Sumeet,
I would be interested in talking about the opportunity. Should we have a
quick chat sometime?
Thanks
Jason Brown
Netflix
On Nov 27, 2012 7:24 AM, Sumeet Sawant sume...@packtpub.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am Sumeet Sawant, an Author Relations Executive with Packt Publishing.
We
+1
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Pavel Yaskevich pove...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
+1
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
sylv...@datastax.com(mailto:
sylv...@datastax.com)wrote:
A fair amount of
+1, as we're looking forward to leveled compaction fixes so we can jump
over to 1.1
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Sep 6, 2012 3:54 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
There is a bunch of users hitting #4571 and #4561, and besides
201 - 215 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
