r delaying the release, and to Sylvain for the extra
building effort.
Thanks,
-Jason
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Before I vote, I'd like to spend Monday running some tests and basically
> beating the snot out of the changes I made last
+1 to the newest 1.2.6 build
+1 to dtests saving the day
+1 to anybody commenting on these votes. Micheal, I'm glad you were able to
test (in prod? :) ) and verify there was indeed a problem, and for letting
the community know - and then testing the 'reverted' version.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at
+1. Woo-hoo!
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Carl Yeksigian wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > Cassandra 2.0 is coming along but we now need wider testing. So I propose
> > the
> > following artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta1. Let it be clear tha
+1
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Vijay wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a
> > new
> > beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
+1
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Murali wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Gary Dusbabek
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Sylvain Lebresne > >wrote:
> >
> > > Quite a few bugs fixed since 1.2.6, I propose the following artifacts
> for
> > > relea
+1
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> So, now with some CASSANDRA-5799 inside, I propose the following artifacts
> for
> release as 1.2.7.
>
> sha1: ce4e4b9b5b29b0e0518aafe02544de3765ea9dd7
> Git:
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=ref
+1
On Jul 27, 2013 6:33 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> > A regression made its way into 1.2.7 and has since been fixed [2]; I
> > propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.8.
> >
> > Git SHA1: 0291d696018214000709025c0b80608
+1
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Murali wrote:
> +1
>
> On Monday, August 5, 2013, Carl Yeksigian wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Sounds like it's that time; I propose the following artifacts for
> >> release as 2.0.0 rc1.
> >>
> >
+1
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > The changelog is getting big, I propose the following artifacts for
> release
> > as 1.2.9.
> >
> > sha1: ae62c947fc245295785324502bf6bc2c1c8477f9
> > Git:
>
+1
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:13 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > The RC2 period has been relatively calm so far and in term of timing,
> we're
> > way
> > late on our "regular 6 month schedule". It's time to release that final
As Aleksey just claimed 5019 :), either of the other tickets is fine.
On Sep 19, 2013 9:17 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> Those are maybe the 3 biggest ones here, how about 5019 to start with? :)
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Jason Brown
> wrote:
> > I can ta
I can take on 4175 and maybe 5019 or 6060. Please assign at will :)
On Sep 19, 2013 9:02 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> Fantastic!
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Pavel Yaskevich
> wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > I can take on first two (4817, 5863).
> >
> > Best Regards, Pavel.
> >
> >>
Seeing Sylvain's comment to hold off on 4175, do you mind if I take a whack
at 6060?
On Sep 19, 2013 9:35 AM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> Oh, I misunderstood him. 4175 is yours then!
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Jason Brown
> wrote:
> > As Aleksey ju
+1
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Pavel Yaskevich wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 5:55 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
> >
> >> Same player, try again. I propose the following artifacts for release as
> >> 2.0.1
+1
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > The changelog is getting big, I propose the following artifacts for
> release
> > as 1.2.10.
> >
> > sha1: 937536363a8a6d86ee32fe5ef90653264e67b6c7
> > Git:
> >
>
(should be): I'm happy to work on it
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Jason Brown wrote:
> Ha. I've actually been hacking that today. I'm glad to it on
> On Sep 20, 2013 1:15 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAS
Ha. I've actually been hacking that today. I'm glad to it on
On Sep 20, 2013 1:15 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1632 (Thread workflow
> and cpu affinity)
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Jonathan Ellis
> wrote:
> > I'd like to spend some effor
+1
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Cyril Scetbon wrote:
> +1
>
> and welcome to LOCAL_ONE consistency level :)
>
> NB : I don't know if I have the right to vote but as a member of the ML I
> take it :P
> --
> Cyril SCETBON
>
> On Oct 18, 2013, at 7:44 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
> > +1
> > On
+1
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > A fair number of fixes went in since 1.2.11, I propose the following
> > artifacts
> > for release as 1.2.12.
> >
> > sha1: 026865f2a36d9685057c407e3fa528c101a
013 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> To clarify, are you +1ing the vote, or "let's wait for 6374?"
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Kais Ahmed wrote:
> >
> >
+1
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Kais Ahmed wrote:
> Hi Sylvain,
>
> I don't think I have the right to vote, but I wish that this version
> includes
> the pach of CASSANDRA-6374,
> this AE will directly freeze the thread MemtablePostFlusher until the
> rebootof the
> node, I also feel that a
+1
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Gary Dusbabek wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > With now CASSANDRA-6374 included, I propose the following artifacts for
> > release as
> > 2.0.3.
> >
> > sha1: 3c9760bdb986f6c2430adfc13c86ecb75c3246ac
> > Git:
+1
On Dec 27, 2013 12:10 PM, "Jonathan Ellis" wrote:
> +1
> On Dec 27, 2013 1:25 PM, "Eric Evans" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > #6527[1] could cause data loss, so I propose the following artifacts for
> > release as 2.0.4
> >
> > Git: 2.0.4-tentative/d56f8f2
> > Gitweb:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.or
+1
On Feb 1, 2014 11:16 AM, "Gary Dusbabek" wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > sha1: 0191b359fc18ebb1efa940257729d141c26112d3
> > Git:
> >
> >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/2.0.5-tentative
> > Artifa
+1
On Feb 1, 2014 11:15 AM, "Gary Dusbabek" wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.14.
> >
> > sha1: 6a9314408cbd69ce26c2ba04bf49df7809a911bf
> > Git:
> >
> >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?
+1
fare thee well, thrift...
+1
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
wrote:
> We've fixed all the bugs we had open for 2.1 so it's time to move on
> towards
> the final release. I thus propose the following artifacts for release as
> 2.1.0-rc1.
>
> sha1: c108ce5bf2abc88077c97924def59fa1ea98a66e
> Git:
>
> http
FWIW, here's the ubuntu wiki on their release model:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimeBasedReleases
Short story: they have a feature set for each release, and it must be
tested thoroughly before going out the door. Granted, they are shipping an
entire OS with 1000s of components that all must work well
+1
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>
> > We've almost there. I propose the following artifacts for release as
> > 2.1.0-rc2.
> >
> > sha1: e2bef02e254a9c6e37a86cab957a1fcba56214fd
> > Git:
> >
> >
> http
+1
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
> On Jul 2, 2014 4:36 AM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote:
>
> > 1.2.17 shipped with a reference to a java 7 class (see CASSANDRA-7147).
> As
> > consequence, the source don't build on java 6. Regarding the binary
> > artifacts,
> > they a
+1 on more testing. TBH, I was a little scared when I found #7465 as it was
rather easy to uncover.
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Benedict Elliott Smith <
belliottsm...@datastax.com> wrote:
> Pretty sure we got this head of the hydra. Question is if any more will
> spring up in its place.
>
>
+1
On Tuesday, July 8, 2014, Jake Luciani wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >
> wrote:
>
> > Getting closer. I propose the following artifacts for release as
> 2.1.0-rc3.
> > Also, unless
> > someone has an objection, I'm also proposing to exceptionally do a
> s
n
replacement, it may require code changes), you can open a jira (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA/) to request the work. That
being said, I'm not sure if it's too late for the 2.1 train to make that
change.
Hope that helps,
-Jason Brown
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at
+1
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.1.0-rc4
> >
> > Git: 2.1.0-rc4-tentative/d872e2c
> > Gitweb:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache
+1
On Saturday, August 2, 2014, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >
> wrote:
>
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.1.0-rc5. Unless
> someone
> > strongly
> > object, we'll keep the vote period for this one to 24h.
> >
> > sha1
+1
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Brandon Williams wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>
> > We've solved all outstanding tickets for 2.1.0, but the number of fixes
> > since
> > rc6 is a bit big, so I propose the following artifacts for release as
>
+1
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Josh McKenzie
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>
> > We have no outstanding tickets open and tests are in the green, so I
> > propose
> > the following artifacts for release as 2.1.0.
> >
> > sha1: c6a2c65a75adea9a62896
+1
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Mikhail Stepura <
> mikhail.step...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On 9/12/14 10:16, Jake Luciani wrote:
> >
> >> I propose the following artifacts for release as 1.2.19. This will
+1
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.0.11.
> >
> > sha1: 3c8a2a7660f156c41260019965d9e345d934eb01
> > Git:
> >
> >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/rep
+1
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jake Luciani wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tuesday, October 21, 2014, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>
> > I propose the following artifacts for release as 2.1.1.
> >
> > sha1: 3261d5e668f341464fc322b6bc424b33ce3adffd
> > Git:
> >
> >
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
+1 to this general proposal. I think the time has finally come for us to
try something new, and this sounds legit. Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Phil Yang wrote:
> Can I regard the odd version as the "development preview" and the even
> version as the "production ready"?
>
> IMO, as
ssive so they have their work cut out for them.
> > >
> > > It's going to be an iterative process where the tests improve as new
> work
> > > introduces missing coverage and as bugs/regressions drive the
> > introduction
> > > of new tests. The month
201 - 242 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
