Re: Review ApacheCon Cassandra track submissions
Yep, misspoke on my part. Committer volunteers, pmc required was what I poorly failed to articulate. On Tue, May 21, 2019, 9:43 AM Nate McCall wrote: > Apologies if I wasn’t clear. The intention was pmc and committers. I would > be inclined to open it further but we are tied into the ASFs review system > for which you need an ASF account. (If someone had commit access on another > project and wanted to participate , I’d be cool with that). > > On Tuesday, May 21, 2019, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > > > Re-reading that, I realize I probably need to clarify: > > > > 1) Entire PMC *+ anyone else who wants to volunteer* vote on talks. Not > > just PMC. > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:48 AM Joshua McKenzie > > wrote: > > > > > 1) How about we have entire PMC vote on talks? > > > 2) We need to do t-shirts. :) Do we need corporate sponsorship for that > > > (i.e. $$)? I can look into that if so. > > > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:28 AM Nate McCall > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Folks, > > >> As you probably know, the ApacheCon NA CFP recently closed. We > received > > *a > > >> lot* of submissions for the Cassandra track (thanks everyone!!!). 3x > > more > > >> than any other project specific track and *almost* as much as the > > >> catch-all > > >> big data track. > > >> > > >> Not only that, but there are a lot of good ones in there. To > accommodate > > >> this, we added another user-focused day (bringing us to 1 day of NGCC > > and > > >> 2 > > >> days of talks) as well as another room. We'll be able to take 19 user > > >> talks > > >> and 9 NGCC talks. > > >> > > >> If you are a committer (or by extension a PMC member) and you want to > > help > > >> grade talks, please let me know by replying to this email and we'll > get > > >> you > > >> setup. More instructions will follow once we get a head count. As we > > need > > >> to get started, I'll cap the number of people to whoever has replied > > >> within > > >> 72 hours of sending this email. > > >> > > >> Thanks again to everyone that submitted abstracts! I can't tell you > how > > >> happy we were to see the response once we got access to the > submissions. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> -Nate > > >> > > > > > >
Re: Review ApacheCon Cassandra track submissions
Apologies if I wasn’t clear. The intention was pmc and committers. I would be inclined to open it further but we are tied into the ASFs review system for which you need an ASF account. (If someone had commit access on another project and wanted to participate , I’d be cool with that). On Tuesday, May 21, 2019, Joshua McKenzie wrote: > Re-reading that, I realize I probably need to clarify: > > 1) Entire PMC *+ anyone else who wants to volunteer* vote on talks. Not > just PMC. > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:48 AM Joshua McKenzie > wrote: > > > 1) How about we have entire PMC vote on talks? > > 2) We need to do t-shirts. :) Do we need corporate sponsorship for that > > (i.e. $$)? I can look into that if so. > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:28 AM Nate McCall wrote: > > > >> Hi Folks, > >> As you probably know, the ApacheCon NA CFP recently closed. We received > *a > >> lot* of submissions for the Cassandra track (thanks everyone!!!). 3x > more > >> than any other project specific track and *almost* as much as the > >> catch-all > >> big data track. > >> > >> Not only that, but there are a lot of good ones in there. To accommodate > >> this, we added another user-focused day (bringing us to 1 day of NGCC > and > >> 2 > >> days of talks) as well as another room. We'll be able to take 19 user > >> talks > >> and 9 NGCC talks. > >> > >> If you are a committer (or by extension a PMC member) and you want to > help > >> grade talks, please let me know by replying to this email and we'll get > >> you > >> setup. More instructions will follow once we get a head count. As we > need > >> to get started, I'll cap the number of people to whoever has replied > >> within > >> 72 hours of sending this email. > >> > >> Thanks again to everyone that submitted abstracts! I can't tell you how > >> happy we were to see the response once we got access to the submissions. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> -Nate > >> > > >
Re: Review ApacheCon Cassandra track submissions
Re-reading that, I realize I probably need to clarify: 1) Entire PMC *+ anyone else who wants to volunteer* vote on talks. Not just PMC. On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 8:48 AM Joshua McKenzie wrote: > 1) How about we have entire PMC vote on talks? > 2) We need to do t-shirts. :) Do we need corporate sponsorship for that > (i.e. $$)? I can look into that if so. > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:28 AM Nate McCall wrote: > >> Hi Folks, >> As you probably know, the ApacheCon NA CFP recently closed. We received *a >> lot* of submissions for the Cassandra track (thanks everyone!!!). 3x more >> than any other project specific track and *almost* as much as the >> catch-all >> big data track. >> >> Not only that, but there are a lot of good ones in there. To accommodate >> this, we added another user-focused day (bringing us to 1 day of NGCC and >> 2 >> days of talks) as well as another room. We'll be able to take 19 user >> talks >> and 9 NGCC talks. >> >> If you are a committer (or by extension a PMC member) and you want to help >> grade talks, please let me know by replying to this email and we'll get >> you >> setup. More instructions will follow once we get a head count. As we need >> to get started, I'll cap the number of people to whoever has replied >> within >> 72 hours of sending this email. >> >> Thanks again to everyone that submitted abstracts! I can't tell you how >> happy we were to see the response once we got access to the submissions. >> >> Cheers, >> -Nate >> >
Re: Review ApacheCon Cassandra track submissions
1) How about we have entire PMC vote on talks? 2) We need to do t-shirts. :) Do we need corporate sponsorship for that (i.e. $$)? I can look into that if so. On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:28 AM Nate McCall wrote: > Hi Folks, > As you probably know, the ApacheCon NA CFP recently closed. We received *a > lot* of submissions for the Cassandra track (thanks everyone!!!). 3x more > than any other project specific track and *almost* as much as the catch-all > big data track. > > Not only that, but there are a lot of good ones in there. To accommodate > this, we added another user-focused day (bringing us to 1 day of NGCC and 2 > days of talks) as well as another room. We'll be able to take 19 user talks > and 9 NGCC talks. > > If you are a committer (or by extension a PMC member) and you want to help > grade talks, please let me know by replying to this email and we'll get you > setup. More instructions will follow once we get a head count. As we need > to get started, I'll cap the number of people to whoever has replied within > 72 hours of sending this email. > > Thanks again to everyone that submitted abstracts! I can't tell you how > happy we were to see the response once we got access to the submissions. > > Cheers, > -Nate >
Review ApacheCon Cassandra track submissions
Hi Folks, As you probably know, the ApacheCon NA CFP recently closed. We received *a lot* of submissions for the Cassandra track (thanks everyone!!!). 3x more than any other project specific track and *almost* as much as the catch-all big data track. Not only that, but there are a lot of good ones in there. To accommodate this, we added another user-focused day (bringing us to 1 day of NGCC and 2 days of talks) as well as another room. We'll be able to take 19 user talks and 9 NGCC talks. If you are a committer (or by extension a PMC member) and you want to help grade talks, please let me know by replying to this email and we'll get you setup. More instructions will follow once we get a head count. As we need to get started, I'll cap the number of people to whoever has replied within 72 hours of sending this email. Thanks again to everyone that submitted abstracts! I can't tell you how happy we were to see the response once we got access to the submissions. Cheers, -Nate
