Re: splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

2017-03-23 Thread Edward Capriolo
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo > wrote: > > I believe you could accomplish a similar goal by making a multi-module > > project

Re: splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

2017-03-23 Thread Eric Evans
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > I believe you could accomplish a similar goal by making a multi-module > project https://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-multiple-modules.html. > Probably not as easy thanks to ant, but I think that is a better

Re: splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

2017-03-22 Thread Edward Capriolo
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Anthony Grasso wrote: > This is a great idea > > +1 (non-binding) > > On 22 March 2017 at 07:04, Edward Capriolo wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Mark Dewey wrote: > > > > > I can

Re: splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

2017-03-21 Thread Anthony Grasso
This is a great idea +1 (non-binding) On 22 March 2017 at 07:04, Edward Capriolo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Mark Dewey wrote: > > > I can immediately think of a project I would use that in. +1 > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:18 PM

Re: splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

2017-03-21 Thread Mark Dewey
I can immediately think of a project I would use that in. +1 On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:18 PM Jonathan Haddad wrote: > I created CASSANDRA-13284 a few days ago with the intent of starting a > discussion around the topic of breaking the CQL parser out into a separate >

splitting CQL parser & spec into separate repo

2017-03-21 Thread Jonathan Haddad
I created CASSANDRA-13284 a few days ago with the intent of starting a discussion around the topic of breaking the CQL parser out into a separate project. I see a few benefits to doing it and was wondering what the folks here thought as well. First off, the Java CQL parser would obviously