On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 09:01 -0500, Eric Evans wrote:
> We sat on 0.6.0 for a bit longer than usual in order to coordinate
> with the press team, and in the meantime accumulated some important
> bug fixes in the 0.6 branch. I propose we move forward with an
> 0.6.1 now, and get these changes[1] out
+1
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 09:01, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> We sat on 0.6.0 for a bit longer than usual in order to coordinate
> with the press team, and in the meantime accumulated some important
> bug fixes in the 0.6 branch. I propose we move forward with an
> 0.6.1 now, and get these changes[1] o
+1
+1
Matthieu
On Thursday, April 15, 2010, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> We sat on 0.6.0 for a bit longer than usual in order to coordinate
> with the press team, and in the meantime accumulated some important
> bug fixes in the 0.6 branch. I propose we move forward with an
> 0.6.1 now, and get these chan
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
>
> We sat on 0.6.0 for a bit longer than usual in order to coordinate
> with the press team, and in the meantime accumulated some important
> bug fixes in the 0.6 branch. I propose we move forward with an
> 0.6.1 now, and get these changes[1] ou
We sat on 0.6.0 for a bit longer than usual in order to coordinate
with the press team, and in the meantime accumulated some important
bug fixes in the 0.6 branch. I propose we move forward with an
0.6.1 now, and get these changes[1] out to users.
SVN Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassand
