[VOTE RESULT] was: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.8.4

2011-08-11 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
Including myself, I count 3 binding +1's, 1 other +1 and no 0s, the vote passes. I'll get the artifacts published right away. On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Eldad Yamin wrote: > +1 >  On Aug 10, 2011 8:09 PM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote: >> We just fixed a fairly serious bug with counter (CASSAND

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.8.4

2011-08-11 Thread Eldad Yamin
+1 On Aug 10, 2011 8:09 PM, "Sylvain Lebresne" wrote: > We just fixed a fairly serious bug with counter (CASSANDRA-3006 -- it is > serious in that it "corrupt" counters). Cassandra 0.8.3 also shipped with a > potential small upgrade problem (CASSANDRA-3011). There is no reason to wait > to give t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.8.4

2011-08-10 Thread Brandon Williams
+1 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > We just fixed a fairly serious bug with counter (CASSANDRA-3006 -- it is > serious in that it "corrupt" counters). Cassandra 0.8.3 also shipped with a > potential small upgrade problem (CASSANDRA-3011). There is no reason to wait > to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.8.4

2011-08-10 Thread Jonathan Ellis
+1 On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > We just fixed a fairly serious bug with counter (CASSANDRA-3006 -- it is > serious in that it "corrupt" counters). Cassandra 0.8.3 also shipped with a > potential small upgrade problem (CASSANDRA-3011). There is no reason to wait > to

[VOTE] Release Apache Cassandra 0.8.4

2011-08-10 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
We just fixed a fairly serious bug with counter (CASSANDRA-3006 -- it is serious in that it "corrupt" counters). Cassandra 0.8.3 also shipped with a potential small upgrade problem (CASSANDRA-3011). There is no reason to wait to give those to users (especially the counter fix), so I propose the fol