+1
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
The fix to #4561 have now been pushed and we even have a few more fixes
committed since the first try and so let's try again: I propose the following
artifacts for release as 1.1.5.
sha1:
+1
Regards,
/VJ
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.comwrote:
The fix to #4561 have now been pushed and we even have a few more fixes
committed since the first try and so let's try again: I propose the
following
artifacts for release as 1.1.5.
sha1:
+1
On Friday, September 7, 2012, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
The fix to #4561 have now been pushed and we even have a few more fixes
committed since the first try and so let's try again: I propose the
following
artifacts for release as 1.1.5.
sha1: e395307893d93a01e976656f6e0f5cee1acf3c3b
+1
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
The fix to #4561 have now been pushed and we even have a few more fixes
committed since the first try and so let's try again: I propose the following
artifacts for release as 1.1.5.
sha1:
There is a bunch of users hitting #4571 and #4561, and besides we have a fair
amount of bug fixes since 1.1.4, so I propose the following artifacts for
release as 1.1.5.
sha1: acaa52465554e82519fc312d3fcff586f55ee36e
Git:
+1
On Sep 6, 2012 3:54 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
There is a bunch of users hitting #4571 and #4561, and besides we have a
fair
amount of bug fixes since 1.1.4, so I propose the following artifacts for
release as 1.1.5.
sha1: acaa52465554e82519fc312d3fcff586f55ee36e
+1, as we're looking forward to leveled compaction fixes so we can jump
over to 1.1
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Jonathan Ellis jbel...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Sep 6, 2012 3:54 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
There is a bunch of users hitting #4571 and #4561, and besides
