Including my own, I count 3 binding +1's, 2 other +1 and no -1's. The vote
passes and I'll get the artifact published shortly.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Jason Brown jasedbr...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Carl Yeksigian c...@yeksigian.com
wrote:
+1
There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed those,
so I propose
the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc2. Hopefully the final
should come quickly after that one.
sha1: cfe51fb4f7aeddd424525b59451e71e977c7fb0a
Git:
+1
On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed those,
so I propose
the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc2. Hopefully the final
should come quickly after that one.
sha1:
+1
On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed those,
so I propose
the following artifacts for release as 1.2.0-rc2. Hopefully the final
should come quickly after that one.
sha1:
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com wrote:
There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably #5064) but we've fixed
those,
so I propose
the following artifacts for release as
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Carl Yeksigian c...@yeksigian.com wrote:
+1
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Brandon Williams dri...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1
On Dec 20, 2012 4:58 AM, Sylvain Lebresne sylv...@datastax.com
wrote:
There was a few quacks with rc1 (most notably
