Including myself, I count 3 binding +1, 6 other +1 and no -1. The vote
passes, I'll get the artifacts published.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Murali wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Jason Brown
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Vij
+1
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Jason Brown wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Vijay wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne > >wrote:
> >
> > > A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's relea
+1
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Vijay wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne >wrote:
>
> > A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a
> > new
> > beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
+1
Regards,
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a
> new
> beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
> following
> artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta2
>
> sha1: e0eacd28183b
+1
On Monday, July 22, 2013, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a
> new
> beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
> following
> artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta2
>
> sha1: e0eacd28183beb6f2b7c995b4cde4e8
+1
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a
> new
> beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
> following
> artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta2
>
> sha1: e0eacd28183beb6f2b7c99
+1
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Yes, we need to split that 1.2.7 section into "Merged from 1.2" for b1 and b2.
>
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Cobley
> wrote:
>> Just a minor point, isn't 5768 rolled into beta 2 (it's also rolled into
>> 1.2.7)
>>
>>
+1
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a new
> beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
> following
> artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta2
>
> sha1: e0eacd28183beb6f2b7c995b4
+1
On 22 Jul 2013, at 17:23, Sylvain Lebresne
wrote:
> A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a new
> beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
> following
> artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta2
>
> sha1: e0eacd28183beb6f2b7c995b4cde4e
Yes, we need to split that 1.2.7 section into "Merged from 1.2" for b1 and b2.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Andrew Cobley wrote:
> Just a minor point, isn't 5768 rolled into beta 2 (it's also rolled into
> 1.2.7)
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5768
>
> Andy
>
> On 22
Just a minor point, isn't 5768 rolled into beta 2 (it's also rolled into
1.2.7)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5768
Andy
On 22 Jul 2013, at 17:23, Sylvain Lebresne
mailto:sylv...@datastax.com>>
wrote:
A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a
A healthy amount of bugs have been found since beta1, so let's release a new
beta to shake out the remaining ones before a RC. I thus propose the
following
artifacts for release as 2.0.0-beta2
sha1: e0eacd28183beb6f2b7c995b4cde4e85b7b30e4b
Git:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.gi
12 matches
Mail list logo
