Comments inline.
On 3/1/07, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Believe it or now the structure is pretty well thought out. It may
not be obvious, but documentation should help with this.
I don't doubt it. Here's to more documentation :-) Let's see what we can do.
On Mar 1, 2007,
Believe it or now the structure is pretty well thought out. It may
not be obvious, but documentation should help with this.
On Mar 1, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I took a look at the svn folder layout.
- jpa-chapter-* and pojo are integration tests? Definitely not
obvious from
Ahmed,
We are all in agreement that Maven is lacking. What we need is
either to improve it (via patches/discussion) or provide an
alternative (ant tasks). Provide some reasonable alternatives in the
form of patches, and I'll commit them.
On 3/1/07, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Source attachment support required a m2eclipse plugin upgrade.
For some reason, my plugin upgrade checker no longer works accurately
(eclipse 3.1.2). Manually installing a newer version does, though.
On 2/28/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The one issue I see with the maven2 d
I'm sure it's a matter of
perspective.
No, it's a matter of Maven :).
So much about "maven helps a better project organization".
Looking at the many mavenized projects I see no better organization,
but a higher fragmentation (very high for some projects).
Most of the time, this fragmentation is
I think we should remove the two comments at the bottom of the page.
We've documented the use of m2eclipse at the top, and we no longer use
ant in the context of this page.
On 3/1/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I took a look at the svn folder layout.
- jpa-chapter-* and pojo a
I took a look at the svn folder layout.
- jpa-chapter-* and pojo are integration tests? Definitely not
obvious from the module names.
I also don't understand the difference between assemblies and build-tools.
I see both a modeler and a framework/cayenne-modeler directory.
I see maven-cayenne-
Thanks, Andrus. You put me on the right path. Once I installed
subclipse 1.0.5 manually, everything worked again. I've updated the
docs.
On 3/1/07, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have the plugin installed :-) Although you made me look :-)
Interestingly, Team -> Share gene
I have the plugin installed :-) Although you made me look :-)
Interestingly, Team -> Share generated an "Unsupported working copy
format".My subclipse module isn't compatible?
I'm using 0.9.106. I guess I must be too far behind the curve on
that one. I hadn't realized that 1.0 was out
Well, it's arbitrary because I had to guess what the modules were for :-)
Now that the structure is in place, could you take a couple of minutes
and correct the misconceptions (or the poor categorization) of the
modules? I think you are probably the most knowledgeable about it at
present.
On 3
On Feb 28, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I've updated the confluence page.
Hopefully others will review my guesses at the modules.
I also added my unresolved eclipse issues at the bottom of the page.
Nice start. Although the module categorization breakdown seems
arbitrary. I s
On Feb 28, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
I noticed that there's no svn attached to the eclipse projects. Did
I misconfigure it somehow?
Don't know - it is automatically picked up on my machine.
You can do this:
* check that Subclipse plugin is installed.
* right click on the
12 matches
Mail list logo
