On Mar 13, 2007, at 3/1311:11 PM , Kevin Menard wrote:
-Original Message-
From: robert zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Zeigler
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:04 PM
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: cay-763 & cay-597?
Any word/comment on cay-763 or cay-597?
I
> -Original Message-
> From: robert zeigler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Robert Zeigler
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 1:04 PM
> To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
> Subject: cay-763 & cay-597?
>
> Any word/comment on cay-763 or cay-597?
I had tried to generate a test case for the f
i want to support the cayenne project
knowledge : visual basic and dos :-)
last project : java jsr 168 portlet for file server access with single
signon (sso) using jcifs samba api and ldap (active directory) with
upload an d download servelets
i could do for the project * i don't know, may
I ran into a problem similar problem with maven the other day The
maven project released a new version (2.3) of the surefire test
plugin. This plugin changed the class loader model among other
stuff. It appears that the plugin now has a child first delegation
model on, which means, fo
On 14/03/2007, at 5:21 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
While I am on that pessimistic Maven rant ... Continuous
integration (the maven way) somehow includes the underlying build
system made of dozens of plugins constantly updated by multiple
third parties. Maybe we should revert to Ant ?
Firs
11. Hire contractors to ride the dead horse.
That one hits way too close to home at the moment ...
As for Maven ... I'm not an expert on it, but I never had trouble
building in the pre-Maven days ...
/dev/mrg
On 3/13/07, Ahmed Mohombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something changed in the Ma
Something changed in the Maven unit test class loading
Instrumentation args no longer work... Somehow I think this is related
to the new version of the surefire plugin that I noticed was loaded on
March 7 :-(
This fits to Maven like a glove:
http://www.thehumorarchives.com/joke/Beating_a_De
On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:09 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Something changed in the Maven unit test class loading
Instrumentation args no longer work... Somehow I think this is
related to the new version of the surefire plugin that I noticed
was loaded on March 7 :-(
Andrus
While I am on
I'm just curious(and IMHO most users interested CM's future too): is
there a solution for our situation or not?
If yes, how does it look like?
My recollection is that we were going to use Platonos, so I don't see a
problem.
Yet a -1 for Platonos :). Looks like an unorganized abandoned chaos
Something changed in the Maven unit test class loading
Instrumentation args no longer work... Somehow I think this is
related to the new version of the surefire plugin that I noticed was
loaded on March 7 :-(
Andrus
[INFO] Surefire report directory: /Users/andrus/work/cayenne/itests/
Any word/comment on cay-763 or cay-597?
I attached a patch to cay-763 awhile ago... has anybody had a chance
to review that?
(The patch to 763 also fixes the issue addressed in my comments to 597).
Would it be better if the patch was against the 3.0 trunk, rather
than 2.0.2?
Does the patch
On Mar 13, 2007, at 7:52 PM, Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
I'm just curious(and IMHO most users interested CM's future too):
is there a solution for our situation or not?
If yes, how does it look like?
My recollection is that we were going to use Platonos, so I don't see
a problem. It is just that
FYI:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200703.mbox/browser
Thank you for the link.
After reading those posts, I'm even more confused and starting to have
headaches :).
I'm just curious(and IMHO most users interested CM's future too): is there a solution for our
situa
On Mar 13, 2007, at 7:18 PM, Ahmed Mohombe wrote:
Just saw there's still some discussion about JPF licensing on
javalobby:
http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jspa?threadID=91097
could someone(who knows the licensing details) please answer the
"dual license question"?
Anybody?
Thanks in adva
Just saw there's still some discussion about JPF licensing on javalobby:
http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jspa?threadID=91097
could someone(who knows the licensing details) please answer the "dual
license question"?
Anybody?
Thanks in advance,
Ahmed.
Cached new entity has different primary key type to stored/loaded entity.
-
Key: CAY-768
URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-768
Project: Cayenne
Issue Typ
I see. AFAIK this is a known bug in auto-export plugin. You may
discuss such issues on [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. This is a
private list, you have to subscribe with your Apache email, so that
moderators could check that you are a committer.
Andrus
On Mar 13, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Aristedes Mani
17 matches
Mail list logo
