On Jun 12, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
SELECT t0.ARTIST_NAME AS ARTIST_NAME, t0.ARTIST_ID AS ARTIST_ID,
t0.DATE_OF_BIRTH AS DATE_OF_BIRTH
FROM ARTIST AS t0
INNER JOIN PAINTING AS t1 ON (t0.ARTIST_ID = t1.ARTIST_ID)
INNER JOIN PAINTING AS t2 ON (t1.ARTIST_ID = t2.ARTIST_ID)
WHERE t1.PAINTING_TITLE = ? AND t2.PAINTING_TITLE = ? [bind:
'P1', 'P2']
Umm... looking at the SQL, there's still a bug - the condition must
be "(t0.ARTIST_ID = t2.ARTIST_ID)" in the second join. Coincidentally
this particular query still works, but I need to fix the translator.
Still the point remains - we now have a great deal of control over
the joins.
Andrus
