OK, I just made the lifecycle changes and my application runs again.
This is a pretty good test (I do some funky stuff), at least on the
older code (I don't have any JPA/etc in it). I'm +1 for this
milestone release.
I'd like to put on my Devil's Advocate hat for a minute, though. (And
keep in
So tallying the vote we have:
Andrus Adamchik (PMC) +1
Aristedes Maniatis +1
Kevin Menard (PMC) +1
Michael Gentry (PMC) +1
I will publish the files later tonight and send an announcement.
Thanks everybody!!
Andrus
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:15 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
[VOTE: approve 3.0M1
OK, I finally was able to try to migrate my old 1.2.x project to 3.0.
After some missing jar (log4j, common collections, etc) issues and
renaming all of my packages from objectstyle to apache, I was able to
launch the application but it doesn't work. A good portion of my
application depends on
On Jul 19, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Kevin Menard wrote:
Hmm . . .
I thought we were going to continue provide fat JARs for simplicity in
deploying. Is this not the case?
Can't find the thread right away, and not sure if we had a formal
vote on this (this was definitely discussed at some point),
I've been busy trying to get some stuff done before a trip out of
town. I'll try to take a look at it today. I'm in favor of a
release, but would like to try it out just a bit first.
Thanks,
/dev/mrg
On 7/18/07, Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been quiet on the list for the
Sorry, I didn't get to it today. It'll be next week before I can
look. If you decide before then, I guess I'm a +0. I'm in favor of a
release, but just haven't tried it. :-)
Thanks!
/dev/mrg
On 7/19/07, Michael Gentry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been busy trying to get some stuff done
It's been quiet on the list for the last couple of weeks. Wonder if
all our PMC members are on vacation or soemthing?
Andrus
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:15 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
[VOTE: approve 3.0M1 release]
I posted artifacts for 3.0M1 release here:
On 17/07/2007, at 8:15 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
[VOTE: approve 3.0M1 release]
people.apache is offline again so I can't examine the particular
artifacts you produced. However, I have been doing extensive work in
using that same svn version of Cayenne for several weeks now without
any
, 2007 6:15 PM
To: dev@cayenne.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Cayenne Release 3.0M1
[VOTE: approve 3.0M1 release]
I posted artifacts for 3.0M1 release here:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M1/
There were almost no comments since I tagged M1. I've been
cleaning things up
[VOTE: approve 3.0M1 release]
I posted artifacts for 3.0M1 release here:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M1/
There were almost no comments since I tagged M1. I've been cleaning
things up, fixing various things (most notable is CAY-830 reported by
Ari), doing more
10 matches
Mail list logo
