Yeah, I wasn't inclined to include it, but thought I'd ask.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Mike Kienenberger
wrote:
> Remember that the board cares about community development far more
> than technical development.
> They'd be more interested in how the CM prototype is affecting community.
>
Remember that the board cares about community development far more
than technical development.
They'd be more interested in how the CM prototype is affecting community.
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
>
>> > The
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Andrus Adamchik
wrote:
> > The only thing that comes to my mind is *maybe* mention the CM
> prototype [1],
>
> Certainly you can mention it for our own sake. The Board does not care one
> way or the other though.
>
Yeah, it doesn't seem that worthy to me (yet).
> The only thing that comes to my mind is *maybe* mention the CM prototype [1],
Certainly you can mention it for our own sake. The Board does not care one way
or the other though.
Andrus
> On Jun 10, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
> Here is my current stab at the board report (ha
Here is my current stab at the board report (has to be sent in by
Wednesday). Any recommendations for changes? The only thing that comes to
my mind is *maybe* mention the CM prototype [1], which is still slowly
under development. I'm getting closer to having the DataDomain editor
finished. :-)
