Re: JGroups

2021-12-20 Thread Andrus Adamchik
> setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY, > multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT); > setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY, > multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_DEFAULT); > setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.JGROUPS_C

Re: JGroups

2021-12-20 Thread Michael Gentry
Well, I was pulling in cayenne-jgroups primarily to access constants, such as: setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_PROPERTY, multicastAddress, JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_ADDRESS_DEFAULT); setDomainStringProperty(JavaGroupsBridge.MCAST_PORT_PROPERTY, multicastPort, JavaGroupsBridge.M

Re: JGroups

2021-12-19 Thread Andrus Adamchik
FWIW, I was about to suggest removing "cayenne-jgroups" from Cayenne 5.0 as an old and unreliable piece of software we don't want to support :) As far as the Modeler goes it should not depend on JGroups at all. All the events in the Modeler are in-process and can be passed around within the JVM