Oipo commented on pull request #214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/214#issuecomment-623179786
Okay, testing it with clang shows that clang follows the spec more strictly.
All c11 atomic functions should only be done on _Atomic specified variables.
However, _Atomic is not availa
Oipo edited a comment on pull request #214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/214#issuecomment-623172986
So there are two ways to use atomics in C11:
1) ~~use the _Atomic specifier. No atomic functions are possible, but
assign/increment/decrement are all usable as normal and
Oipo commented on pull request #214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/214#issuecomment-623172986
So there are two ways to use atomics in C11:
1) use the _Atomic specifier. No atomic functions are possible, but
assign/increment/decrement are all usable as normal and atomic.
Alexander,
Were you able to have a look at the proposed workflow I visualized on the wiki
page [1][2]? If so, what
did you think of it and does this change your -1 to a +1 ?
If not, what else is missing before we can move this forward?
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/MwwRCQ
[2]
https
Oipo edited a comment on pull request #214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/214#issuecomment-623097384
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
Oipo commented on pull request #214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/214#issuecomment-623097384
Sounds good.
Re: ATOMIC_VAR_INIT, cppreference notes the following:
```This macro was a part of early draft design for C11 atomic types. It is
not needed in C11, and is deprec
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for the answer, great input! Answers inline.
On 2020/04/29 21:17:01, Alexander Broekhuis wrote:
> Not saying that I like all the mails to dev, but those mails do contain the
> only discussions we have nowadays (Issues at github and comments on Pull
> Requests).
> So I also
Hi Brian,
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 5:02 PM Brian Michael wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I was curious about some of the capabilities of Celix. In particular the RSA
> and PubSub implementations. Could you inform me of the following items:
> - Is Celix setup to perform PubSub between Java and C/C++? I
pnoltes commented on pull request #214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/celix/pull/214#issuecomment-623075033
If we introduce atomic, then I prefer that we use the c11 standard stuff for
that.
This means update the top level cmake lists file to use -std=c11 instead of
-std=gnu99 and
