Hi Folks,
I would like to poll everyone on a new release.
Any issues/blockers we need to address before we can generate an RC for
1.3.0?
Lewis
--
http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/
@hectorMcSpector
http://www.linkedin.com/in/lmcgibbney
Hi Folks,
I'll probably push a release candidate on Friday. There are only two issues
currently unresolved for 1.1.0, these can be found at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE-699?jql=project%20%3D%20CLIMATE%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.1%20ORDER%20BY
+1
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Chief Architect
Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
WWW: htt
Hi Folks,
Cc Brian Wilson for visibility into RCMES.
I propose to produce a release candidate for OCW 1.1.0 some time towards
the end of next week. This thread can act as a discussion point for anyone
who has issues which need to be resolved.
If I don't hear anything after around 72 hours or so the
+1 Lewis. I'm a bit swamped at the moment so I think you'll end up beating
me on that 24 hours =D It's always good to have more people rolling
releases anyway! I'll gladly give the RC a review once it's pushed up.
Thanks for getting this conversation started!
-- Jimmy
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 12:
Hi Folks,
Well I bumped all remaining issues (>100) over to 1.1 for fix version.
There have been 45 issues fixed in 0.5 --> 1.0 development drive so
congratulations folks. Quite an undertaking to those who have been
hammering away week after week on addressing important issues. Good work.
Does any
t; University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
> Reply-To: "dev@climate.apache.org"
> Date: Monday, August 31, 2015 at 10:31 PM
Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++
-Original Message-
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
Reply-To: "dev@climate.apache.org"
Date: Monday, August 31, 2015 at 10:31 PM
To: "dev@climate.apache.org"
Subject: [DISCUSS] Rel
Hi Team,
A number of issues have been addressed since 0.5 was released.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLIMATE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:roadmap-panel
In fact 45 of 146. So thats a whack.
Anyone want to make an effort as specifying a roadmap for 1.0 release? I
have
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:07 AM, wrote:
>
> I've merged pull requests for both of the above issues.
Sterling Sir
> I believe there are
> still some mcsearch license issues being worked in an issue. I think we're
> going to be good to go once we get those dealt with.
I am all over
org"
> Date: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 3:28 PM
> To: "dev@climate.apache.org"
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5
>
> >Hi Folks,
> >There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW.
> >Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application
++
-Original Message-
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney
Reply-To: "dev@climate.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 3:28 PM
To: "dev@climate.apache.org"
Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Climate 0.5
>Hi Fo
I just poked through the code. The only piece of code that is relying on
RCMET imports seems to be ocw-ui/backend/bottlemet.py. This is a really old
module that has been entirely unused in the code base for quite some time.
It's no longer compatible with the new toolkit and I don't see much value
i
Removing the old RCMET code base is top priority in my opinion Lewis. I
think the majority (or all?) of the old metrics have been ported over in
some way to the new code base so we're very close to dropping it. Once we
can safely drop that old code base then I'm in favor of pushing out a
release.
Hi Folks,
There have been a number of issue addressed recently for OCW.
Additionally, Kim's MCC Search Application is now in the codebase.
Is it possible for us to collectively define a roadmap for the 0.5 release?
Right now everything is tagged as 0.5 release. We've attacked and resolved
21 of 93
15 matches
Mail list logo
