---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11156/#review20636
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- mice xia
On May 14, 2013, 3:53 p.m.,
Folks
We are 15 days from ACS 42 feature freeze
Out of 98 proposed features /improvements, the status is
Closed: 5
Resolved: 32
In Progress: 15
Reopened: 1:
Ready to review: 2
Open: 43
For the issues that are Open I will ask to take a moment to update the jira
items assigned to you with In
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
CLOUDSTACK-2516
Create User API compability broken now
Nobody has taken this on yet.
[Animesh] I will update the JIRA ticket, looks like this was
changed by Kishan to use clear text password. I think functionality
wise
I had written the test as per the old wiki page, now will refer to the new
wiki and make the changes to the test. Thanks for the wiki example!
If there is no objection, I will do these changes post-merge.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11156/#review20637
---
Commit e26081731898e2b3de53fdfb9f58d6fdb017f09f in branch
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 11:22:13PM -0700, Prachi Damle wrote:
I had written the test as per the old wiki page, now will refer to
the new wiki and make the changes to the test. Thanks for the wiki
example!
If there is no objection, I will do these changes post-merge.
Sure - not a problem. +1
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 11:51 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Current blocker status
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
CLOUDSTACK-2516
Create User
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:51:06AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
CLOUDSTACK-2516
Create User API compability broken now
Nobody has taken this on yet.
[Animesh] I will update the JIRA ticket, looks like this was
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
As the unit of network
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11196/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
Get
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11194/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Summary (updated)
-Original Message-
From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 1:24 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ACS41] Current blocker status
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent:
Nitin,
I have unassigned this ticket as it is related to your feature Scaling up
Memory of running VMs and the fix for this bug is disabling the scaling up
functionality.
I have updated the ticket with my findings.
Can you please assign it to yourself as you have the better idea about the
Hi Kishan!
Did you verify that adding the plain text authenticator will not allow
login using the hash value itself?
from AccountManagerImpl.java;
... getUserAccount ...
...
boolean authenticated = false;
for(UserAuthenticator authenticator : _userAuthenticators) {
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11197/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
Greetings,
Would someone be kind enough to give me Jira Karma to assign myself
to issues?
username: dbrosius
Is this only for vmware ? Did you try other hypervisors since it looks
generic enough ?
On 16/05/13 5:19 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
With latest master , System VM's are failed to start with NPE. Is there
any issue with recent fixes ? ( VMWARE)
2013-05-16 17:12:20,523
Ove,
Plain text authenticator will allow logging using the hash value. Or else,
clients sending MD5 hash will fail to login. This is primarily for backward
compatibility.
To avoid logging in using has value itself, plain text authenticator can be
removed from auth adapter list, provided the
I saw the same issue with Xen.
Thanks,
Likitha
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:54 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sailaja Mada
Subject: Re: [ACS42] System VM's are failed to start with NPE with latest
master(VMWARE)
On 05/16/2013 02:16 PM, Kishan Kavala wrote:
Ove,
Plain text authenticator will allow logging using the hash value. Or else,
clients sending MD5 hash will fail to login. This is primarily for backward
compatibility.
To avoid logging in using has value itself, plain text authenticator can be
It happens only when Vm is staring for the first time irrespective of the
hypervisor. This is due to 6d57393629bb93fbf0944e462c841f245b40f919.
Below check on CapacityManagerImpl.java:684 should change from
if (vm.getLastHostId().equals(vm.getHostId())) {
to
if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11045/
---
(Updated May 16, 2013, 1:14 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prachi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11045/
---
(Updated May 16, 2013, 1:15 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Ove Ewerlid [mailto:ove.ewer...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 6:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator
On 05/16/2013 02:16 PM, Kishan Kavala wrote:
Ove,
Plain text authenticator will
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/#review20641
---
Is there a bug ID for this? And is there a branch target(s) for
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 01:42:39PM +, Wei Zhou wrote:
On May 16, 2013, 1:39 p.m., Chip Childers wrote:
Is there a bug ID for this? And is there a branch target(s) for the
patch?
Chip,
no Bug ID. The target branch are master and 4.1.
Mind putting a bug into the system for
Thanks Kishan for the quick fix provided with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2544 .
Regards,
Sailaja.M
From: Kishan Kavala
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:35 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sailaja Mada
Subject: RE: [ACS42] System
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:53:31PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote:
Our PROD is in 2.2.13, using Advaned Zone and SG enabled.
But we don't use SG features. We use vmWare.
We try to upgrade our pre-production environment to 4.1, but we
failed due to the CLOUDSTACK-2463 bug.
We have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/
---
(Updated May 16, 2013, 1:57 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
Le 16/05/2013 15:56, Chip Childers a écrit :
If we were able to upgrade you correctly to 4.1, but security groups were not
yet
functional, would that suffice?
yes.
--
Nicolas Lamirault
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 03:59:06PM +0200, nicolas.lamira...@orange.com wrote:
Le 16/05/2013 15:56, Chip Childers a écrit :
If we were able to upgrade you correctly to 4.1, but security groups were
not yet
functional, would that suffice?
yes.
Anthony,
Since VMware support for SG's in
I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth directly
against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists in ACS4.0, I
would assume not.
The API breakage reported was in createUser, where the ability to pass
in a hash has value. Think migration scenarios where only
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote:
I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth
directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists
in ACS4.0, I would assume not.
The API breakage reported was in createUser, where the ability to
On May 14, 2013, 4:22 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
LGTM. Fairly straightforward to strip the word endings. Any concerns? I'll
merge this tomorrow if none.
Unfortunately 1518e7ee was fixed without applying your patch. I'm closing this
as discarded.
- Prasanna
+1
On 5/16/13 9:20 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote:
I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth
directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists
in ACS4.0, I would assume not.
Did you specify the guest network vlan range in the create zone wizard?
The exception is complaining that there are no virtual network ids
available.
Vnet ids are populated in the op_dc_vnet_alloc table when the
updatePhysicalNetwork api is called.
On 5/16/13 8:07 AM, 錦為 rumania0...@hotmail.com
Hi Hiroaki,
Ping again.
I've got a patch(pvlan migration support for xen/kvm) based on your patch
here. I was assuming it would be soon for you to submit/merge the patch,
but it has been one month since last update. And now the lacking of your
patch blocked my fix...
Could you tell what's
Nice explanation Prasanna.
+1 to Kishan's fix.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 9:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Kishan Kavala
Subject: Re: Review Request: Added PlainTextAuthenticator
On Thu, May 16, 2013
Sheng, I'd suggest that you go ahead and merge the patch.
On 5/16/13 11:20 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
Hi Hiroaki,
Ping again.
I've got a patch(pvlan migration support for xen/kvm) based on your patch
here. I was assuming it would be soon for you to submit/merge the patch,
but it
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:55:30PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
Sheng, I'd suggest that you go ahead and merge the patch.
+1
See this discussion
http://s.apache.org/gW
On 5/16/13 12:53 AM, Kishan Kavala kishan.kav...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:39 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS41] Current
Hi Sebastien,
You and I have appointment today at 3pm.
I cannot find you on Skype. Please let me know what time you will be
calling me
my phone number is +1 267-243-3954
Adama
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.comwrote:
On May 13, 2013, at 7:45 AM, ADAMA
Hi everyone,
I'm in the process of adding a few fields to the Add Disk Offering dialog
(Min, Max, and Burst IOPS).
I was wondering which of the three English .properties files I need to add
my new text into?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 04:03:14PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote:
I vote -1 for enabling plain text authentication allowing auth
directly against hashes. I'm not clear if this functionality exists
in ACS4.0, I would assume not.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11194/#review20655
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On May 16, 2013, 10:39 a.m.,
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 12:43 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Current blocker status
The following are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11195/#review20657
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On May 16, 2013, 1:57 p.m.,
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to add a few fields to the GUI's Add Disk Offering dialog (min,
max, and burst IOPS).
Once I have these fields in place, they will of course need to pass this
information to the backend and the data will need to end up in new fields
in the DB.
I was wondering if anyone
I'm done with implementation of pvlan changes for VMWare - I've tested and
uploaded the diffs as a file on top of the current master branch to
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/
I wasn't able to update the patch on review board though - I run into the error
error: short SHA1 01a0384 is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11019/#review20664
---
Ship it!
Applied to master.
Thanks!
commit
I've successfully applied the patch anyway.
Thank you!
--Sheng
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati
vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com wrote:
I'm done with implementation of pvlan changes for VMWare - I've tested and
uploaded the diffs as a file on top of the current
On 05/16/2013 10:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
For those moving from 2.2.x, 3.0.x, 4.0 to 4.1:
1. We remove the incorrect auth mechanism and put in the right fix of
encoding at the server and not doing any UI magic.
2. We correct the API docs and other docs to indicate the user to send
in
Mike,
I am working on Disk I/O Throttling now. The source code has been verified
on 4.0.2. It need more test on master branch.
I hope to finish it before the deadline of 4.2 feature freeze (31-5-2013).
For more information:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1301
Merged this branch to master.
Thanks,
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2013 11:28 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [MERGE] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via
ServiceOffering
On Wed, May 15,
Thanks for the info, Wei.
I am in the process of writing a storage plug-in for Edison's new storage
framework. The idea is to be able to have a single SAN volume associated
with a single data disk. In our SAN, you can set Min, Max, and Burst IOPS
values on a volume-by-volume basis and I'd like to
It looks like your feature revolves around rate limiting, if I understand
correctly.
It seems like I could leverage a bit of what you're doing here, but I'd
need additional fields in the Add Disk Offering dialog (and DB) since we
support min, max, and burst values for IOPS (as opposed to just a
Mike,
The features are totally different. For the VM Disk I/O Throttling, I want
to limit the vm disk I/O in the hypervisors (support KVM only now).
However, you do it in the storage device (such as SAN).
I added two fields: bps and iops (maximum, not average/minimum/burst) in
disk_offering and
We actually have a similar question on the GUI part, we've done lots of backend
work, but the GUI part does not seem very straightforward. Would someone know
how to add options into GUI?
Also, How can I change the field type from in UI from text field to
multi-select or checkbox group? What
From my point view:
(1) UI:
ui/scripts/*.js (such as network.js, configuration.js)
ui/dictionary.jsp
client/WEB-INF/classes/resources/messages.properties
(2) Java
*Cmd.java (commands)
*VO.java (tables)
*Manager.java
*ManagerImpl.java
Wei
2013/5/17 Musayev, Ilya
Thank you Wei .
Any idea on how can I change the field type from in UI from text field to
multi-select or checkbox group? Is this CSS only change or is there more to it?
Original message
From: Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
Date:
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Musayev,
You'll find out that there are createForm object under
listView(or detailView) actions in each file, e.g., instance.js,
accounts.js. If you need a selection, you can just define a attribute for
createForm like following:
select: function(args) {
//...
}
and pass
Thanks Isaac
Regards
Ilya
Original message
From: Isaac Chiang isaacchi...@gmail.com
Date:
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org,Musayev, Ilya imusa...@webmd.net
Subject: Re: Example code for GUI
Hi Musayev,
You'll find out that there are createForm object under
Hi Wei,
Thank you for the information.
Your commit info should be quite valuable for me as a template for my own
work.
Talk to you later!
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Mike,
The features are totally different. For the VM Disk I/O Throttling, I
Perhaps someone knows why we sometimes use strings in English and other
times use keys that resolve to the selected language. Trying to learn more
about how our GUI works (example below).
Thanks!
+ ramovercommit:{**
+ label: 'RAM overcommit ratio',**
+
Hi Chiradeep,
Thanks for your suggestion.
When I configures sdn.ovs.controller to true, I do not specify the
vnet (vlan) range of guest network in the create advanced zone wizard.
And, the field vnet is null in database table physical_network.
How to specify this parameters?
Hey Ilya ,
So this is how you declare the following items -
object name :{
createForm:{
fields:{
//CheckBox Item
item object name :{
Label:'Label Name',
isBoolean:true,// This statement creates a checkbox
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:46 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Jessica Tomechak
jessica.tomec...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a Quick Install Guide published on the docs site for 4.0.x. Has
that been updated for 4.1, or is it even going to be published for
Hi Chiradeep,
Thanks for your suggestion.
When I configures sdn.ovs.controller to true, I do not specify the
vnet (vlan) range of guest network in the create advanced zone wizard.
And, the field vnet is null in database table physical_network.
How to specify this parameters?
Hi Pranav,
Thanks for posting the link to your commit, as well. :)
I'm trying to set up my fields based on the pattern we already have today
where the Admin can check a box to allow the User to specify a disk size.
In my case, I'd like the Admin to check a box if he wants the User to
Perhaps I need to place my checks in the Action area?
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi Pranav,
Thanks for posting the link to your commit, as well. :)
I'm trying to set up my fields based on the pattern we already have today
where
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/#review20678
---
Changes are looking fine.
Nithin can you also please review the
Yeah , so these dependencies/relationships would be handled when you are
passing these parameters to the API call within the actions block. Below is the
code snippet which will help you accomplish your tasks (might require little
tweaking ) but that's how the structure should look like .
You might also need to provide a logic at the API layer that It correctly
handles the case for all 3 parameters being supplied together and thrown an
exception if any one of the three parameters is missing . Moreover , you should
also implement an API level check for the minlops and maxlops to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/#review20681
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On March 15, 2013, 9:54 a.m.,
So within this block , you could use anyone of the exception handling
mechanisms as shown below -
$.ajax({
url:'API CMD',
data:data ,
success:function(args){
args.response.success();
},
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11180/
---
(Updated May 17, 2013, 5:24 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Prachi Damle
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 07:12:14PM +, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
See this discussion
http://s.apache.org/gW
Nice - thanks for digging it up from the archives. I couldn't find it
and had to write a long email explaining things :)
--
Prasanna.,
Powered by
On May 17, 2013, 5:18 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
Ship It!
Nitin can you commit the patch
- Animesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9696/#review20681
78 matches
Mail list logo
