Hi,
I am trying to re-factor com.cloud to org.apache. While doing so 2 test
cases in org.apache.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourceTest
are failing and after trying for 2 days I have no idea why.
Output of build is here http://apaste.info/8Tio
From the output its clear that both
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in
4.2?
I've been watching from the outside and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12360/#review22949
---
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11906/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 7:03 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/#review22950
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Ram Ganesh
On June 30, 2013, 6:08 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12327/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 8:14 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip
Hi all.
I was able to change vlan creation behaviour by source code modification
(plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java),
had to comment several lines of code:
private String getPif(String bridge) {
String pif =
Hi,
I was looking at the integration test within
test/integration/component/test_ldap.py and noticed that all the
hostnames are hard coded IPs.
Is it possible to bring up a standalone embedded LDAP server such as
ApacheDS during execution of integration tests?
Thanks,
Ian
How difficult would it be? If it pollutes the
test and makes it complex
I know there that there is a maven plugin that will bring up an
apacheds server based of flat ldif files:
http://ldap-maven-plugin.btmatthews.com/. Would it be possible to
trigger that to startup when cloud-client-ui
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12427/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:14 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12427/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
Sounds like a good idea if all config is in flat files. Runnable from
maven and can be linked with the checkin tests
Newbie maven question
Is it possible to do something like:
mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty-run
:cloud-plugin-user-authenticator-ldap ldap:run
On 10 July 2013 11:11,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:28:05AM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote:
Sounds like a good idea if all config is in flat files. Runnable from
maven and can be linked with the checkin tests
Newbie maven question
Is it possible to do something like:
mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty-run
On July 10, 2013, 7:28 a.m., Ram Ganesh wrote:
Ship It!
Thanks for the review.
I have to rebase with latest head and then post the patch again.
- Rajesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12358/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 10:56 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin
To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
https://tito.io/tcube/cloudstack-clients-and-wrappers
Cu there ,
-Sebastien
This looks like a serious issue. Cloudstack goes into a bad state due to this.
From the UI the host first needs to be put into maintenance and only after that
the host can be deleted. But if deleteHost API is directly invoked there is no
such restriction (there is no check to see the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11858/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 12:37 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
Adding Wido to the CC.
Wido, what do you think about adding a mirror or two from your RPM / DEB
repo server?
-chip
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 07:31:05PM -0500, Matthew E. Porter wrote:
If there is a need, we (Contegix) are happy to host one.
Cheers,
Matthew
---
Matthew E. Porter
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11670/#review22953
---
Commit 527080e8effe675e7875fff6a0a69de606e3e3eb in branch
I would not bother to look at it, if I were your, Dharmesh. Find a good
lightweigth xmlunit-like tool or another xml comaparison tool to do the
checking. parsers and dom generators can do whatever they like with
attribute order. I would say not with element order, but still trying to
make the xml
Hi all,
So we've run into a couple of features that have turned out to have
never really been production grade, perhaps due to their creation as
prototypes during the cloud.com startup period. Swift, Bare metal
provisioning and OVM are examples. Bare metal is obviously resolved
now, but Swift
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:01:35PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
I would not bother to look at it, if I were your, Dharmesh. Find a good
lightweigth xmlunit-like tool or another xml comaparison tool to do the
checking. parsers and dom generators can do whatever they like with
attribute order. I
@chip and @Daan Thanks for the reply.
I think there is some misunderstanding. The test case is not written by me.
It is failing on an already existing test case after I did refactoring,
which is why I am worried.
Thanks,
Dharmesh
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Chip Childers
Now I'm seeing this issue after pulling the latest and rebuilding.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-client-ui: Could not resolve
dependencies for project
org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-client-ui:war:4.2.0-SNAPSHOT: Could not find
artifact
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it
You can use NFS with a single server, but if you choose local storage
instead, you need to go into the global options and tell system vms to
use local storage. Parameter system.vm.use.local.storage. I'm not
sure that's the problem, but somewhere in the log it may lead you to
why there is no server
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:40 PM
To:
Could I get some comments on the following proposal?
Background:
System VMs are passed their configuration details in the 'bootArgs' field of
the StartCommand used to create and start them. For instance, with XenServer,
the vm.set_PV_args command is used.
When the SystemVM is launched, the
Seb,
Please circulate a picture of yourself in the branded clothing distributed
during the event.
;)
DL
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 10 July 2013 12:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Dublin meetup tonight
To all
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 06:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
I tweeted this from the CloudStack account. Happy to add these to our
social media for promotion ahead of time if folks send a note to
marketing@ with the full info...
Best,
jzb
--
Joe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12445/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 3:31 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien
Ignore that….I was running mvn with sudo, so of course it couldn't find the
artifact…
On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:36 AM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com
wrote:
Now I'm seeing this issue after pulling the latest and rebuilding.
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project
That seems to be the latest stable release for the KVM template (according
to the 4.1 install docs). You can also get bleeding edge templates from:
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/build-systemvm-master, say if youre
interested in ipv6 support and other features that didnt make it into
'-stable'.
On 7/10/13 8:59 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:50:13PM +, Mathias Mullins wrote:
On 7/10/13 8:59 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Chip Childers
chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:45:39AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
-Original
It's decisions like this (dropping a previously advertised supported feature
simply because it wasn't tested) are part of the reasons that have changed our
plan to use Cloudstack in our corporate environment. I'm glad to see Chip,
David, and others pushing back on the decision to just drop it
On 10 Jul 2013, at 17:08, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 06:38 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
To all dubliners out there, meetup tonight:
I tweeted this from the CloudStack account. Happy to add these to our
social media for promotion ahead of time if folks
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12445/#review22959
---
I like,
thanks for starting this discussion.
Please ignore the rest of this mail as it is not of any consequence.
As a folowup, I would like ti propose to move any peace of code to branches
if it meets the qualifications you mention; not (full) functional, not
production ready. And i would like
I understand, so either change the checker (as i sugested) or change the
expected result in the testcase.
Op 10 jul. 2013 15:37 schreef Dharmesh Kakadia dhkaka...@gmail.com het
volgende:
@chip and @Daan Thanks for the reply.
I think there is some misunderstanding. The test case is not written
(Note: Sending this to the mailing lists as blogs.apache.org is down for
the moment.)
The community is busy working on 4.2.0, and there's much to be done
before the release is ready. This week, we're taking a look at some of
the interesting discussions going on in the the community about the
No meeting today, as we had only four people show up.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
Hi,
FYI: I created a ldapplugin feature branch for Ian to commit his patches in.
Cheers,
-Sebastien
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12273/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 5:43 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Caleb Call wrote:
Although my voice doesn't mean a lot, I too would vote this as
a blocker. If it's going to be dropped, users need to be notified well
in advanced so they can be make plans moving forward instead of suddenly
being stranded on an out-dated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11649/
---
(Updated July 10, 2013, 5:50 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11910/#review22962
---
Commit f7f826d4f516144069e26b3bb112e8c22414123e in branch
1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two days, to
setup a swift environment.
2. There is no single user from the group of swift users jumping into the
thread. Do they really care about this feature?
3. If we add this feature back, will we test it for each release?
I wonder if this Swift-support question has gone out to the CloudStack
users e-mail list for opinions?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two
days, to setup a swift environment.
2. There is
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:13:07PM +, Edison Su wrote:
2. There is no single user from the group of swift users jumping into the
thread. Do they really care about this feature?
This is a developer list. Even our users don't have to be on the users
list. We have at least one known user at
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:13:07PM +, Edison Su wrote:
1. Add swift back is just one or two days work, plus maybe one or two days,
to setup a swift environment.
Great!
3. If we add this feature back, will we test it for each release? Such as
adding it into automate test? Right now, I
Hi,
I've been primarily working on the 4.2 branch as of late and was setting up
a VMware cluster for the first time in a while.
I noticed from an error message that before I can set up a cluster based on
VMware that I must add the VMware Datacenter to the Zone. I went ahead and
did this.
I then
one typically adds a cluster during zone creation or adds the cluster as a
unit (which maps to the vmware dc/cluster). I believe at the cluster
addition phase, is where you should be prompted for credentials. Give that
a try, see if you get any miles out of that.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:35
It should work for CS to do the HA (typically with the VMware
cluster *not* having HA enabled).
Nicolas, perhaps open a bug?
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Jörgen Maas jorgen.m...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be done by ESX instead of CS, to CS ESX hypervisor is
externally managed (vCenter)
Hi Ahmad,
Yeah, it seems to ask for vCenter credentials both when adding the VMware
Datacenter to the Zone and when creating a CS Cluster based on a VMware
Cluster.
Interesting
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
one typically adds a cluster during zone
Hi,
I have a question about how current storage allocators work.
Let's say I have two primary storages with the same storage tag.
If I execute compute and disk offerings that reference that storage tag
only, will one primary storage be (essentially) filled up before the other
is utilized or do
Currently for storage allocators, only random or firstfit or user-dispersing
strategies are present. This is governed by the 'vm.allocation.algorithm'
global config.
So for you case with storage tags, if you choose random, either of the pools
can get chosen. For firstfit, you will mostly see
Oh, when you say random, does that mean random among the storage pools
that have, say, the necessary storage tag or does random ignore storage
tags?
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
OK, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:40 PM,
Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
I'm all for coming up with this list but I don't see how this list can be
conclusive. The problem that Edison dealt with in swift
CS will see the new size,
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 5:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Expanding a volume on a SAN
Hey Anthony,
I assume this would be a candidate situation where
'random among the storage pools that have, say, the necessary storage tag'
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 1:44 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Storage Allocator Question
Oh, when you say
OK, thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.comwrote:
Currently for storage allocators, only random or firstfit or
user-dispersing strategies are present. This is governed by the
'vm.allocation.algorithm' global config.
So for you case with storage tags, if
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
Awesome, that's one. Any others?
I'm all for coming up with this
Very good, thanks you!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Prachi Damle prachi.da...@citrix.comwrote:
'random among the storage pools that have, say, the necessary storage tag'
Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July
OK, great - thanks!
So, it sounds like on XenServer, you have to perform some manual activity
for it to see the new size of the iSCSI target (and there is probably a
similar requirement with ESX), but CloudStack will notice the size
difference automatically (once the storage repository or
All,
For me, there are significant issues with the object_store patch. First, it
was merged to master with a unresolved -1 against it. Second, it merged a
feature depreciation without community consensus. On their own, each of these
actions violate core community values. Cumulatively, I am
John,
I'm concerned that object store implementations that's going into 4.2 will
repeat this fate if we don't add them into the automated test environment.
Perhaps, you, me, Edison, Prassana, and perhaps Thomas can work together about
how to add the current implementations into the regression
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12227/#review22981
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 4, 2013, 12:32 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11984/#review22980
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On July 2, 2013, 11:09 p.m.,
You might have to force a reconnection to the xenserver in order for CS to see
it. On every connection, CS checks these items and updates its database.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:14 PM
To:
I'm working on setting up a CS installation with a single XenServer host.
However, once I add the primary and secondary storage, the system vms fail to
start up.
For readability, I've put several logs and traces here:
http://pastebin.com/eb51JDHF --- CS Mgmt Log 1
http://pastebin.com/mbfRCei3
Hey Alex,
When you say, force a reconnection, I'm not sure to what part of the
system you're referring. Is this an action performed on the CloudStack side?
Thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
You might have to force a reconnection to the xenserver
@Abhi - Just to keep you updated code will be pushed here frequently
to show progress. I will let you know when it is in a good enough
state to be reviewed/merged.
On 10 July 2013 16:54, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
FYI: I created a ldapplugin feature branch for Ian to commit
On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
tried before ASF but no longer tested
Hi,
I was hoping to run a little VM from CloudStack on a host in an ESX cluster.
Do we have a tiny template similar to the one we use for XenServer that I
might be able to leverage?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o:
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:38 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] What other features or code is sitting around that
might be suffering from bit rot?
On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:06 PM,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11910/#review22982
---
Commit 79bec35476508b23077311888a00189573c5c9d9 in branch
Code for S3 API is lying under awsapi project. Only EC2 API under awsapi is
functionally tested.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Prachi Damle
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] What other features or code is sitting around
-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:15 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'Caleb Call'
Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
All,
For me, there are significant issues with
short answer... dont think so. having said that, I believe we used DSL
which can be downloaded from:
http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
its around 50 megs :)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I was hoping to run a little VM from CloudStack
I spent two days to install Basio, about one week to get Cloudian work, don't
know how many days I need to get swift work.
Guys, don't blame me not support this feature and that feature, please just
take a look at how many work/hours I need, to a simple thing work.
-Original Message-
ah sorry. Yes. From the CloudStack management UI, you can force cloudstack to
reconnect to the host. This forces cloudstack to flush it's connection and
restablish the connection. On restablishing the connection, there's a series
of checks and information gathered. Size of the storage pool
I agree with your points above, but think that we need to take this step by
step. Let's figure out what code isn't actually in shape, based on historical
understanding first. We then at least have a target to ask the next question:
what's covered by testing (automated or manual) for each
On Jul 8, 2013, at 11:58 PM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:
Hello,
Fresh install /setup, I am getting error:
[root@cloud ~]# /etc/init.d/cloudstack-management start
/etc/sysconfig/cloudstack-management: line 21:
/etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6.conf: No such file or
Geoff, can you answer Keerthi ?
thanks
On Jun 29, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Keerthiraja SJ sjkeer...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is there any patch file for cloudstack-4.1 to added xenserver-6.2.0 .
I knew that
If you put the primary storage in maintenance mode to evacuate the VM, when you
cancel maintenance mode for the primary storage, CS will get the new size of
the primary storage.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Cooli like that even better. :)
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Expanding a volume on a SAN
If you put the primary storage in maintenance mode to
The user, on installation of the cloudstack-management RPM, should have seen:
Unable to determine ssl settings for tomcat.conf, please run
cloudstack-setup-management manually
If there was a previous install, the existing tomcat6.conf would have
been used. Since there is none, the user needs to
Note that cloudstack RPMs don't ship with a tomcat6.conf, only:
/etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-nonssl.conf
/etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6-ssl.conf
I believe it's the cloudstack-setup-management that creates a symlink
to the correct one of the two.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Marcus
But, if the iscsi LUN is managed by solidfire's cloudstack plugin, then the
size of change need to be handled by solidfire:
1. resize the LUN on solidfire's storage though the plugin.
2. need to talk to xenserver hypervisor in your plugin, that the size of LUN is
changed. Make sure, the volume
On 7/8/13 1:40 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
So to the original question, is it your opinion that a single
management server (non-clustered) should also fence itself, or wait
for the database connection to be restored?
Yes, my opinion is that a single management server should
I'm running into the following spring exception when starting up the mgmt.
server on latest master:
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean
with name 'apiDiscoveryServiceImpl': Injection of autowired dependencies
failed; nested exception is
Hi, unless something changed (I checked 4.0/4.1 release notes and found
nothing), CloudStack uses the native vSphere HA (unlike XenServer and
KVM), so HA must be enabled in a CloudStack-managed vSphere for HA to
work. Shutting down a VM through vCenter is probably seen as a valid
shutdown (same
Is ListVmwareDcsCmd.class in one of the jars?
Kelven
On 7/10/13 5:55 PM, Vijayendra Bhamidipati
vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com wrote:
I'm running into the following spring exception when starting up the
mgmt. server on latest master:
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException:
The website comes back online now. Just in time for the newsletter this
week. XD
---
Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher
Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory
Thanks, everyone!
I was mainly curious about the traditional model (as opposed to the
SolidFire plug-in) where multiple VMs and data disks share an iSCSI LUN (a
customer asked about how LUN extension works).
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
But, if the
OK - thanks!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Ahmad Emneina aemne...@gmail.com wrote:
short answer... dont think so. having said that, I believe we used DSL
which can be downloaded from:
http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/
its around 50 megs :)
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski
You're doing great, Edison. :) Keep up all the awesome work!!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
I spent two days to install Basio, about one week to get Cloudian work,
don't know how many days I need to get swift work.
Guys, don't blame me not support
Greetings,I've been trying to get this advanced networking going on my server. However, it's just not working; I am utilizing 1 server for everything. KVM |CentOS 6.4| CS 4.1, is there a trick to this that I am JUST not getting. Along with that, it works without issues in basic mode.I just wanted
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
