Hi all,
In lastest CS 4.2 code, I create advance zone with hypervisor vmware
esxi,
create public Network with vlan id 509 specified and label vSwitch0,
when cs create systemvm(cpvm,ssvm),
a new portgroup with name cloud.public.untagged.0.1-vSwitch0 was
created, not a portgroup
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:24:18AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:02:04PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
Almost all the integration tests use the built-in CentOS template in
the deployment for their test scenarios. Sometimes this is less
desirable since the tests
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.comwrote:
A CloudMonkey script in a cron task is a possibility.
See
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/using-cloudmonkey-to-automate.htmlfor
details on writing the CloudMonkey script.
I'll try to follow up with a
Sorry, I did not have bandwidth to reply but now. Just to update people on
this; in our next steps
- Remove tools/cli from cloudstack's repo and fix README and link to the
cloudmonkey repo, inform users, devs
- Write a wiki on cloudmonkey's release process, which is around ship
fast, break things
Hi Nitin, how did it go. Share presentation, videos, blogs if any.
Cheers.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
There is an upcoming meet up on July 20th at Hyderabad, India
There will be talks on CS architecture and hacking with devcloud.
Detailed info
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12913/#review24057
---
Thanks, it was applied on the new cloudmonkey/master repo;
commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12913/#review24058
---
I've simplified the check in this way:
-missing =
Hi Rohit - Good to hear from you ?
It went well and was well received. Most of the folks were able to run dev
cloud. We have a good setup built with IIITH university and will be
holding it more often there now.
Hoping to gain more traction and interest from students as well going
forward.
Slides
I've removed the invalid tests from test_accounts when I noticed we
don't have any tests for lock/disable accounts in there. Filed a bug
for the missing tests: CLOUDSTACK-3884
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 03:19:52PM +, Sowmya Krishnan wrote:
That's the behavior right now - we don't delete the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wei Zhou.
Bugs:
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:15:12AM +, Ram Ganesh wrote:
Prasanna,
How about - automation-product and automation-script components?
Automation-product for all product bugs discovered by the automation
engine and automation-script for all automation script issues?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/#review24059
---
Review 13004 PASSED the build test
The url of build
Agreed, test issues showing up in blockers/critical is confusing.
I guess, for product issues found through automated tests, we could use Issue
type = Bug and component = Automation in addition to the actual component where
the bug is found.
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna
Thanks for sharing them with us Nitin, good to discover interests and
traction from students. Probably see you in next FOSS.in or any reachable
conference.
Cheers.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Rohit - Good to hear from you ?
It went well and
Based on our previous discussion thread[1], we've moved CloudMonkey out of
ACS's repository to its new home [2]. Now,
with 6f84e74a68d78705a06fe58f7927f42f61453a16 on master, we no longer have
cloudmonkey in tools/cli. CloudMonkey will be within CloudStack project but
now as an independent
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12999/
---
(Updated July 28, 2013, 5:38 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12654/
---
(Updated July 28, 2013, 10:08 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Wido den
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, Sateesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/#review24078
---
Review 13008 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
Hugo,
My patch was intended for the 4.2 branch and not for master (it won't apply
cleanly on master) – looks like jenkins is trying to patch this against the
master branch and I'm seeing this failure – do I need to do something here? I
can create a patch for master but I need this to go into
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13009/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3744
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12759/#review24080
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On July 25, 2013, 6:05 a.m.,
+dev (the older dev@incubator mail id showed up in the previous mail - probably
needs to be fixed in jenkins)
From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 9:11 PM
To: Jenkins Cloudstack.org; Kelven Yang;
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13009/#review24082
---
test/integration/component/test_netscaler_nw_off.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12937/#review24081
---
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/
---
(Updated July 29, 2013, 4:57 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
On July 26, 2013, 12:28 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote:
test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 370
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/diff/2/?file=328044#file328044line370
Please add network offering details also here.
#1. deploy VM using network offering
On July 29, 2013, 4:35 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
test/integration/component/test_netscaler_nw_off.py, line 613
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13009/diff/1/?file=330048#file330048line613
I think you should remove the ntwk offering altogether from cleanup.
Network
On July 29, 2013, 4:35 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
test/integration/component/test_netscaler_nw_off.py, line 613
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13009/diff/1/?file=330048#file330048line613
I think you should remove the ntwk offering altogether from cleanup.
Network
29 matches
Mail list logo
