Master build failure

Hi, I'm seeing a build failure with master - I've checked the usual gotchas, but this seems to be something else. Possibly related to the 4.2.0 to 4.3.0 update? The missing dependency is cloud-engine-compute. It's listed as a dependency in engine/service/pom.xml with no "type" specified, which AF

Re: 4.1.1 Build issue for CentOS - errors on AWSAPI depenencies

Hi, Do we have any workaround for this issue ? Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:55 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Hi all, > > Trying to build 4.1.1 into the appropriate RPMs, and I'm hitting the > following error during the process. Any clues /

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte's ElastiStor

Hi, You are definitely free to map one of your SAN volumes to many CloudStack volumes. I'm not sure how this would look code wise, but it should be doable with some changes to CloudStack. We encourage our customers to keep to smaller clusters (like four compute nodes per cluster) as a way of impr

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte's ElastiStor

Hi Mike, I have gone through the mentioned jira as well the following article in dZone. http://architects.dzone.com/articles/cloudstack-storage It describes the problem & solution pretty well. However, do we have any alternatives w.r.t one-to-one mapping between a CS Volume & a SAN Volume ? Is t

RE: please provide access to cwiki for my account

Thanks David, Am able to view the content. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2013 2:40 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: please provide access to cwiki for my account Rajesh: I noticed you weren't listed in the confluence

Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte's ElastiStor

Hi Amit, As I mentioned on a different thread, I would recommend looking at the SolidFire plug-in. Also, John Burwell and I can work with you on changes in 4.3 in the storage framework that might impact your development. The SolidFire plug-in was designed to provide Min and Max IOPS guarantees t

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 6:03 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharc

[DISCUSS] CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte's ElastiStor

I would like to implement a new storage plugin based on the recently refactored CloudStack(CS) storage code. This plugin will allow a CS Admin to interact with ElastiStor's APIs to provision and manage QoS-aware storage volumes for VMs. CloudByte's ElastiStor is a full-featured software-defined s

RE: [Doc] Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges for Review

Thanks Bharat. I have incorporated the changes. The latest guide is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-804 From: Bharat Kumar Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 11:14 AM To: Radhika Puthiyetath Cc: Kiran Koneti Subject: Re: [Doc] Non Contiguous VLAN Ranges for Review Hi Rad

[ACS42] Release Status Update: 12 days to RC

Folks We are now 12 days from ACS 4.2 code RC on 8/19. There is vibrant activity in filing and fixing issues. Incoming issue continue to be high resulting in blockers and critical in 80+. In order to clear up our backlog I request you to help out on aggressively fixing the issues. The unassi

Re: Review Board messages

and closed I saw. I created one for the markmail archive as well On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: > Created. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6647 > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > >> Please post a ticket on >> http://issues.apache.o

Re: [ACS42] Closing Resolved Defects

Looks like I'm the top abuser on that list. :) But let's use the bulk updates sparingly please. I ended up looking at ~500 updates that are just reminders and don't add much to the bug report. It also takes a toll on downloading all that email on a poor corporate connection I'm on. I read all the

Re: Review Board messages

Created. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6647 On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > Please post a ticket on > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:05:48AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > Along the same line, > > > > the mail

Re: Review Board messages

Please post a ticket on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:05:48AM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Along the same line, > > the mail being archived at markmail is still the incubator list > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I

Re: [OFFLINE] Offline from Aug 9 to 19

hide in the mountains or on sea somewhere! On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Is that allowed? > On Aug 7, 2013 8:21 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >> I'm offline from this Friday to the Monday after next (Aug 9 through >> 19). >> >> Happy summer! >>

Re: Review Board messages

Along the same line, the mail being archived at markmail is still the incubator list On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:14 AM, Dave Cahill wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that Review Board messages are still going to > cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org. > > Should we switch that to dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Re: compile error on 4.2

Thanks. compiling again for me. Tom. On Thu, 2013-08-08 at 02:53 +, Alex Huang wrote: > My bad or my eclipse bad. It was still rebuilding our project when I saved > the file so it assumed UserAccountDao was not around and pulled the import. > I didn't even know it happened. > > Sorry for

RE: compile error on 4.2

My bad or my eclipse bad. It was still rebuilding our project when I saved the file so it assumed UserAccountDao was not around and pulled the import. I didn't even know it happened. Sorry for the trouble. Fixed now. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto

Review Request 13404: Remove unused global config parameters after upgrade from 4.1 to 4.2.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13404/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharchyk, Alex Huang, Chip Childers, and

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 2:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokharc

Re: [OFFLINE] Offline from Aug 9 to 19

Is that allowed? On Aug 7, 2013 8:21 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > I'm offline from this Friday to the Monday after next (Aug 9 through > 19). > > Happy summer! >

[OFFLINE] Offline from Aug 9 to 19

I'm offline from this Friday to the Monday after next (Aug 9 through 19). Happy summer!

4.2 build broken

Latest pull of 4.2 at commit 26a5b76ee6b77909a7b8d5b00924f12e1671373d. Although not sure if that's the one that breaks it. [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Plugin - User Authenticator SHA256 Salted 4.2.0-SNAPSHOT [IN

compile error on 4.2

Looks like this line has gone missing in AuthenticatorTest.java: import com.cloud.user.dao.UserAccountDao; So 4.2 is running into a compilation error.. can someone please add it to the file?? Thanks! Cheers! Regards, Vijay

Review Board messages

Hi, I noticed that Review Board messages are still going to cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org. Should we switch that to dev@cloudstack.apache.org ? If so, who has the access to do so? Thanks, Dave.

Re: [ACS42]Attach volumes to Instance which has VM snapshots

It is currently a limitation. After VM is running in VM-snapshot mode, it is not allowed to change VM's disk membership status Kelven On 8/7/13 10:09 AM, "Sailaja Mada" wrote: >Hi, > >I have an instance which has VM snapshots. (VMWARE hypervisor) > >Now I am trying to attach DATA volume to this

Re: CONSOLE access via API

As this question has been asked a couple of times, I'll put a short wiki page for this. Please give me some time as I'm working on other tasks Kelven On 8/6/13 11:58 PM, "Antonio Petrocelli" wrote: >Hi, > >my goal is obtain an url (API generated) to open directly the Console >from my custom Clo

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2729) [Automation] Libvirt failed find primary storage and VM deployment failed

The local path of storage pool should be able to get from LibvirtStoragePoolDef. > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 4:43 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-iss...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2729) [Automation] Libvirt failed find primary storage and VM deployment failed

Here's the debugging I put in: 2013-08-07 17:39:12,286 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) attempting to lock pool 2a9c418e-dd56-3f2c-9081-032b877d5644 with file '/mnt/2a9c418e-dd56-3f2c-9081-032b877d5644/KVMFILELOCK/.lock' 2013-08-07 17:39:12,425 DEBUG [kvm.sto

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2729) [Automation] Libvirt failed find primary storage and VM deployment failed

Here's the issue... local storage isn't mounted like remote storage is. This is invalid for local storage: String lockFile = _mountPoint + File.separator + pool.getUUIDString() + File.separator + _lockfile; Need to look at storage pool type and change lockfile to path for local storage On Wed,

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2729) [Automation] Libvirt failed find primary storage and VM deployment failed

Sorry, I think the KVMFILELOCK is left over on secondary storage because it's unable to lock the primary storage, and doesn't clean up after itself. I'm not sure why it can't take the lock out on primary yet... troubleshooting that. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I just

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

> On Aug. 7, 2013, 10:58 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > Ship It! Vijay will open a separate reviewboard request for 411-412 upgrade path for master branch. The patch is going to be different given the presence of 4.2 release. - Alena

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review24841 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Alena Prokharchyk On Aug. 7, 2013, 10:44 p.m

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review24840 --- Pushed the patch to 4.1 branch with commit id ae8159b8560181f593544

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2729) [Automation] Libvirt failed find primary storage and VM deployment failed

I just tried to deploy a fresh 4.1 zone from current 4.1.2, I can't deploy initial system vms. It immediately takes out a file lock on the system vm template, and then gets stuck. if I remove the lock, restart the agent, it immediately goes back into this state: AGENT (after deleting template/tmpl

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 10:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Re: Review Request 13373: keep the existing changes in cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in to make sure we do not break the backward compatibility.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/#review24838 --- Look fine to me. Make sure when you test it, you tested both way(wi

RE: Question about creating a template

Hi Mike, The problem is with handling the command org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand, look at the log before this error and see if there is any problem with the registered agent that is suppose to handle this command. -Soheil From: Mike Tu

RE: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

Will send out a patch shortly. Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:09 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk Cc: Min Chen; Chip Childers; cloudstack; Vijayendra Bhamidipati Subject: Re: Revie

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

Let's get this applied! 4.1 branch has been broken for over a week! On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review2

[DISCUSS] Binary diff and hot patch

I was wondering if we can use binary diffs to hotpatch ACS. Currently, the way for me to identify what patch could have caused issue X, would be - try to find the suspects - it could be several. Revert 1 commit, rebuild and retry, if failed, restore previously reverted commit, revert 2nd commi

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM HA

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 1:46 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM HA > > I'm not sure we can rely on IPMI to tell us much about the host status itself. > It's easy to use it fo

RE: [DISCUSS] KVM HA

> -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 1:42 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KVM HA > > Does KVMInvestigator work on all shared primary storage, or just NFS? Right now, the agent only writes

RE: [ACS42] Closing Resolved Defects

I bulk updated the comment for these tickets asking for verifying the issues Animesh > -Original Message- > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 11:02 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS42] Closing Resolved Defects >

Re: Comment about "Data Disk Offering" when creating a VM from an ISO

I went ahead and logged a JIRA ticket for this issue. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > That sounds reasonable to me. > > Do you know if a bug exists for this or perhaps I should create one? > > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Ryan Lei wr

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

> On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:46 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! > > Sheng Yang wrote: > Please uppercase the bug id(CLOUDSTACK- rather than Cloudstack-xxx) > next time, otherwise jira won't recognize it. I also removed the unnecessary > import and blank line. Pushed to 4.2 Bharat, pleas

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

> On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:46 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! Please uppercase the bug id(CLOUDSTACK- rather than Cloudstack-xxx) next time, otherwise jira won't recognize it. I also removed the unnecessary import and blank line. - Sheng -

Re: IP Address Allocation

Yes, I think so On 8/7/13 10:59 AM, "Soheil Eizadi" wrote: >I think this is a consensus of where we are: > >We would follow the "path of NetworkElement" meaning the infrastructure >to create a service offering, the provider concept and the use of >agent/host infrastructure to support external pr

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#review24826 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:53 a.m., bhara

Re: [DISCUSS] KVM HA

I'm not sure we can rely on IPMI to tell us much about the host status itself. It's easy to use it for checking on basic poweron/poweroff, temperature, etc, but not so easy to tell if something is wrong with the OS, config, or at the software level. However, I did mention support in that thread ea

Re: [DISCUSS] KVM HA

Does KVMInvestigator work on all shared primary storage, or just NFS? I'm only familiar with the NFS KVMHA directories. >From this it seems like a clean stop of the KVM agent still shouldn't trigger any issues/HA, correct? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Edison Su wrote: > There is long time iss

Re: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

For me the most useful part is that I can take down the agent without anything freaking out. It's fairly common to upgrade the agent (or stop for a minute or two) without putting the host into maintenance and dealing with migrations. That's by far the normal case for when the agent isn't running, I

[DISCUSS] KVM HA

There is long time issue related to KVM HA, see bug: CLOUDSTACK-3535. Basically, HA won't be triggered, if KVM agent is stopped either normally nor abnormally, HA only be triggered if the network between mgt server and kvm host is disconnected and the network between KVM hosts in the same cluste

RE: 4.2 build failing with latest head

Latest build works; please ignore -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan [mailto:rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 12:45 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.2 build failing with latest head 4.2 build failing with latest head, someone please

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

No idea, it's been mostly off of my radar. I just happened to try to test a few fixes and 4.2 was having problems with local storage. At the least I'd say it's not a good idea for someone to use it (or any non-production version) right now if they're setting up cloudstack for the first time. On W

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 01:50:28PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not > sure if that is related. The master / 4.2 quality seems to be churning a ton... this isn't a good sign IMO. Did we cram in too much at the end again?

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

Local storage wasn't working at all yesterday in 4.2. Fixed last night. Not sure if that is related. On Aug 7, 2013 1:32 PM, "Sarath Chandra" wrote: > Hi All, > > Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could > not get it working. I started from scratch again to see if

4.2 build failing with latest head

4.2 build failing with latest head, someone please look this ASAP ? [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ cloud-api --- [debug] execute contextualize [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources. [INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory /ro

Re: Help needed with Cloudstack Setup

Hi All, Thanks for your inputs. I have tried with the suggested changes but could not get it working. I started from scratch again to see if it helps. But I seem to be going wrong in some place. Can some one kinldy go though the below setup and tell me if its right. I am stuck since a week trying

Re: weird test failure

ok, in the mean while please have another look at https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ please? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > I'd say the test needs to be changed to allow for a negative skew. > > On 8/7/13 2:05 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > >>I under-kinda-stand, >> >>D

Re: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

why not use systemd and launchd facilities ? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 8:28 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:53 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: shadow...@gmail.com > > S

Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/#review24818 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chiradeep Vittal On Aug. 7, 2013, 7:01 p.m.,

Re: Question about creating a template

Looks like a bug to me. On 8/6/13 11:28 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Hi, > >I have a small Linux ISO (http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/download.html) >I've >uploaded to my secondary storage NFS location. > >I can create VM instances just fine with it. > >I stopped one of my VMs that was created wit

Re: Review Request 13252: SHA256 timing attack and brute force attack fix

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13252/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 7:01 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and John Kinsel

Re: Review Request 13376: Fix QuickCloud secondary storage service ListTemplateCommand and ListVolumeCommand

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13376/#review24814 --- Ship it! In the future, please format patches so that they can be a

RE: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:53 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: shadow...@gmail.com > Subject: [KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations > > Hi, > > In our production setups we have seen some cra

Re: Values within commands.properties.in

I think 'private zones' are assigned to RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN On 8/7/13 1:29 AM, "Ryan Lei" wrote: >Curious for long. When does the rule RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN come in place >in >CloudStack? > >A CloudStack account can only be root admin, domain admin, or user. > >Does RESOURCE_DOMAIN_ADMIN refer

[ACS42] Closing Resolved Defects

Hi All, Below are total and Blocker/Critical defects in resolved state. Pl take some time to close them. Even if you get to close Cortical/Blocker that would be great. Reporter Total Blocker/Critical Abhinandan Prateek 1 1 Abhinav Roy 8 7 A

Re: weird test failure

I'd say the test needs to be changed to allow for a negative skew. On 8/7/13 2:05 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: >I under-kinda-stand, > >Does this mean I should live with the whole build failing for a while >once in a while? Meaning should I change this test and submit a patch >or is there some win

RE: IP Address Allocation

I think this is a consensus of where we are: We would follow the "path of NetworkElement" meaning the infrastructure to create a service offering, the provider concept and the use of agent/host infrastructure to support external providers. (The external NetworkGuru also uses many of the same in

[KVM] Helper for agent during HA operations

Hi, In our production setups we have seen some crashes of the KVM agent. This could happen for all kinds of reasons, but that's not what I wanted to discuss. Also see this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3954 What I've been writing for a PoC in our company is a small

Re: Review Request 13298: Put in upgrade path from 4.1.1 to 4.1.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13298/#review24813 --- Vijay, as the schema is empty, you don't have to have this file. Rem

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

Donal, The mix of vlan:// and is one of the issues i had to deal with doing this. The vlan not being handled by my first patch correctly is why this second one was made. for vlans it reverts what I did before. What is it you are seeing? And how does it relate to the BroadcastDomainType? The code

Re: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/#review24812 --- Ship it! commit 059e4b2ae0a44205a8567a79bf9a154a54a83492 Author: Ke

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

Thanks Mike. I have started looking into the storage related changes due to SolidFire storage plugin. I shall start the formal proposal process & communicate my git feature branch soon. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

> On Aug. 6, 2013, 11:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > api/src/com/cloud/network/Networks.java, line 79 > > > > > > I don't quite understand this part. Why "//" is missing in this case? > > Who would require "//" and who

[ACS42]Attach volumes to Instance which has VM snapshots

Hi, I have an instance which has VM snapshots. (VMWARE hypervisor) Now I am trying to attach DATA volume to this instance. It failed saying "Unable to attach volume, please specify a VM that does not have VM snapshots" Is there any limitation not to add additional volumes if it has VM snapshot

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

We have time based releases, so as long as your feature is code complete (not necessarily bug-free) by 9/30, it will hit 4.3. But first you have to formally propose the feature. Please see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/0h-VAQ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ni-VAQ https://cwiki.apache

Re: CloudStack Storage Plugin for CloudByte

Feel free to take a look at the SolidFire plug-in I developed for 4.2. I built it to support QoS (Min and Max IOPS guarantees), which may be of interest to you. In 4.2, it works for Disk Offerings only (hopefully Compute Offerings, as well, in 4.3). Also, since the hypervisor plug-ins needed to b

Re: Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 4:18 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev

less and less a problem :P On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Daan, thanks a million for doing this! > >> -Original Message- >> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sub

Re: Comment about "Data Disk Offering" when creating a VM from an ISO

That sounds reasonable to me. Do you know if a bug exists for this or perhaps I should create one? On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Ryan Lei wrote: > I noticed this issue long ago, and I agree with you. > > In my understanding, while the tab in the VM wizard always says "Data Disk > Offering,"

Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOU

Re: Review Request 13378: Test assumes storagetype to be local therefore test_egress_fw_rules fail.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13378/#review24804 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 7, 2013, 2:49 p.m., Girish

Review Request 13378: Test assumes storagetype to be local therefore test_egress_fw_rules fail.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13378/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Ashutosh Kelkar and Prasanna Santhanam. Reposito

Re: IP Address Allocation

On 07/08/13 1:40 AM, "Alex Huang" wrote: >I'll say it's a bad design. He he I designed it. :( We had to make >some compromises due to time constraints. > >I always intended to move the ip allocation into NetworkGurus and >actually attempted to several times but, at the end for various reas

RE: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev

Daan, thanks a million for doing this! > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev > > the three from week 30 where still open. I

Re: Ruby dev wanted

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 10:05:13PM +0800, Isaac Chiang wrote: > Hi Chip, > > I just sent the pull request for the cloudstack_ruby_client on > Github. Please have a look! > I did some restructure works, let me know if you have any concerns, thanks. > > Regards > > Isaac Looks great Isaac

Re: Review Request 13374: Automation: Affinity Groups: Removing invalid test case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13374/#review24800 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 7, 2013, 11:18 a.m., Gaurav

Re: Ruby dev wanted

Hi Chip, I just sent the pull request for the cloudstack_ruby_client on Github. Please have a look! I did some restructure works, let me know if you have any concerns, thanks. Regards Isaac On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Happy to accept pull requests for clouds

Review Request 13376: Fix QuickCloud secondary storage service ListTemplateCommand and ListVolumeCommand

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13376/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vittal and Devdeep Singh. Repository:

Re: Review Request 13373: keep the existing changes in cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in to make sure we do not break the backward compatibility.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy

Re: Review Request 13325: preserve data in iso_id column while upgrading form 3.0.7 to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/#review24799 --- Ship it! commit 95f36798559c71d1de9f34fedad597d12f09766b - Kishan

Re: Review Request 13325: preserve data in iso_id column while upgrading form 3.0.7 to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava

Re: Review Request 13325: preserve data in iso_id column while upgrading form 3.0.7 to 4.2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13325/ --- (Updated Aug. 7, 2013, 1:02 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kava

RE: Unable to create image on Cloudcentral

Thanks, but it resolved. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 3:43 PM To: dev; Prabakaran R Subject: Re: Unable to create image on Cloudcentral Prabakaran, Can you make 'I got null pointer exception' more explicit? reg

Review Request 13375: CLOUDSTACK-4144 Make specifyVlan to false for shared network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13375/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4144 R

Re: Review Request 13324: CLOUDSTACK-4104: VM Creation should fail if a zone is dedicated to a domain and user of the same domain deploys vm without using affinity group "Explicit Dedication"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13324/#review24796 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 6, 2013, 12:53 p.m., S

Re: Review Request 13370: CLOUDSTACK-4101: Update the Xenserver template/checksum in template.sql to the one verified.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13370/#review24797 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 7, 2013, 8:12 a.m., Sa

Re: Review Request 13372: CLOUDSTACK-4062: SLES 11 SP2, SLES 11 SP3, CENTOS 6.4, RHEL 6.3, RHEL 6.4 OS type missing from OS Type drop down list when registering template.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13372/#review24798 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Devdeep Singh On Aug. 7, 2013, 9:07 a.m., Sa

  1   2   >