RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

Issues with existing vhd-util covered in depth under the heading "Example of Using the Logs" at http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserver.html > -Original Message- > From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com] > Sent: 09 August 2013 0

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4082 Not sure who to assign it to ... so I chose you :) > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: 09 August 2013 05:22 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Quick Question about System VM pro

RE: [Doc] Please review: VMware volume snapshot enhancement doc

Hi Jessica, The Doc looks fine for me but the small change I would like to suggest is in the very first line you have mentioned it as "When you take a snapshot of a data volume on VMware" but this is not limited to the data volume the same technique is applied for the root volume also. Regard

Re: [Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack

If we can control fall back of IntelliCache reads and writes back to the storage then it won't hinder with host maintenance mode and Xenmotion, and I think it helps handling volatile VMs without recreating the root disks. Thanks, Harikrishna On 09-Aug-2013, at 11:39 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrot

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

I don't think you need two versions of vhd-util. If you are adding new XenServer host, just you need to copy the existing vhd-util from /usr/sbin to its correct locations and it works fine. Can you share what are the issues you are getting if you use the existing vhd-util in XenServer host. --

Re: Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/ --- (Updated Aug. 9, 2013, 6:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

[Doc] Please review: VM root disk reset on reboot doc

Hi, New doc on resetting VM on reboot is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Please provide your feedback. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=26f1eab323672d54f2a7dfa5da89c779c9d

Re: [Doc] Please review: Update base image of VMs doc

Hi Jessica, Thanks for the doc and it looks fine. Some minor changes required, The new template id in restore virtual machine API is optional parameter, if not specified vm restores to the same template. Additional thing we need to add is, we support base image update from vm created from templ

Re: [Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:34:38AM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > 2013/8/9 Chiradeep Vittal > > > I think Intellicache is different. I found a discussion here: > > http://s.apache.org/NIX > > > > > I see no different. Maybe I didn't explain obviously. Let see it: > http://speakvirtual.com/2012/02/

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

My experience was that you had to keep two versions of it on the XenServer, the original one (/usr/sbin/vhd-util) and download a new one that ends up in /opt/xensource/bin/vhd-util -Soheil From: Prasanna Santhanam [t...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, August 0

[Doc] Please review: Health checks for load balanced instances doc

Hi, New doc on health checks for NetScaler load balanced instances is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Please provide your feedback. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=8bdd69

Re: [Doc] Please review: CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc

Jessica ­ Thanks for the draft. Looks good. Some minor modifications. Correction 1 (check for "*") > Make it vmware tools instead of vmtools VM*Ware* Tools or XenServer Tools must be installed on the virtual machine. Correction 2 (check for "*") > Remove the decrease word. t is not alwa

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:25:28PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag > tells the management server not to download systemvm.iso > > Also, be careful not to overwrite the vhd-utils on a XenServer > version 6.x and beyond. The vhd-util me

[Doc] Please review: Update base image of VMs doc

Hi, New doc on updating the base image (ISO) for VMs is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Please provide your feedback. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=1786f1d701ca394ed15b

Re: [Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack

2013/8/9 Chiradeep Vittal > I think Intellicache is different. I found a discussion here: > http://s.apache.org/NIX > > I see no different. Maybe I didn't explain obviously. Let see it: http://speakvirtual.com/2012/02/06/intellicache-what-how-and-when/ http://blogs.citrix.com/2011/06/22/xendeskto

Re: Review Request 12098: Add PCI Passthrough to CloudStack on KVM Hypervisor

I've discussed this on the mailing list before. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCAJA5wJTAXH0Oi0c=fXy53MB=aqyk_octmm5cvet0d7l7b+t...@mail.gmail.com%3E The idea is that I'd like the implementation to be flexible enough to support any kind of PCI Passthrough de

Re: Master build failure

Hi, Alex - sounds good, let's raise the Gerrit topic in a new thread after 4.2. Daan - you're right that if Jenkins builds, that should prove the code compiles cleanly. Have we actually been gating commits on the catofong report though? I looked at the Jenkins build behind it [1], and it hasn't s

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

OK, so, for XenServer, systemvm.iso goes from the CS MS to the hypervisor host without secondary storage being involved? On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Yes. There is a copy on the secondary storage if you're using vmware > hypervisor but even that copy is deposited there b

Re: [Doc] Please review: CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc

+cc Nitin On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Hi, > CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc is ready for review. You can view > the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and > 4.2 branch. > > Please provide your feedback. > > Diff: > https://git

[Doc] Please review: CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc

Hi, CPU and RAM scaling for running VMs doc is ready for review. You can view the updated text at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Please provide your feedback. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=535e74d Bug: https://issues.apache.or

[Doc] Please review: VMware volume snapshot enhancement doc

Hi, Volume snapshot enhancement for VMware doc is ready for review. You can view the diff at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Please provide your feedback. Diff: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=a5ca05fdeaeb9ccc21b153698b02d33004

[DISCUSS] KVM io throttling

Hi All, For basic network, the io limit for guest network(nic 2) is 200MB/s, we set the io limit on kvm host as: >From libvirt doc(http://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html), it says above unit is >KB/s, but per my testing, it sounds like it's Kb/s. Is there anybody have the >same

Re: [Doc] CPU and RAM overcommit Doc for Review

Hi, CPU and RAM overcommit per cluster doc is ready for review. You can view the diff at the link below. This is checked in to both master and 4.2 branch. Bharat: please note, there is an unanswered question to you in the bug comments. Please reply, so I can incorporate your suggestion. Please pr

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

Yes. There is a copy on the secondary storage if you're using vmware hypervisor but even that copy is deposited there by the management server. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 3:52 PM > To: dev@c

RE: 2013-08-08 Japanese CloudStack Community Weekly Update

Hi Ilya Thanks for your comment on this. By the way, I think you had a session to introduce WebMD's cloud at meetup and other events. http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-NYC-User-Group/events/106104162/ Can you please share us it? Thanks Kimi -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

I see. Thanks for that info, Alex. So, the systemvm.iso and patches reside with the CS MS? They are not placed on secondary storage? On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > CloudStack delivers all of the patches and systemvm.iso when it first > connects to a xenserver. It then ret

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

CloudStack delivers all of the patches and systemvm.iso when it first connects to a xenserver. It then retrieves the version string and deposits that as a tag on the host. On all subsequent connects, cloudstack checks the tags and compares it with the version string. If they are different, it

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

Ah, thanks On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag tells the > management server not to download systemvm.iso > > Also, be careful not to overwrite the vhd-utils on a XenServer version 6.x > and beyond. The vhd-util

RE: Quick Question about System VM problem

There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag tells the management server not to download systemvm.iso Also, be careful not to overwrite the vhd-utils on a XenServer version 6.x and beyond. The vhd-util mentioned on the build from master page does not work with new versions o

Re: slow review board

I am unable to access review board as well... --Sheng On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > created infra ticket https://reviews.apache.org/r/13424/ > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: > > ah, > > > > it's come to a grinding proxy error > > > > On Thu,

RE: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

Daan The point is to see everything ROOT Admin and Domain Admin are entitled to see. They can see it anyway by scrolling through the projects, but its not getting us - true - *all vms* view. I don't know if only *.mine* projects would achieve the objective. Regards ilya > -Original Messag

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

Thanks, guys I ended up starting over from scratch (wiped out my CS environment, restored my XenServer hosts from snapshots, etc.) and it appears to work now. However, as a learning experience, Wei, can you tell me how systemvm.iso gets to the XenServer host normally? Is it part of what is seeded

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

systemvm.iso is missing on your xenserver host. try again after copying ./console-proxy/dist/systemvm.iso to /usr/share/xcp/packages*/iso/ on host* 2013/8/8 Mike Tutkowski > The CS MS is on Mac OS X. > > My secondary storage share is on Ubuntu 12.04. > > Thanks! > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:4

Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

maybe a column selectpr and/or a filter function; only projects matching '.*mine.*' On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > One other challenge, if you have large number of VMs, the view is going to be > very long and some point hard to read. Perhaps we can add a filter feature,

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

The CS MS is on Mac OS X. My secondary storage share is on Ubuntu 12.04. Thanks! On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > are you developing on windows, Mike? > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I must be missing something easy here. :) I'

Re: Review Request 12098: Add PCI Passthrough to CloudStack on KVM Hypervisor

As someone noted, ReviewBoard is down for now. In the meanwhile, can you create a wiki document and JIRA bug https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/0h-VAQ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/ni-VAQ https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/XUfVAQ As an end-user of the Cloud, I am not going to have a

RE: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

One other challenge, if you have large number of VMs, the view is going to be very long and some point hard to read. Perhaps we can add a filter feature, such that user can choose how many VMs per page are presented, i.e. 50, 100, 250, 500? This would apply to all UI Instance view pages. > ---

Re: [Discuss] Using XenServer 6.2's Clone-on-Boot feature on CloudStack

I think Intellicache is different. I found a discussion here: http://s.apache.org/NIX Also, this feature https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/zCPVAQ allows the same use case as the 'update to golden master' On 8/6/13 8:36 AM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote: >2013/8/6 Murali Reddy > >> So there is a '

Re: slow review board

created infra ticket https://reviews.apache.org/r/13424/ On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > ah, > > it's come to a grinding proxy error > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> H, >> >> I noticed the response times of the review board are growing. Anybody >

Re: integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in Cloudstack?

I think the price point of vShield perhaps is the sticking point? Any other alternatives to vShield? I've heard of Juniper vGW and Cisco VSG..but I guess they're all pricey. On 8/8/13 9:02 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote: >I don't believe anyone has requested this - consider filing enhancement >reques

Re: slow review board

ah, it's come to a grinding proxy error On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I noticed the response times of the review board are growing. Anybody > shares my feeling?

slow review board

H, I noticed the response times of the review board are growing. Anybody shares my feeling?

Re: Quick Question about System VM problem

are you developing on windows, Mike? On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:22 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I must be missing something easy here. :) I've set up this config many > times before and it's worked just fine (this is in 4.2): > > Two XenServer 6.1 hosts in a cluster. > Local storage is enabl

Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

+1 On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > +1 > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:54:02PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: >> > This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list. >> > >> > I'd like to propose f

Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

+1 On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:54:02PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > > This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list. > > > > I'd like to propose following enhancement and would like to get the > community feedback: > >

Quick Question about System VM problem

Hi, I must be missing something easy here. :) I've set up this config many times before and it's worked just fine (this is in 4.2): Two XenServer 6.1 hosts in a cluster. Local storage is enabled in CS. My secondary storage has the system template for XenServer. Template routing-1 shows up under t

Re: Master build failure

Dave, wouldn't jenkins do a build like that? Meanng the positive cato report is a must to allow commits On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Yup. That was the reason why it worked on my machine but doesn't work on > jenkins. It had a copy of the jar in the local maven cache so i

Re: [DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:54:02PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list. > > I'd like to propose following enhancement and would like to get the community > feedback: > > Issue: > > Root Admin cannot see all VMs under Instance tab when

[DISCUSS} Root/Domain Admin user should see ALL vms - based on their permisions

This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list. I'd like to propose following enhancement and would like to get the community feedback: Issue: Root Admin cannot see all VMs under Instance tab when "all" instances are selected. Root Admin user need to switch between differe

Re: Review Request 13134: has_units UI Field Type

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13134/#review24899 --- Ship it! This patch looks good to me. Brian, could you please merge

Re: anyone please: firewall rules application

thanks, it thought it didn;t have a plugable nic. I fixed it. I read this advice in Donals blog on logging to, very helpful. regards, On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Dan, > > There should be a warning right above that exception. What does that warning > say? It gives the

Re: Review Request 13373: keep the existing changes in cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in to make sure we do not break the backward compatibility.

> On Aug. 8, 2013, 5:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote: > > Ship It! Pushed to 4.2 and MASTER. - Sheng --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/#review24896 -

RE: [DISCUSS] CSS framework for CloudStack UI

That sounds awesome, though I'm not too much of a guru with either maven or grunt -- I would be glad to coordinate with anyone who wants to take that on. -Brian -Original Message- From: Amit Das [mailto:amit@cloudbyte.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:16 PM To: dev@cloudstack.a

Re: Review Request 13373: keep the existing changes in cloud-set-guest-sshkey.in to make sure we do not break the backward compatibility.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/#review24896 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On Aug. 7, 2013, 1:25 p.m., bhara

Re: Review Request 13323: if a failure occurs while adding VM to another network (this should be the first vm in the subnet). The ip alias created as a part of this process is not removed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#review24894 --- Committed to MASTER. - Sheng Yang On Aug. 8, 2013, 6:03 a.m., bha

RE: anyone please: firewall rules application

Dan, There should be a warning right above that exception. What does that warning say? It gives the actual state of the router that it thinks it's in. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2013 4:13 AM > To: dev

RE: 2013-08-08 Japanese CloudStack Community Weekly Update

Hi Kimihiko and Satoru, I've done a lot of work with VMware and CloudStack, I'm running a private branch of ACS with additional VMware support that is not available in current ACS 4.1, but available in my distro known as cloudsand. This distro is ran in production in at least 3 other companies

Re: 4.1.1 Build issue for CentOS - errors on AWSAPI depenencies

Great! That's what I was building the RPM's for. Glad they helped. On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:18:23PM +0530, Amit Das wrote: > We downloaded the RPMs from the mirror site & got the installation done. > > Regards, > Amit > *CloudByte Inc.* > > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013

RE: integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in Cloudstack?

I don't believe anyone has requested this - consider filing enhancement request. Regards ilya > -Original Message- > From: Jijun [mailto:jiju...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:55 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in Cl

Re: Review Request 12098: Add PCI Passthrough to CloudStack on KVM Hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 3:44 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Changes

Re: anyone please: firewall rules application

Thanks Donal, I found my ghost. Onward into the night :) On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Hi Daan, > > Here's a bit of background to logs Jayapal is referring to: > http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserver.html > > It explains why the

RE: anyone please: firewall rules application

Hi Daan, Here's a bit of background to logs Jayapal is referring to: http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserver.html It explains why there is a second set of logs on the XenServer hypervisor. DL > -Original Message- > From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mail

integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in Cloudstack?

hi, is there any plan to integrate VMware vShield as Security Group in Cloudstack? or any suggestion to develop this feature to work with Cloudstack? any suggestion will be appreciated!thanks. -- Thanks, Jijun

RE: Master build failure

Yup. That was the reason why it worked on my machine but doesn't work on jenkins. It had a copy of the jar in the local maven cache so it continued to build even though it's missing. Thanks for reverting. Will fix. I still don't understand why we have problems with Gerrit. It would have pr

Re: 4.1.1 Build issue for CentOS - errors on AWSAPI depenencies

We downloaded the RPMs from the mirror site & got the installation done. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:06:16PM +0530, Amit Das wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Do we have any workaround for this

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24882 --- Commit 630d2561d2b13882892799507613823bcc04b4ac in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24881 --- Commit ea50c6663fcff4b166fc43cb652638e3c1080c64 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13223: (CLOUDSTACK-2729) use file lock to prevent concurrent refreshPool/deleteVolume on KVM shared storage pool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24880 --- Commit b2ed632396fb57fedd7f88d36408299167f963c0 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 1:56 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle

Review Request 13431: CLOUDSTACK-3842: G11N: SC: Some regression issues occurred on build#4.2-256.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3842 Reposi

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4179) [Performance Testing] Time taken for Deploy VM async job to complete is considerably higher

Hi Koushik, I have updated the bug with my comments. We don't have to loop through resources and check them one at a time. We need to run a better query and add all the dedicated resources to the avoid set. Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Koushik Das > Sent: Thursday, Aug

Re: 4.1.1 Build issue for CentOS - errors on AWSAPI depenencies

On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:06:16PM +0530, Amit Das wrote: > Hi, > > Do we have any workaround for this issue ? > > Regards, > Amit > *CloudByte Inc.* Since I didn't have time to figure out what was going wrong, I copied the missing jars from another machine into my .m

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-4179) [Performance Testing] Time taken for Deploy VM async job to complete is considerably higher

The increase in deployVM time is due to the dedicated resources feature. I have updated the issue with my analysis. Need some inputs from the original devs. -Koushik > -Original Message- > From: Koushik Das (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:37 PM > To: c

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

> On July 31, 2013, 6:08 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote: > > test/integration/component/cpu_limits/test_cpu_limits.py, line 216 > > > > > > This test should be of assigning VM to other account and not of > > Migrating VM

Re: Review Request 13001: Automation: Adding test cases for CPU limits from Limit Resources.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 12:51 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

RE: [ACS 42] Disk Read & Write Rate (BPS/IOPS) options while creating Compute Offering

Thanks Wido. Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 4:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ACS 42] Disk Read & Write Rate (BPS/IOPS) options while creating Compute Offering On 08/08/2013 12:1

Review Request 13428: CLOUDSTACK-4187: 2.2.1 - 4.2 Upgrade: Few Guest OS Types information is inconsistent on the Upgraded Setup when compared with the fresh 4.2 Installation.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13428/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOU

Re: Comment about "Data Disk Offering" when creating a VM from an ISO

The JIRA ticket is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164 --- Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory ryan...@cht.com.tw

Re: anyone please: firewall rules application

Check the host logs (in xen /var/log/SMlog) to see which script is causing the failure. Thanks, jayapal On 08-Aug-2013, at 4:43 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I feel I am on a ghost hunt. > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daan Hoogland > wrote: >> H, >> >> I noted that in some of the 4.1

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 11:51 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vit

Re: Review Request 13375: CLOUDSTACK-4144 Make specifyVlan to false for shared network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13375/#review24876 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 7, 2013, 12:50 p.m., Girish

Re: Review Request 13375: CLOUDSTACK-4144 Make specifyVlan to false for shared network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13375/#review24875 --- Commit f1734ed71d80055fa9749ecc13a2028fd2d103c8 in branch refs/heads

Re: anyone please: firewall rules application

One extra nuances is that after going from one version to another the error message popped up while creation had actually succeeded. Deleting the rule as a next step failed. anyone been there, done that? On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > I feel I am on a ghost hunt. > > On T

Re: Review Request 13375: CLOUDSTACK-4144 Make specifyVlan to false for shared network

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13375/#review24874 --- Commit 664fbf2320b238283f872b7fd844856afc13f35e in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24873 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 7, 2013, 4:18 p.m., Saksham

Re: Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24872 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 7, 2013, 4:18 p.m., Saksham

Re: Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24871 --- Commit 8191f5c6902b3c0d677858ef851f1eade8871d8d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13377: CLOUDSTACK-4021: [Automation] TestExplicitDedication.test_01_deploy_vm_with_explicit_dedication failed to deploy VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24870 --- Commit ac6b26ff810cd2f3a9f7de0fa7bb481dd0781be3 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13426: Update Maven repo location for MidoNet dependencies

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13426/#review24869 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 8, 2013, 10:05 a.m., Dave C

Re: Review Request 12849: added backwards compatibility code to Networks enums

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/ --- (Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 11:16 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vit

anyone please: firewall rules application

I feel I am on a ghost hunt. On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > I noted that in some of the 4.1 versions I have been testing setting a > firewall rule fails. This seems to be when a router is not fully > initialized, is it? > > the stack trace seems to reflect this, bu

Re: [OFFLINE] Offline from Aug 9 to 19

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Is that allowed? I don't recall him receiving permission. We'll have to dock his pay. ;) --David

Re: [ACS 42] Disk Read & Write Rate (BPS/IOPS) options while creating Compute Offering

On 08/08/2013 12:18 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: Hi, This is the observation while creating Compute Offering with 4.2 . We have additional fields like Disk Read & Write Rate (BPS/IOPS) . I am not sure how relevant they are with Compute offering. These are observed again with Disk offering if

Re: Master build failure

Thanks Prasanna. One suggestion I have is that if anyone makes pom file changes (or any large changes at all, to be honest), that they nuke their local Maven cache (rm -rf ~/.m2/repository) and do a "clean install" before submitting a patch. This way, you don't end up thinking your work builds whe

Re: Review Request 13423: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2187: catalina log filled with ClassNotFoundException for snmp and syslog

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13423/#review24867 --- Commit 9a67a5d1ee395c90127cdf56435ebe7fd8cc43da in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13423: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2187: catalina log filled with ClassNotFoundException for snmp and syslog

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13423/#review24866 --- Commit bf5e86eb2254f84534d16194054e1b7190d8f983 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13423: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2187: catalina log filled with ClassNotFoundException for snmp and syslog

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13423/#review24864 --- Ship it! LGTM - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On Aug. 8, 2013, 9:21 a.m.,

Re: Review Request 13423: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2187: catalina log filled with ClassNotFoundException for snmp and syslog

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13423/#review24863 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On Aug. 8, 2013, 9:21 a

[ACS 42] Disk Read & Write Rate (BPS/IOPS) options while creating Compute Offering

Hi, This is the observation while creating Compute Offering with 4.2 . We have additional fields like Disk Read & Write Rate (BPS/IOPS) . I am not sure how relevant they are with Compute offering. These are observed again with Disk offering if QOS Type is selected as hypervisor . Can you

Re: Review Request 13426: Update Maven repo location for MidoNet dependencies

> On Aug. 8, 2013, 10:08 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > plugins/network-elements/midonet/pom.xml, line 33 > > > > > > same as 13425!?! As mentioned in the Description and in the Branch field, this change is for the 4.

  1   2   >