Can someone please have a look at https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/
thanks,
Daan
Without patch I am able to create review request but then I am not able
to upload patch.
Thanks,
Anshul
On Aug. 7, 2013, 10:43 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Look fine to me.
Make sure when you test it, you tested both way(with data-center or not).
Tested both the code paths ie with data-center and without datacenter.
- bharat
---
This
On Aug. 7, 2013, 10:43 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Look fine to me.
Make sure when you test it, you tested both way(with data-center or not).
bharat kumar wrote:
Tested both the code paths ie with data-center and without datacenter.
sorry with data-server and without data-server
-
H,
I noted that in some of the 4.1 versions I have been testing setting a
firewall rule fails. This seems to be when a router is not fully
initialized, is it?
the stack trace seems to reflect this, but the error message just says
Failed to create firewall rule or Failed to delete firewall rule
Send the patch over email when reviewboard is down with the subject as
formatted by git format-patch. If you know your reviewers don't
hesitate to include them in the to list.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:26:30AM +, Anshul Gangwar wrote:
Without patch I am able to create review request but
Dave's been attempting to fix this and it looks to be intertwined in a
few commits. Large swaths of code has moved around. I'll revert to
last known state from Jenkins if we can't figure out a simple fix so
Dave can proceed.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 04:11:36PM +0900, Dave Cahill wrote:
Hi,
As
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10428/#review24860
---
Commit a77f77c07505856fbaf438646d590a3f984d05c2 in branch
Hi,
Default Password Encoding Mechanism, SHA256Salt, Doc is ready for review. The
doc is attached at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1815.
Please provide your feedback.
Regards
-Radhika
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13424/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4123
Reverted the range 30c33415..f6a2c817bc. Master builds now. Others
who've checked in after these will still retain their commits but
please build before push. It's clear we are only worried about 4.2 now
but we are breaking master for those who are beginning to work ahead
for 4.3
On Thu, Aug 08,
We started to post Japanese CloudStack Community Weekly Update.
# # #
# New board member
Satoru Nakaya: VMware expert. He helps to answer question posted in
us...@cloudstack.jp. He is also publishing CloudStack and VMware corroboration
information
Takuma Nakajima: He helps
Changed the title...
-Original Message-
From: Kimihiko Kitase
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:15 PM
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: 'ad...@cloudstack.jp'
Subject: RE: 2013-08-01 Japanese CloudStack Community Weekly Update
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13423/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Sateesh Chodapuneedi.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13425/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13426/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
I feel I am on a ghost hunt.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
I noted that in some of the 4.1 versions I have been testing setting a
firewall rule fails. This seems to be when a router is not fully
initialized, is it?
the stack trace seems to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 11:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13426/#review24869
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 8, 2013, 10:05 a.m., Dave
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24870
---
Commit ac6b26ff810cd2f3a9f7de0fa7bb481dd0781be3 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24871
---
Commit 8191f5c6902b3c0d677858ef851f1eade8871d8d in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24872
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 7, 2013, 4:18 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13377/#review24873
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 7, 2013, 4:18 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13375/#review24875
---
Commit f1734ed71d80055fa9749ecc13a2028fd2d103c8 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 11:51 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
Check the host logs (in xen /var/log/SMlog) to see which script is causing the
failure.
Thanks,
jayapal
On 08-Aug-2013, at 4:43 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I feel I am on a ghost hunt.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
The JIRA ticket is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4164
---
Yu-Heng (Ryan) Lei, Associate Reasearcher
Chunghwa Telecom Laboratories / Cloud Computing Laboratory
Thanks Wido.
Regards,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 4:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ACS 42] Disk Read Write Rate (BPS/IOPS) options while creating
Compute Offering
On 08/08/2013
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 12:51 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
On July 31, 2013, 6:08 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
test/integration/component/cpu_limits/test_cpu_limits.py, line 216
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13001/diff/2/?file=330095#file330095line216
This test should be of assigning VM to other account and not of
Migrating VM, because
The increase in deployVM time is due to the dedicated resources feature. I have
updated the issue with my analysis. Need some inputs from the original devs.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 6:37 PM
To:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:06:16PM +0530, Amit Das wrote:
Hi,
Do we have any workaround for this issue ?
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
Since I didn't have time to figure out what was going wrong, I copied
the missing jars from another machine into my
Hi Koushik,
I have updated the bug with my comments. We don't have to loop through
resources and check them one at a time. We need to run a better query and add
all the dedicated resources to the avoid set.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das
Sent: Thursday,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Devdeep Singh.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3842
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13431/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 1:56 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24880
---
Commit b2ed632396fb57fedd7f88d36408299167f963c0 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24881
---
Commit ea50c6663fcff4b166fc43cb652638e3c1080c64 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review24882
---
Commit 630d2561d2b13882892799507613823bcc04b4ac in branch
We downloaded the RPMs from the mirror site got the installation done.
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.comwrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 12:06:16PM +0530, Amit Das wrote:
Hi,
Do we have any
Yup. That was the reason why it worked on my machine but doesn't work on
jenkins. It had a copy of the jar in the local maven cache so it continued to
build even though it's missing. Thanks for reverting. Will fix.
I still don't understand why we have problems with Gerrit. It would have
hi,
is there any plan to integrate VMware vShield as Security Group in
Cloudstack?
or any suggestion to develop this feature to work with Cloudstack?
any suggestion will be appreciated!thanks.
--
Thanks,
Jijun
Hi Daan,
Here's a bit of background to logs Jayapal is referring to:
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserver.html
It explains why there is a second set of logs on the XenServer hypervisor.
DL
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Thanks Donal,
I found my ghost. Onward into the night :)
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Donal Lafferty
donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
Here's a bit of background to logs Jayapal is referring to:
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserver.html
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12098/
---
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 3:44 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
I don't believe anyone has requested this - consider filing enhancement request.
Regards
ilya
-Original Message-
From: Jijun [mailto:jiju...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 10:55 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: integrate VMware vShield as SecurityGroup in
Great! That's what I was building the RPM's for. Glad they helped.
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:18:23PM +0530, Amit Das wrote:
We downloaded the RPMs from the mirror site got the installation done.
Regards,
Amit
*CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:42
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13323/#review24894
---
Committed to MASTER.
- Sheng Yang
On Aug. 8, 2013, 6:03 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/#review24896
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Sheng Yang
On Aug. 7, 2013, 1:25 p.m.,
That sounds awesome, though I'm not too much of a guru with either maven or
grunt -- I would be glad to coordinate with anyone who wants to take that on.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Amit Das [mailto:amit@cloudbyte.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 10:16 PM
To:
On Aug. 8, 2013, 5:40 p.m., Sheng Yang wrote:
Ship It!
Pushed to 4.2 and MASTER.
- Sheng
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13373/#review24896
thanks, it thought it didn;t have a plugable nic. I fixed it.
I read this advice in Donals blog on logging to, very helpful.
regards,
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Dan,
There should be a warning right above that exception. What does that warning
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13134/#review24899
---
Ship it!
This patch looks good to me. Brian, could you please
This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list.
I'd like to propose following enhancement and would like to get the community
feedback:
Issue:
Root Admin cannot see all VMs under Instance tab when all instances are
selected. Root Admin user need to switch between
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 06:54:02PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
This question was asked several times on dev and user mailing list.
I'd like to propose following enhancement and would like to get the community
feedback:
Issue:
Root Admin cannot see all VMs under Instance tab when all
Dave, wouldn't jenkins do a build like that? Meanng the positive cato
report is a must to allow commits
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Yup. That was the reason why it worked on my machine but doesn't work on
jenkins. It had a copy of the jar in the
ah,
it's come to a grinding proxy error
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
I noticed the response times of the review board are growing. Anybody
shares my feeling?
I've discussed this on the mailing list before.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCAJA5wJTAXH0Oi0c=fXy53MB=aqyk_octmm5cvet0d7l7b+t...@mail.gmail.com%3E
The idea is that I'd like the implementation to be flexible enough to
support any kind of PCI Passthrough
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 10:25:28PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote:
There's a tag that is applied to you XenServer. AFAIK, the tag
tells the management server not to download systemvm.iso
Also, be careful not to overwrite the vhd-utils on a XenServer
version 6.x and beyond. The vhd-util
Jessica Thanks for the draft. Looks good. Some minor modifications.
Correction 1 (check for *) Make it vmware tools instead of vmtools
listitemparaVM*Ware* Tools or XenServer Tools must be installed on the
virtual machine./para/listitem
Correction 2 (check for *) Remove the
59 matches
Mail list logo
