---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13552/#review25123
---
Review 13552 failed the build test : UNSTABLE
The url of build
Hi,
I am trying to scale up my VM memory from 512 MB to 1024 MB.
It does not allow me to update service offering saying Only scaling up the vm
is supported, new service offering should have both cpu and memory greater than
the old values
I wanted to increase only Memory and not CPU. Why are
Hi,
Verified the scenario again. We do support . I got misguided with the error
message new service offering should have both cpu and memory greater than the
old values
I had an offering to scale up memory and lesser value for CPU.
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From:
Yes. we need to the improve the error message. Previously it was put to say any
resource value should not less than the old value.
On 14-Aug-2013, at 12:13 PM, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to scale up my VM memory from 512 MB to 1024 MB.
It does not allow
Created a ticket for tracking
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4313
On 14-Aug-2013, at 12:37 PM, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com
wrote:
Yes. we need to the improve the error message. Previously it was put to say
any resource value should not less than the
Heya,
I'm working on that already. Hopefully I get it fixed today.
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: maandag 12 augustus 2013 16:55
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Master build failure
Apart from false failures
I also found one reason for the random failures.
Jenkins does a reset of the git tree for each new build, but doesn't clean the
workspace. So if a patch actually adds a file, that file will remain in the
working directory. If that file contains a compilation error or is a testcase,
it will
Hey Frank,
Those packages have no dependencies on cloudstack-management, so that should be
alright.
Is the cloud-daemonize only installed with the agent? I seem to remember that
it was also required to install it with the management server? If that is the
case we should move the obsolete to
Heya,
Right now I'm focusing on getting the new website for the November conference
online. Once that is done I'll try to add the old website or at least videos
from past events.
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: ryanlei750...@gmail.com [mailto:ryanlei750...@gmail.com] On
Heya Prasanna,
I saw your feature. Nice. It works on the mac but you knew that. I'd
better bring my mac to work today:|
Daan
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 02:46:02PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:17
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11942/#review25127
---
An issue related to this patch:
Thanks for the info, Mike and Alex - will investigate further.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I see my e-mail Subject already says that, though. :)
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Thanks wido for the quick response and for the appreciation. It will be good if
you address all these issue within this week(coming 1 or 2 days) so that we
will have time do regression(not sure ether it might impact other nfs
partitions if we enabled ceph on cluster --it looks like you are
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13556/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Reddy.
Bugs: Cloudstack-4317
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13556/#review25128
---
Review 13556 PASSED the build test
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13557/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek.
Bugs: Cloudstack-4132
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13557/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 10:13 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13556/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 10:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13557/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 10:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13557/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 10:29 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13557/#review25129
---
Review 13557 PASSED the build test
The url of build
Functionality wise there is no issue(host is getting link local IP) but first
time its getting the exception when we add the host.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1236
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: 14 August 2013
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13558/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3688
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13559/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13559/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 11:35 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Murali
Hi,
This regarding snapshot process in KVM. Does libvirt allow creating snapshots
on two disks of a vm at the same time?
I have deployed a vm with root and data disk. Configured recurring snapshot
policies on both root disk and data disk and snapshot process triggered on both
the disks with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13556/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 11:42 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal
Hi Sanjeev,
As I understand it from a cloudstack prospective it will work per disk.
This error is returned because the KVM snapshot command (of which i can't
remember the name of at this time), takes control of the VM state
because the VM is paused while part of the copy is taking place.
It may
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13556/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 11:50 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Prachi Damle.
Bugs:
Hi guys,
I was planning on making some documentation which explains how to prepare a
Linux VM for template creation (there is a good doc about Windows), what do
you think? My only current issue is how to pick up a hostname from DHCP,
while I have worked out how to do it, I would be intrested to
Absolutely. Thanks for the effort, Marty.
-Original Message-
From: Marty Sweet [mailto:msweet@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:33 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Linux Template Documentation
Hi guys,
I was planning on making some documentation which explains
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13558/#review25130
---
Review 13558 PASSED the build test
The url of build
On 08/14/2013 02:02 PM, Marty Sweet wrote:
Hi guys,
I was planning on making some documentation which explains how to prepare a
Linux VM for template creation (there is a good doc about Windows), what do
you think? My only current issue is how to pick up a hostname from DHCP,
while I have
it was the bridge module who still loaded at boot
Le 09/08/2013 23:07, Chiradeep Vittal a écrit :
I haven't tried it, but have you looked at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/15XlAQ
On 8/9/13 10:23 AM, Thomas Schneider thomas.schnei...@euskill.com
wrote:
this is 4.1
Le 09/08/2013
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/#review25133
---
Review 13560 PASSED the build test
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/
---
(Updated Aug. 14, 2013, 12:56 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
With the current implementation of snapshots for kvm I think its a bug. It
should be creating snapshot of only 1 volume belonging to a vm at a time
On 14/08/13 5:10 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
This regarding snapshot process in KVM. Does libvirt allow creating
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13223/#review25134
---
Commit ba90fa91d3da56d4b63a0850d58add34cc5a7a2c in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/#review25135
---
Vijayendra changed some codes on 4.2 branch in commit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13559/#review25136
---
Review 13559 PASSED the build test
The url of build
It does currently enforce 1 volume at a time, although I have noticed some
buggy behaviour with the feature, for example queuing the next volume but
never doing it, I haven't debugged these issues though.
Marty
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013, Nitin Mehta wrote:
With the current implementation
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13317/#review25138
---
Review 13317 PASSED the build test
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13550/#review25137
---
test/integration/component/test_accounts.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13549/#review25139
---
The patch in this review is contained in the patch for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13552/#review25140
---
test/integration/component/test_network_offering.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13546/#review25141
---
RvR seems to be very fragile. I'm going to disable the entire
Please note that you have to remove the udev rule for networking, otherwise MAC
address will be hardcoded and VM on power on will have an old MAC address for
the network card that no longer exists. End result will be no network
connectivity.
As for DHCP hostname, it usually picks up the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13558/#review25143
---
Commit 151fc3e8375ad5fea2f2e5d07445b5c40f02b59f in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13558/#review25142
---
Commit c5f1aea39d6d0e7fbb1966d221627f7236bd6eb9 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13558/#review25144
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 14, 2013, 11:18 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13523/#review25145
---
test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Hugo Trippaers
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Hey Frank,
Those packages have no dependencies on cloudstack-management, so that should
be alright.
Is the cloud-daemonize only installed with the agent? I seem to remember that
it was also required to
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 08/14/2013 02:02 PM, Marty Sweet wrote:
Hi guys,
I was planning on making some documentation which explains how to prepare
a
Linux VM for template creation (there is a good doc about Windows), what
do
you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13523/#review25146
---
test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py
That's what I've noticed, as well: The issue is when the host is added, but
the problem resolves itself shortly after.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 5:15 AM, Suresh Sadhu suresh.sa...@citrix.comwrote:
Functionality wise there is no issue(host is getting link local IP) but
first time its getting the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 02:30:10PM +0200, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
By the way on the subject on gerrit, we had this discussion before.
If anyone wants to refresh the arguments from last time:
http://markmail.org/message/inerurmjtc6v57ba
Another annoyance I have with RB is that when I review a
Can anybody provide any insight as to when 4.3 is going to be added to the
compatibility matrix?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Compatiblity+Mat
rix
Thanks.
--
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
david.lamo...@netapp.com
Not sure if anybody has seen this, but I just noticed today after my
nonoss build ;-) Could've been there before, though.
GET
http://nimbus:8080/client/api?command=listCapabilitiesresponse=jsonsessio
nkey=DGLyurBUgoy5E6VuOTdDdxIIV5o%3D_=1376494740700 401 (Unauthorized)
jquery.js:7829
Very interested in seeing this doc, there is no clear documentation on
this process.
-jason
On 8/14/2013 5:02 AM, Marty Sweet wrote:
Hi guys,
I was planning on making some documentation which explains how to prepare a
Linux VM for template creation (there is a good doc about Windows), what do
Checkout Donal's howto on XS debugging
http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/using-cloudstacks-log-files-xenserv
er.html
On 8/13/13 2:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I get the following exception when trying to add a 6.1 XenServer host into
a cluster in 4.2.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13132/#review25152
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Federle
On Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13072/#review25153
---
Any comments?
- Marcus Sorensen
On Aug. 6, 2013, 10:32 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13132/#review25154
---
Review 13132 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13131/#review25155
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Federle
On Aug. 2, 2013, 1:38 p.m.,
Is this something I've broken?
On Aug 14, 2013, at 1:36 PM, Jenkins Cloudstack.orghttp://Cloudstack.org
h...@apache.orgmailto:h...@apache.org
wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13132/
Review 13132 failed the build test : FAILURE
-Original Message-
From: Marty Sweet [mailto:msweet@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 4:47 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: snapshots in kvm
Hi Sanjeev,
As I understand it from a cloudstack prospective it will work per disk.
This error is returned
Hi,
I am trying to build the documentation from the latest git pull. After
running the following, lots of processing file entries appear, then the
following errors:
marty@devbox:~/workspace/cloudstack/docs$ publican build --formats html
--langs en-US
Yes missing . :)
The Blog post you wrote was a good. We need something like that and the Citrix
post in the Wiki and may be for each vendor plugin we can update their special
logging requirements. Right now the focus in on the Hypervisors but as we get
more Storage and Networking solutions
Marty,
These errors are caused by files being included in the docs twice as well as
links pointing to destinations that aren't included in the same book. I have a
page on this in the project wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Publican+Troubleshooting+Guide
In the end,
Hi All,
Following QA Tasks are not closed and require your attention. Can you review
the list and see if these can be resolved/closed.
- For some of these parent story might have been pushed to next
release, in such case set fixed version as Future
Thanks
/Sudha
CLOUDSTACK-903
Feature owners / Community members - can you review the following QA subtasks
and see if you can provide some validation report so these can be closed.
Even if you are not developer of the features, you may have used it so pl
provide such type of validation report as well if you happen to have
On Aug. 14, 2013, 7:48 a.m., Wei Zhou wrote:
An issue related to this patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4314
and patch:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=eb59c3c
Testing ok on devcloud.
indeed I did not test with the
I wonder if Donal can answer this question?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
In looking at my Xen boxes, disksizeused appears to equate to used space.
disksizeallocated, I presume, should equate to what Xen calls allocated
space, but it
Hi Guys,
Just asking this off the top of my head with no research done at all.
Its a pure Just out of interest query.
Would it be a difficult task to add an interface to Cloudstack in
order to enable it to communicate with some REST based API that goes
back to some hypervisor?
Can anybody point
Community members,
Pl review fixes done for the issues that you have reported. RC drop date is
getting close and feature developer may not get a chance to fix it if these are
not fixed as per your requirements.
Pl take some time, validate and close
Thanks
/Sudha
project = CLOUDSTACK AND
Tom, I checked in a fix for this, can you please retry with latest 4.2.
Thanks
-min
On 8/2/13 2:28 AM, Thomas O'Dowd tpod...@cloudian.com wrote:
Sanjeev,
Any further ideas on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3229
John worked and I worked on it quite a lot yesterday (he had a
Yes, it is a hypervisor plugin. While the extension method may be simple,
the impedance mismatch between the CloudStack virtual model and the
hypervisor API is what causes the most pain.
E.g., CloudStack will hand a VirtualMachineTO object (consisting of
cpu/mem/nic) and then you have to use the
Sudha:
CLOUDSTACK-903CLOUDSTACK-40 QA - New Image based provisioning
method for Baremetal
IS this new baremetal feature or referring to existing baremetal project?
How to update these 2 bugs ?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Sudha Ponnaganti
I see that parent task is marked as won't fix so resolved QA task also as such.
No need to take any action on this
-Original Message-
From: Angeline Shen [mailto:angeline.s...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 7:14 PM
To: 'dev@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [ACS42] QA
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13549/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2013, 2:50 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13550/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2013, 3 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13549/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2013, 3:04 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Thanks, Hari. I have added your comments to the doc bug for now and will
update the doc asap.
Jessica T.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Harikrishna Patnala
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Jessica,
Thanks for the doc and it looks fine. Some minor changes required,
The new
Since no comments have been made against this doc, I am resolving the bug.
Jessica T.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Jessica Tomechak
jessica.tomec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
New doc on resetting VM on reboot is ready for review. You can view the
updated text at the link below. This is
We didn't get enough response from people with Cool Clouds to show off in
this video, so we have shelved it for now, at least for myself and Gregg's
part. If some other person would like to step forward and take up the idea,
of course, that would be great! Thanks to everyone who did respond to our
I am planning to modify some of the Netscaler tests (test_netscaler_lb_algo,
test_netscaler_lb_sticky, test_netscaler_lb) in our integration suite to
include adding of NS device in the setUpClass(). And remove the device in
tearDownClass(). Currently this is not consistently done across all
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13523/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2013, 4:41 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
On Aug. 14, 2013, 2:38 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py, line 1665
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13523/diff/1/?file=340307#file340307line1665
The multihost tag is only when the test requires the presence of
multiple hosts in it.
On Aug. 14, 2013, 2:46 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
test/integration/component/test_affinity_groups.py, line 507
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13523/diff/1/?file=340307#file340307line507
I didn't quite understand this assert. What hostid are we talking about?
The host id is from
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12962/#review25208
---
Commit 0d0409bddbcd9d8543d8dcf8d4648b9fcf6f5b2c in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12962/#review25209
---
Commit 682e995a4a21e2d74b79bc26513055b913f3545d in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13523/#review25210
---
Ship it!
Applied with changes to git summary. Please take care to
On Aug. 15, 2013, 5:10 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
Applied with changes to git summary. Please take care to write a meaningful
summary in the next patch.
Wilco. Thanks Prasanna!
- Ashutosh
---
This is an automatically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13550/#review25212
---
Ship it!
applied with changes to git summary. please use a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13549/#review25213
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Aug. 15, 2013, 3:04 a.m.,
96 matches
Mail list logo
