Folks
We are getting closer to our announced RC date of 8/19 and what a great effort
in just last 2 weeks 260 issues were created and 340 were resolved and over 400
resolved issues were verified . The open blocker and critical count has come
down significantly and we have 2 blocker and 15
Hi Jessica,
Should I try to fix these errors? I can't see any build tests on Jenkins
which are failing but that does seem to be looking at another source, where
is this picked up from?
Thanks,
Marty
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
Marty,
These errors are caused by
On jenkins this is what is used:
cp -R /usr/share/publican/Common_Content Common_Content
cp -R docs/publican-cloudstack Common_Content/cloudstack
(cd docs publican build --config=publican-adminguide.cfg --formats html,pdf
--langs en-US --common_content=./Common_Content)
for format in html ; do
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 04:27:19AM +, Sowmya Krishnan wrote:
I am planning to modify some of the Netscaler tests (test_netscaler_lb_algo,
test_netscaler_lb_sticky, test_netscaler_lb) in our integration suite to
include adding of NS device in the setUpClass(). And remove the device in
-Original Message-
From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:42 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Minor changes to Marvin tests for Netscaler
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 04:27:19AM +, Sowmya Krishnan wrote:
I am planning to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/
---
(Updated Aug. 15, 2013, 7:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
Thank you Jessica, doc looks good for me.
-Harikrishna
On 15-Aug-2013, at 8:54 AM, Jessica Tomechak
jessica.tomec...@gmail.commailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com wrote:
Since no comments have been made against this doc, I am resolving the bug.
Jessica T.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:16 PM,
Definitely possible to add new Hypervisor types, if that's what you're asking.
How easy it is depends on how much existing CloudStack infrastructure you can
exploit. Let me out line the task with the help of some planning questions:
1. What will be your agent model? Will you talk directly
For those interested in the subject,
please have a look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/RY7lAQ
I have implemented this on 4.1.1 and want to port it to master in four
phases. the phases i have defined as subtasks of jira ticket
CLOUDSTACK-1532.
the first phase is out as a review request
Hi Mike,
I've had problems with GUI stats as well. I tried to solve the issue by
focusing on the kernel commands that are used to populate database entries the
GUI relies on.
There seem to be three important commands: GetStorageStatsCommand,
StartupStorageCommand and
H,
Is there a (wiki-)page on cloudstack ui development? I am looking at
some ui enhancements.
(for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4328 and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1532)
thanks,
Daan
found it
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+API+Development
thanks
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
Is there a (wiki-)page on cloudstack ui development? I am looking at
some ui enhancements.
(for
sorry, no
I was to quick to be enthousiastic. I mean UI dev:(
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+UI+Development
but I did find it :)
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
found it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12849/#review25215
---
Ship it!
With no open issues and all review items processed i'm
Heya all,
Together with Daan we made some changes to the reviewboard buildtool. The
following changes are now implemented:
* Re-build if a new diff is submitted after the original build
* Don't try to build a review that already has a ship-it review
On the todo list it:
* honour the branch
I'm new to Publican, as well.
When I run the following:
c:\docs\en-USpublican build --formats=test --langs=en-US
I get the following error message:
Config file not found: publican.cfg. at script/publican line 689
Unfortunately I don't know much about Publican. I'm just trying to document
the
To save me a bit of time, could someone explain the use case for
LocalNfsSecondaryStorage?
Seems to be used in
engine/storage/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/LocalHostEndpoint.java, but
I've no idea why.
Any comments most welcome,
DL
Hi Mike,
Try the --config=publican-all.cfg option. Please let me know if you can get
it to build successfully?
Thanks,
Marty
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I'm new to Publican, as well.
When I run the following:
c:\docs\en-USpublican
Used in S3/Swift as secondary storage, when we add S3 image store, we need
to automatically download system vm template to these image stores, which
are done at MS host since ssvm is not up yet at that point.
Thanks
-min
On 8/15/13 10:41 AM, Donal Lafferty donal.laffe...@citrix.com wrote:
To
You can follow what Prasanna do in jenkins.
Have a look at http://linux.die.net/man/1/publican
2013/8/15 Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
I'm new to Publican, as well.
When I run the following:
c:\docs\en-USpublican build --formats=test --langs=en-US
I get the following error
You know, as I re-read the instructions, I just found that I had missed a
step.
Everything seems to be building at the moment.
The one problem I did have was installing the cloudstack brand. I had to
comment the brand line out of my publican.cfg file. Any thoughts on this?
Thanks!
On Thu, Aug
It runs in the context (same java vm) as the MS.
On 8/15/13 10:45 AM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Used in S3/Swift as secondary storage, when we add S3 image store, we need
to automatically download system vm template to these image stores, which
are done at MS host since ssvm is not up
It looks like my build did eventually fail:
Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/writing-new-documentation.xml -
tmp/en-US/xml/writing-new-documentation.xml
Processing file tmp/en-US/xml_tmp/xenserver-maintenance-mode.xml -
tmp/en-US/xml/xenserver-maintenance-mode.xml
Processing file
Some of you may remember a previous thread where I talked a bit about this, so
bear with me:
We are working on an API plugin that we would like to be hot deployable (not
committed to source and can be deployed at any time). In a previous discussion,
I was told that this had not been tested
LGTM
On 8/14/13 9:27 PM, Sowmya Krishnan sowmya.krish...@citrix.com wrote:
I am planning to modify some of the Netscaler tests
(test_netscaler_lb_algo, test_netscaler_lb_sticky, test_netscaler_lb) in
our integration suite to include adding of NS device in the setUpClass().
And remove the device
Looks like the file reference is wrong (two .xml parts):
removed-api-4.2.xml.xml
I changed it and plan to rebuild. I did find removed-api-4.2.xml (one .xml)
in the proper folder.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
It looks like my build did
Yes
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mike,
Are you building from the 4.2 branch?
Marty
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Looks like the file reference is wrong (two .xml parts):
Doh! The message I'm looking for is part of this e-mail chain! :)
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Now I get the following.
I think there was an e-mail about this maybe yesterday. I'm going to check
to see if I still have it.
DTD
Now I get the following.
I think there was an e-mail about this maybe yesterday. I'm going to check
to see if I still have it.
DTD Validation failed:
cloudstack.xml:26: validity error : ID
hypervisor-support-for-primarystorage already defined
cloudstack.xml:51: validity error : ID prereq-addnic
Seems related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3650
Not sure about why the mvn repo is used. Have you tried clean install?
On 8/15/13 11:05 AM, SuichII, Christopher chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Some of you may remember a previous thread where I talked a bit about
this, so
Probably closer to feature freeze (9/30)
On 8/14/13 8:02 AM, La Motta, David david.lamo...@netapp.com wrote:
Can anybody provide any insight as to when 4.3 is going to be added to the
compatibility matrix?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Compatiblity+Ma
t
rix
I was just curious about something with regards to our release schedule.
Is it going to be the norm that one release will overlap another by a month
or so?
For example, we're still working on 4.2 until 8/19, but this month and next
are when features are supposed to be worked on for 4.3.
Thanks!
Not good. Especially since it is documented
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/4wnVAQ
On 8/13/13 1:41 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
LS,
I see a lot of commits with only ticket numbers as commit messages.
This is not very descriptive and makes me suspicious of what I am
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/6x-VAQ
On 8/15/13 11:34 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I was just curious about something with regards to our release schedule.
Is it going to be the norm that one release will overlap another by a
month
or so?
For example, we're
Yes the commit message should have a brief summary of the change
-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:36 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] git commit messages
Not good. Especially
ok,
I saw some violation passing by containing only
CLOUDSTACK-ticket-number as message.
I am probably not the best citizen in the world but this freaks me, so
this is a reminder to everyone to add a message (and for committers to
refuse submissions without it?)
thanks,
Daan
On Thu, Aug 15,
Ok, thanks.
--
David La Motta
Technical Marketing Engineer - Citrix Solutions | NetApp
david.lamo...@netapp.com
On 8/15/13 2:29 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
Probably closer to feature freeze (9/30)
On 8/14/13 8:02 AM, La Motta, David david.lamo...@netapp.com
Hi everyone,
I've only been working on CS for about 8 months now, so I don't have a lot
of experience with the way releases go.
My question is this: I've noticed over 100 commits to 4.2 since Monday (one
week from a potential release of the product). Is this normal? Unless we
have a super great
As I look in to this, it looks like the problem definitely comes from switching
Jetty from using the target/...4.3.0/ to target/generated-webapp/
The maven-war-plugin creates all the war files in
target/cloud-client-ui-4.3.0-SNAPSHOT/ then copies *some* of it to
target/generated-webapp/ from
Mike,
I have similar concern as well.
We have regression and BVT tests running daily on 4.2 branch locally besides
manual validation of the defects and impacted areas. Even though we would not
be able to catch all the issues, several regressions were caught and you can
see the defects by
Good catch, yeah the 404s are caused because those plugins do not have any .css
file associated with them. I can probably just add a few blank .css files to
silence the errors, though otherwise they are harmless.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: La Motta, David
H,
I want to change the code using getHost() to use
BroadcastDomainType.getValue() for getting the id of the network (vlan
or otherwise). Also I need to change code that uses URI.create(String)
into using BroadcastDomainType.fromString(String) or the generic T
BroadcastDomainType.value.toUri(T).
H Mike,
Make sure you write plenty of unit tests for whatever methods you need
for the features you are implementing. You can not exaggerate for a
while. Coverage is behind quite a bit and I am not a betting man, so I
bet there is going to be a 4.2.1.
In short: I share your concern.
Daan
On
I plan to write automated system tests, but I don't think there's any way
for me to check them in and get use out of them because they require a
SolidFire SAN. In other words, I guess I will just have to keep them local
(as in just something I run).
So far, I have manual regression tests I run
Hugo has a local jenkins that runs as code gets checked in at apache,
You could have your SolidFire SAN base install be updated by a trigger
on commits in the central git at apache's, and then run your
regression tests on it.
Hope that helps,
Daan
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski
+1
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 11:58 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] git commit messages
ok,
I saw some violation passing by containing only CLOUDSTACK-ticket-number
as message.
I am
Good idea, Daan.
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Hugo has a local jenkins that runs as code gets checked in at apache,
You could have your SolidFire SAN base install be updated by a trigger
on commits in the central git at apache's, and then run
Hello,
I'm working with KVM | CloudStack 4.1.1 | CentOS 6.4, I am running into a issue
where it goes through all the motions of setting up just fine. However, I
notice when it attempts to download the CentOS template it fails, with error
message: No Route To Host. I am utilizing two subnets
Okay, thanks folks. 4 +1 votes, 3 of which are binding. The vote is a
success. I will apply the patch.
On 5 August 2013 22:43, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Hi dev,
I have some more by-law changes to propose. This is essentially round 2
for these changes. I incorporated feedback
Thanks Hugo. Will wrap this up now!
On 13 August 2013 06:30, Hugo Trippaers htrippa...@schubergphilis.comwrote:
+1
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 aug. 2013, at 20:01, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Bumping the thread for a 3rd +1 vote from the PMC. Our by-laws
Devs,
Got some more cosmetic edits to make. :) I noticed that our by-laws look
pretty crapy at the moment, as we're not actually marking up the headers
properly.
cf. http://cloudstack.apache.org/bylaws.html
Per the by-laws, we're using a lazy majority for this vote. Please cast
your vote now. I
You may be able to leverage the devcloud-kvm configuration as a
reference. You can either use marvin to deploy an edited version of
tools/devcloud-kvm/devcloud-kvm-advanced.cfg (just swapping out your
ip address ranges), or take a look at the example advanced KVM network
configs that I sent out
As some of you might have noticed, I've been breaking apart code in the server
package. Code that is crucial to orchestration such as life cycle management
of virtual entities and orchestrating plugins to implement the virtual entities
on the physical hardware are being moved into the engine
Hi Christopher,
Could you take a quick look at the permissions on scripts in the ./client
folder?
I raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3650, because the
Maven project that launched Jetty does not set execution permissions for
scripts in
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13610/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4359
Repository:
I have reviewed the links you provided (namely one nick) I made the interfaces
as described, however, upon starting the setup process it stalls out (failed
network) because cloudstack creates cloudbr0 which is not what I set up,so it
does not pass through the connections. I had to go in a
+1
Cheers,
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 16 aug. 2013, at 01:06, Noah Slater nsla...@apache.org wrote:
Devs,
Got some more cosmetic edits to make. :) I noticed that our by-laws look
pretty crapy at the moment, as we're not actually marking up the headers
properly.
cf.
Actually, I corrected that issue now I am utilizing a /27 subnet which to me
would mean that's more then enough IP's for both management / guest IPs, or am
I wrong in this thinking; it would appear to be as such.
Now upon downloading the 5.5 CentOS image as it does when you set it up, I am
SORRY! I forgot one important thing, I am able to proceed as normal while
utilizing the basic zone. I just want to know why the advanced mode is giving
me grief.
- Maurice
On Aug 16, 2013, at 1:02 AM, Maurice Lawler maurice.law...@me.com wrote:
Actually, I corrected that issue now I am
Agree. The message should indicate the root cause of the problem and the
solution.
-Koushik
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 2:58 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] git commit messages
+1
60 matches
Mail list logo