Dear all,
I and my colleague tried to scrutinize the source code and found the script
which is performing the copying of the snapshot from primary storage to
secondary storage on this file:
./plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/storage/KVMStorageProcessor.java
Specifically
Where will the docs commited to the master become available? This probably
isn't the only case where commits have been lost?
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath
radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote:
4.2 docs are from 4.2 branch.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/#review26858
---
test/integration/component/test_templates.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14076/#review26860
---
This test is a duplicate of test_06_copy_template test in the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14227/#review26862
---
Commit bb7493775c202f9a0345482b7a9cb478ed48ba11 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14227/#review26861
---
Commit 4392a47d1dfac656e645ac7620ac95a839745a29 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14227/#review26863
---
Ship it!
4.2
commit 4392a47d1dfac656e645ac7620ac95a839745a29
Put together some basic reports here for 4.2.1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
Please, try to work on your tickets if you have one, if not see if you can pick
up some unassigned.
-abhi
Marty,
As I understand the master branch for docs will be filled as work on
it starts. the ones in the 4.2 branch are the current ones.
btw commits get hidden, rarely lost :p
regards,
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com wrote:
Where will the docs commited to the
Hey Darren,
you daredevil you
I agree that it should be possible and I want it. My focus is with the
VPC routers. They should be redundant and highly available.
I like your take of creating a new provider/element though I think it
is necessary for the whole system to provide this at any time.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14459/
---
(Updated Oct. 10, 2013, 10:23 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
Hi folks,
The organizing committee of CCC Amsterdam put up a tentative schedule for the
conference:
http://cloudstackcollab.org/schedule
We will be contacting speakers individually to get confirmation, explain a few
details and settle the schedule.
In the meantime you can look it up and see
On 10/10/2013 08:06 AM, Indra Pramana wrote:
Dear all,
I and my colleague tried to scrutinize the source code and found the script
which is performing the copying of the snapshot from primary storage to
secondary storage on this file:
Hi,
I've added some missing documentation on how our build systems
(jenkins) are setup. I think I've addressed most questions that came
up in threads on this mailing list. If you would like to understand
how all this is setup please go through the following wiki pages: I've
put in pictures and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14531/#review26864
---
Commit d5eda578cd1dafe24d6ab3b633113468acbecd4f in branch
Thanks Prasanna,
should we publish some 'latest' docs or is this not desirable? We
could do with links to the artifacts, i imagine.
Daan
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I've added some missing documentation on how our build systems
(jenkins)
By latest you mean something in those pages is outdated? I haven't
documented all the jobs yet.
I think it would be nice to add links to our community repositories
etc. Is this what you mean by artifacts?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:17:13PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
Thanks Prasanna,
should
by latest i mean the results of jenkins doc build jobs.
and yes I mean either copy the build results to the site or the wiki
on the one hand and just set links to the artifacts in jenkins on the
other hand.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
By latest you
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:15:23PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
Per our earlier discussion, now that 4.2 has released, I moved the
docs for 4.2 to their own repo, and will be doing the same for master
in the next day or so as I clean things up.
The new repo is:
Multivendor snapshotting:
The case with two storage providers is a bit trickier and is one that we are
still working on. I believe there are a couple options on the table:
-Give both storage providers the option to take the snapshot and fail if either
one fails or cannot take the snapshot
-Give
Should be okay for the moment. Except we forget updating links on the
wiki with jenkins changing. But I wouldn't point these to the users as
'working' documentation. We should get the corrected docs on the site.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 02:26:22PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote:
by latest i mean the
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:57:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 03:15:23PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
Per our earlier discussion, now that 4.2 has released, I moved the
docs for 4.2 to their own repo, and will be doing the same for master
in the next day or so as
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14320/
---
(Updated Oct. 10, 2013, 12:57 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
I wonder if this technique is only going to work for NFS?
In the block world, the VDI we take a snapshot of on the SR will lead to
the creation of another VDI and a block system cannot just snapshot the
hypervisor snapshot - it needs to snapshot the entire volume (which is
analogous to the SR).
I went ahead and removed all setters from *JoinVOs this morning and played
around in my environment. There were no compile errors since nobody called
those setters, everything seems to be working just fine and there aren't any
errors in any of the logs.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how
Hm, that is tricky. I haven't looked into block stuff too much, but maybe we
can…
-Create another temporary lun , register it as a SR/DS
-Move the active VM to that SR
-Ask the storage driver to snapshot.
-Move the active VM back to the original SR
-Delete the temporary lun and SR
-Delete the
Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear on the
publican changes. Can someone take a look and fix the publican
arguments?
Current looking at this.
midonet, niciranvp and release notes are back building.
Should be able to get the quick install guide back up too, I had to
Sorry it has taken me a bit to reply, Simon.
Right now, it sounds like you have a couple options.
1) There is an interface called 'SnapshotStrategy', which would allow you to
write a plugin becoming the authority on how to take, backup and revert
snapshots. This should give you the appropriate
Have the 4.2 branch changes been merged into master now?
Which branch should we be submitting patches off of?
Travis
On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:10 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear on the
publican changes. Can someone take a look
Hi All - Looks like the server won't come up on master
(CLOUDSTACK-4848). It started happening since last night. Is this
something anyone else is seeing? I'm hitting it regularly on the test
environment. The DatabaseUpgradeChecker is complaining about a
duplicate column `size` in an upgrade
Hi,
I am receiving tons of emails from jenkins about broken builds, but my
local build is ok and no tests failing, Is this some environment issue?
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All - Looks like the server won't come up on master
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14577/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
Yes it's mostly an implementation issue. We evaluated the situation and
think it's too complex and too much effort to enable HA plus VRRP, so we
decide to drop HA to simply and make things more stable.
Here are some reference of how RvR works, hope it would help.
4.2 and all of those changes should hit master as well. 4.2 should ==
master at the moment.
--David
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Travis Graham tgra...@tgraham.us wrote:
Have the 4.2 branch changes been merged into master now?
Which branch should we be submitting patches off of?
Travis
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear on the
publican changes. Can someone take a look and fix the publican
arguments?
Current looking at this.
midonet, niciranvp and release notes are back building.
Having missed the deadline, are there any openings?
-JM
- Original Message -
Hi folks,
The organizing committee of CCC Amsterdam put up a tentative schedule for the
conference:
http://cloudstackcollab.org/schedule
We will be contacting speakers individually to get
My initial tendency here is to stick with standard hypervisor snapshots for
4.3 for block storage.
I am curious how this work pans out, though, so I plan to keep up to date
with it.
Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 9:06 AM, SuichII, Christopher
chris.su...@netapp.com wrote:
Hm, that is
Response inline...
On 10 Oct 2013 18:27, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear on the
publican changes. Can someone take a look and fix the publican
arguments?
I just went back through the release guide an nowhere could I find any mention
of the template upgrade and workaround process for KVM host based CloudStack
upgrading from 4.1 to 4.2. I also took a look through the troubleshooting
section. I might just be missing it, but using the steps in the
Personally, I am +1 on the coarse grain interface, and totally agree with your
points.
As long as we separate vmsnasphotmanager and vmsnapshotstrategy, and provide
enough helper functions(such as quiesce / un-quiesce vm) for vendors, then
write a new vmsnapshotStrategy should be easy.
I'm still curious how multiple VM snapshot strategies are resolved? What
happens if two vendors write a VM strategy and the VM you're taking a
snapshot of has disks provided by multiple vendors.
Chris had some ideas on this.
I'll be interested to see where this goes.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at
After reviewing the UI on the latest master, I noticed that the 'add account'
dialog was changed substantially, and converted to a custom UI widget.
Additionally, the password confirm field validation is broken, so I am unable
to add a new account.
Can I know the reason this was converted to a
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Response inline...
On 10 Oct 2013 18:27, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Actually I think the jobs are broken now. I'm not too clear on the
publican
+1
-Original Message-
From: Brian Federle
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 12:55 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; Jessica Wang; Sonny Chhen
Subject: RE: UI accounts wizard broken
Also, I am referring to this commit. I do not remember any active UI comitters
I just opened a request with infra for that (and for cloudmonkey):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6857
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote:
Hi,
I want to submit CloudStack Plugin guide for VXLAN Plugin,
but there isn't cloudstack-doc repo in
Thank you!
Noji
2013/10/10 Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com:
I just opened a request with infra for that (and for cloudmonkey):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6857
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Yoshikazu Nojima m...@ynojima.net wrote:
Hi,
I want to submit
Hi there,
Not sure if others experience the same issue. In 4.2, when MS starts, it will
discover the IP address of MS and automatically set global setting host to
that IP address. Now it seems broken on master, MS started but host is still
set to localhost, which caused my system vm cannot
If my memory serves me right this was fixed in 4.2. Maybe the fixer forgot
to port it to master ?
On 10/10/13 2:46 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi there,
Not sure if others experience the same issue. In 4.2, when MS starts, it
will discover the IP address of MS and automatically set
HmmŠ I think that it may be related to new ConfigDepot framework to
support dynamic config value without restarting MS.
-min
On 10/10/13 3:00 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
If my memory serves me right this was fixed in 4.2. Maybe the fixer forgot
to port it to master ?
On
Hey Marcus,
I haven't had a chance to test this yet, but I thought you might be
interested in the merge of your work with mine.
I've also replaced the direct CHAP parameters with a MapString, String
(which currently only stores the CHAP credentials, but could be used for
more in the future).
I
I see it on Windows too.
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 4:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Min Chen
Subject: Re: Global setting host is not set to MS IP anymore on master
Importance: High
I'm facing
On Oct 10, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Kelcey Jamison Damage
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
I just went back through the release guide an nowhere could I find any
mention of the template upgrade and workaround process for KVM host based
CloudStack upgrading from 4.1 to 4.2. I also took a look
I can patch in what I have been told, but I don't understand what I have been
told so I know most of the people I help on irc won't get it either. Once I
find what appears to be a digestible solution I will happily look into patching
the docs.
- Original Message -
From: Sebastien
Hi All,
Here the BVT automation result on KVM, You can see the result @
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/898/
Delete template test case failed this runs, we need to look that (I didn't
tested manually this failure)
Issues reported with last run still
Any idea when we can get fix for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4825 ?
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 7:42 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Latest Master DB
I made a bunch of updates, Marcus:
https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/incubator-cloudstack/commit/c13442eaa228a5ae37d3b13f6c98636de158a908
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hey Marcus,
I haven't had a chance to test this yet, but I thought
Dear all,
I am reading the documentation on the steps in building DEB packages for
CloudStack 4.2.0:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/sect-source-builddebs.html
and compare it with the steps on the earlier version (e.g. 4.1.1):
Hi Wido,
Good day to you, and thank you for your e-mail reply.
Thank you for your advice. We will try to tweak the code to throttle the
copying process to the secondary storage server.
Cheers.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
On 10/10/2013 08:06
Can you tell me what job is doing that? I'm not sure which one is
emailing people. We shouldn't be emailing anything from
jenkins.buildacloud to individuals unless they ask to be.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 07:00:27PM +0200, Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
Hi,
I am receiving tons of emails from jenkins
So, why does setting the 'host' to your IP not work? I do that for the
test environment on master as part of deployment via marvin. It's only
a small change in the marvin-config.
On https://github.com/vogxn/cloud-autodeploy.git
commit 8fe580e82fe4ab6dd8e124bf226c5941e72a4204
Author: Prasanna
Hi Rayees,
Thanks for stepping up to send this report. Can we use the
jenkins2email [1] script I wrote for this email? The format gets
messed up when you copy paste from jenkins.
Also the result here is not that of KVM. KVM is actually broken on
master, the addHost seems to be failing to bring
61 matches
Mail list logo
