I have update the wiki as well. Should have looked at this mail sooner
:) Also is it possible to rename the install-non-oss.sh file to
install-noredist.sh ?
Thanks,
-Syed
On Sat 21 Sep 2013 01:19:46 AM EDT, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
All,
I've merged the branch to master.
Please beware that the
That sounds like a good plan to me.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
There is also a lot of static initialization. I don't know exactly
what was the issue that broke the build, but I assume its because
Transaction(Legacy) got loaded, and
Hi Guys,
During the upgrade process I also kept experiencing the packages needed
disappearing from the cloudstack.apt-get.eu website, this caused multiple
servers to fail on update/install processes only to work several minutes
later once the files had been restored. It's clear the files are
Hi Guys,
Following the issues I have had upgrading to 4.2.0, I have noticed that the
known issues filter in Jira is set to used fixedVersion as opposed to
affectedVersion. This changes the results dramatically, if I was able to
see any of the issues I was having using this filter I believe the
Thanks Kelcey, that worked a treat!
Do you know of any plans to update the official documentation?
Marty
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 1:16 AM, kel...@backbonetechnology.com
kel...@backbonetechnology.com wrote:
Hi,
Try this, it was written for your situation!
h mailinglists,
There is no maintenance mode for secondary storage at this time. Make
sure no snapshot is being taken or virtual machine is being
instantiated at the time and shutdown the ms. there is no other way at
the time.
(mailinglists is not a very inviting from address to respond to, just
Hi,
Is there any update on this?
My commit
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/f5e7f46dadda741f10e5b674d0578ade9ba719d7
made
it into the 4.2.0 docs but
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/922ef76224d4a8534f67f47b97cf664e5c65ecba
hasn't,
I have gone to use this several times just
H Noah,
I recall entering a ticket for infra, and forgot about it. I suppose
you are talking about markmail. I don't know how to change the setting
for it. I'll do some follow up. (anybody knows what the management
acoount for the apache markmail account is?)
regards,
Daan
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013
Not yet. This is a 'hack'. Officially the process is to download update
templates as step 1, before the stuff in the release notes.
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: Marty Sweet msweet@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 4.2.0 Upgrade
I don't know how to change the setting for it.
Should just be a case of modifying the form action within that page.
I can go ahead and do it if there are no objections.
I don't know if a similar thing has been talked about before but I
thought I'd just throws this out there. The ultimate way to ensure
quality is that we have unit test and integration test coverage on all
functionality. That way somebody authors some code, commits to, for
example, 4.2, but then
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
modifying the form action within that page.
I have no idea what you are talking about, so please do.
Sorry, just looked at this more.
I made the false assumption that the lists for org.apache.cloudstack-*
already existed on mailmark and that it was just a matter of switching the
search form.
On 27 October 2013 16:05, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:19
infra told me to contact markmail so i submitted a request at the
markmail site for help.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Sorry, just looked at this more.
I made the false assumption that the lists for org.apache.cloudstack-*
already existed on mailmark and
I believe this will be very useful for users.
As far as I understand someone will have to qualify components. What will
be the method for qualification? I do not think simply the test coverage
would be right. But then if you want to go deeper, then you need a bigger
effort testing the components.
Hi Guys,
When you get a moment can you test to see if this bug exists on your
setups? Wondering if it is a coding issue or a DB inconsistency.
Reproduce:
1) Infrastructure Hosts (View All) Click Host Edit
2) Change OS Preference to Ubuntu
3) Save
4) Refresh go back into menu, it is Ubuntu
I think it can't be at a component level because components are too large. It
needs to be at a feature for implementation level. For example, live storage
migration for xen and live storage migration for kvm (don't know if that's a
real thing) would be two separate items.
Darren
On Oct
http://markmail.org/message/b4l22x3gxw6ccb47 client issue - no tomcat
deployment by Kevin Yeandel
http://markmail.org/message/yby5o6rgsffnnitv Traffic Type : public
gone when using SG and advanced network by Bjoern Teipel
http://markmail.org/message/s4mbftpgjmkilmcu Building 4.2 -nonoss by
Fred
http://markmail.org/message/fekg3fk6h6yqvbvl Error Codes\ Export
Import Config by
Santhosh Edukulla
Here the BVT automation result on KVM, You can see the result @
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa/job/test-smoke-matrix/992/
Looks like there is regression while delete network; network test cases failed
to delete network; unfortunately I don't have setup to test this
Ok, makes sense, but that sounds like even more work :) Can you share the
plan on how will this work?
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Darren Shepherd
darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it can't be at a component level because components are too large.
It needs to be at a feature
It would be really nice if the API failed if cloudmonkey exited with
!=0 exit code. I've been scripting some stuff with cloud monkey and
this makes it difficult. It would also be nice to somehow specific
which field you want printed. So when I do a create command I can say
just echo id value
Here's the assignVirtualMachine response json from log:
2013-10-25 17:02:54,107 - cloudmonkey.py:83 - [DEBUG] Loaded config fields:
['cache_file=/root/.cloudmonkey/cache',
'log_file=/root/.cloudmonkey/log', 'asyncblock=true',
'paramcompletion=false', 'history_file=/root/.cloudmonkey/history',
Is there a tool for migrating from existing xenserver pool into cloudstack?
---
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
accompanying attachment(s)
is intended only for
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:49:35PM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote:
It would be really nice if the API failed if cloudmonkey exited with
!=0 exit code. I've been scripting some stuff with cloud monkey and
this makes it difficult. It would also be nice to somehow specific
which field you want
We need a way to check coverage of (unit+integration) tests. How many
lines of code hit on a deployed system that corresponds to the
component donated/committed. We don't have that for existing tests so
it makes it hard to judge if a feature that comes with tests covers
enough of itself.
On Sun,
Hi All,
I am trying to run code coverage tool with Marvin framework; basically I want
to find how much percentage our product's code covered in Marvin automation
including BVT and regression.
Seems there are few tools to perform code coverage with black automation;
with those tools you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14827/#review27588
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Oct. 23, 2013, 11:05 a.m.,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 05:07:36AM +, Rayees Namathponnan wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to run code coverage tool with Marvin framework;
basically I want to find how much percentage our product's code
covered in Marvin automation including BVT and regression.
Seems there are few tools
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14199/
---
(Updated Oct. 28, 2013, 5:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14426/
---
(Updated Oct. 28, 2013, 5:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Rajesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13841/
---
(Updated Oct. 28, 2013, 5:54 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/14925/#review27589
---
tools/marvin/marvin/marvinPlugin.py
33 matches
Mail list logo
