RE: ACS 4.2: list networks returns empty, if a VN is created without net mask

Hello Vinod, I tried it with felton\4.3. I didn't see any exception here. Below are the steps I followed: Note1: 1. Login to CS UI, navigate to Network->Add Isolated Network. So, basically it called "createNetwork" API. 2. Filled in all other fields, Entered GatewayIp with out specifying netmas

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #374

See Changes: [girish] CLOUDSTACK-5627: Removed a validation which expected createVPCOffering to fail if SourceNAT not provided -- [...truncated 2152 lines...] [JENKINS] Recording test results

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor KVM #374

See -- [INFO] [INFO] --

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #373

See Changes: [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-5552 Set private gateway state to ready on delete failure -- [...truncated 2152 lines...] [JENKINS] Recording test results [INFO]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor KVM #373

See -- [INFO] [INFO] --

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #290

See Changes: [girish] CLOUDSTACK-5627: Removed a validation which expected createVPCOffering to fail if SourceNAT not provided -- [...truncated 1999 lines...]

Re: CreateVPCOffering API without SourceNat service

Thanks a lot Alena ! Regards, Girish On 07-Jan-2014, at 10:58 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > Yes, it does as sourceNat is required service for VPC > > -Alena. > > From: Girish Shilamkar > Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" > Date: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 at 6:46 AM > To: "dev@cloudstac

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #289

See Changes: [jayapal] CLOUDSTACK-5552 Setup private gateway state to ready on delete failure -- [...truncated 1999 lines...] --

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hypervisor KVM #372

See -- [INFO] [INFO] --

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #372

See Changes: [girish] CLOUDSTACK-5805: Increasing timeout period for VM to come to running state [girish] CLOUDSTACK-5802: Increased timeout for template state to become ready, improved assertion messages --

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #288

See Changes: [girish] CLOUDSTACK-5802: Increased timeout for template state to become ready, improved assertion messages -- [...truncated 1999 lines...] --

Review Request 16730: Add usage event detials for vm state transitions when using custom compute offering.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16730/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5742 http

Review Request 16729: CLOUDSTACK-4904: Unable to see a derieved template if the parent template is deleted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16729/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4904 https:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #287

See Changes: [girish] CLOUDSTACK-5805: Increasing timeout period for VM to come to running state -- [...truncated 2003 lines...] log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2

Re: Review Request 16684: CLOUDSTACK-5802: Increased timeout for template state to become ready, improved assertion messages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16684/#review31344 --- Commit f561e126b29b38df3bbc533cc2ce6fb7e56514b9 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16684: CLOUDSTACK-5802: Increased timeout for template state to become ready, improved assertion messages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16684/#review31345 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On Jan.

Re: Review Request 16684: CLOUDSTACK-5802: Increased timeout for template state to become ready, improved assertion messages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16684/#review31343 --- Commit 944358706d31c9f0f08749d8794816879aeaa8b5 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16683: CLOUDSTACK-5805: Increasing timeout period for VM to come to running state

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16683/#review31341 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On Jan.

Re: Review Request 16683: CLOUDSTACK-5805: Increasing timeout period for VM to come to running state

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16683/#review31342 --- Commit d2ddf62679a39ce81d9c780fd8a16de8666f89e9 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16683: CLOUDSTACK-5805: Increasing timeout period for VM to come to running state

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16683/#review31340 --- Commit 6580f885234ee93bc12f2ab9724bd1033fa46544 in branch refs/heads

RE: [Proposal] Switch to Java 7

+1 for java 1.7 -Original Message- From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2014 4:50 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Switch to Java 7 +1 for java 1.7 and resource blocks, it will help to simplify On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at

RE: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire

I am also using it. Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] > Sent: 08 January 2014 01:37 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire > > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Frank Zhang wrote

Re: Review Request 16642: Contrail plguin fixes for CS 4.3

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16642/ --- (Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 11:40 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository:

Re: [Proposal] Switch to Java 7

+1 for java 1.7 and resource blocks, it will help to simplify On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > I would be in favor as well. In addition to the already discussed reasons, > I think it would be good to try to get our users to a well maintained > version of Java. From a sec

Re: [Proposal] Switch to Java 7

I would be in favor as well. In addition to the already discussed reasons, I think it would be good to try to get our users to a well maintained version of Java. From a security point of view 1.6 is not a smart choice any more. Upgrading to Jdk 7 could also trigger an upgrade to tomcat 7. Best p

Re: [Proposal] Switch to Java 7

+1 for switching to Java 7 in CloudStack 4.4. Kelven On 1/6/14, 10:27 PM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: >Just to repeat what has been discussed some time ago. > >All the current Long Term Support distributions have Java 7 available. > >RHEL6, RHEL7, Ubuntu 12.04, Ubuntu 14.04 (due in April) will

Re: VMware snapshot question

Mike, Thanks for digging into the details, I’ll check it out after I’m done with my current things in hand Kelven On 1/7/14, 11:50 AM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Hi Kelven, > >I checked in ecd4a9c6424be73b24a44c73f04c67c47e1611e8. > >Creating, deleting, and reverting to VMware snapshots appears

RE: 4.3 : Developer Profile, tools module commented

Has gotten it back f0ad14e23574041ee75eb4e34bdbab69f05c909b thanks > -Original Message- > From: Santhosh Edukulla [mailto:santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, January 06, 2014 10:07 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: 4.3 : Developer Profile, tools module commented

Re: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire

I am using the license as well. Thanks, -Nitin On 07/01/14 10:54 AM, "Frank Zhang" wrote: >I am > >> -Original Message- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 7:18 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Committer license for

Re: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > I'm using the committer license. > > -Brian ACK - I'll send it off list when I get it.

Re: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire

On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Frank Zhang wrote: > I am ACK - I'll send it off list when I get it.

Re: VMware snapshot question

Hi Kelven, I checked in ecd4a9c6424be73b24a44c73f04c67c47e1611e8. Creating, deleting, and reverting to VMware snapshots appears to work now, but feel free to try it out of course. :) Talk to you later On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Loo

RE: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire

I'm using the committer license. -Brian -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 7:18 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire Hey folks, The free license we have for IntelliJ f

RE: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire

I am > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 7:18 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire > > Hey folks, > > The free license we have for IntelliJ for committers is s

[ACS 4.3] RC update

Folks Happy new year everyone. I hope you all had a good recharging time off during holiday. I want to bring our attention and focus to getting the 4.3 release out the door. While our scheduled RC date is this Friday 1/10 but we still have many open blocker and critical. Please review your back

Re: VMware snapshot question

Looks like deleting a VMware snapshot was suffering from the same problem as creating a VMware snapshot. I was able to solve both problems the same way. Now I'm going to look into reverting to a VMware snapshot. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wro

Re: createSnapshot API always returns success

For what it is worth, a very similar issue is occurring for deleting snapshots. However, that issue is only with the UI. -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Data Center Platforms – Cloud Solutions Citrix, Cisco & Red Hat On Jan 7, 2014, at 10:08 AM, SuichII, Christoph

Re: VMware snapshot question

I logged a bug for this: 1. CLOUDSTACK-5823 I assigned this to myself. I believe I've corrected the issue with taking a VMware snapshot, but I want to look into the delete and revert code, as well. On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Mi

Re: CreateVPCOffering API without SourceNat service

Yes, it does as sourceNat is required service for VPC -Alena. From: Girish Shilamkar mailto:gir...@clogeny.com>> Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Tuesday, January 7, 2014 at 6:46 AM To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Review Request 16688: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16688/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Repository: cloudstack-git Description ---

Re: Review Request 16688: console-proxy add support of AltGr key and FR azerty keyboard

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16688/ --- (Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 4:28 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack. Repository:

Re: Cloudstack 4.2.0 no more available for download on mirrors

Yes; that's my fault. I'll get the page corrected shortly. --David On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 11:11 AM, benoit lair wrote: > Hello Daan! > > Okay i can get them from this location. Can continue going onto my demo :) > > However the links are broken starting from this page > http://cloudstack.apache.

Re: [MERGE] Opendaylight plugin

+1 Hugo. Looking forward if I can do anything for that plugin. --Tuna On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:45 PM, sebgoa wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2014, at 9:03 AM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > I would like to merge the branch open daylight into master. This branch > contains a plugin with an

Re: Cloudstack 4.2.0 no more available for download on mirrors

Hello Daan! Okay i can get them from this location. Can continue going onto my demo :) However the links are broken starting from this page http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html 2014/1/7 Daan Hoogland > here for instance? > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/ > > I got there via http

Re: Cloudstack 4.2.0 no more available for download on mirrors

here for instance? http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/rhel/4.2/ I got there via http://cloudstack.apache.org/ On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:34 PM, benoit lair wrote: > Hello Guys!! > > > I was trying to download acs 4.2 in order to install anoter instance for > demonstration. > > However, the sources nor t

Cloudstack 4.2.0 no more available for download on mirrors

Hello Guys!! I was trying to download acs 4.2 in order to install anoter instance for demonstration. However, the sources nor the rpms are no more available for download for acs 4.2, i got only acs 4.1.1 and acs 4.2.1 with only the sources So the downloads links on the http://cloudstack.apache.

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

Sachin, I will look at it and propose some. @Marcus can you send me some description/stacktrace/log on how your testcase fails. regards On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Sachchidanand Vaidya wrote: > Hi, > Bug CS-5502 was fixed (12/20/13) and then reopened (12/26/13) again since > for > Vla

Committer license for IntelliJ set to expire

Hey folks, The free license we have for IntelliJ for committers is set to expire in Feb. I've been in contact with them, and can request a new license when it gets closer to that time. For those of you (committers) using the license, please reply to this so that I can get you the renewed license

RE: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

Hi, Bug CS-5502 was fixed (12/20/13) and then reopened (12/26/13) again since for Vlan=UNTAGGED case, createVlanIpRange() API fails with "Vlan id is required when add ip range to the public network". Vlan ="untagged" can be a valid case for public networks (in advanced networking) as is t

createSnapshot API always returns success

It appears that, no matter what, the createSnapshot API will ALWAYS return a success. If you drill down from: VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateTakeVolumeSnapshot() to VolumeServiceImpl.takeSnapshot(), you’ll notice that ANY exception that is thrown inside of SnapshotManager.takeSnapshot() is simp

Re: IPv6 plan - questions

OK. Please include the bullet points from the "ipv6 in vpc" email I sent out. I changed the subject line. On Jan 7, 2014 7:06 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote: > Marcus, > > I am trying to hold your fs against network admins at Schuberg Philis > to see if I have some additions to make. Will let you know

CreateVPCOffering API without SourceNat service

Hello,Does createVPCOffering API by default creates VPC with SourceNat service even if it is not specified in API ?I tried this out where Services  = {DHPC, DNS, PF, VPN, LB, UserData and StaticNat} and called createVPCOffering API. But the API created VPC with SourceNat service even though it was

Re: Database Deployment is failing

Prashant, This should be solved by a patch from a colleague of mine. Can you try please? regards, On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra wrote: > Hi , > > Deploy Db is failing , can someone help me . > > [root@localhost cloudstack]# mvn -P developer -pl developer -Ddeploydb > >

Re: IPv6 plan - questions

Marcus, I am trying to hold your fs against network admins at Schuberg Philis to see if I have some additions to make. Will let you know (through the cwiki or here) once I got more. regards, Daan On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I've put together a rough draft spec: > >

Review Request 16684: CLOUDSTACK-5802: Increased timeout for template state to become ready, improved assertion messages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16684/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5802 h

Review Request 16683: CLOUDSTACK-5805: Increasing timeout period for VM to come to running state

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16683/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5805 h

Re: Review Request 14124: CLOUDSTACK-4622 : If a VM from guest network is added to network tier of VPC then IP reservation allows the CIDR to be a superset of Network CIDR for that VPC tier

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/14124/ --- (Updated Jan. 7, 2014, 11:58 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Jayapal Reddy

Jenkins build is back to stable : build-master #366

See

Jenkins build is back to stable : build-master » Apache CloudStack Plugin - SNMP Alerts #366

See

Jenkins build became unstable: build-master » Apache CloudStack Plugin - SNMP Alerts #365

See

Jenkins build became unstable: build-master #365

See

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

Daan, I see your point and do agree that it does have benefits. I will go ahead with user template approach. Thanks and wishing you and other cloudstackers a happy new year. Thanks Saurav On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Saurav, I do not object against using the systemvm.