Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #1

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/1/ -- [...truncated 541 lines...] Receiving objects: 59% (279377/467146), 72.21 MiB | 212 KiB/s Receiving objects: 59% (279381/467146), 72.53 MiB | 213 KiB/s Receiving

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Marcus Sorensen
I'm not quite following. With our storage, the template gets copied to the storage pool upon first use, and then cloned upon subsequent uses. I don't remember all of the methods immediately, but there's one called to copy the template to primary storage, and once that's done as you mention it's

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Marcus Sorensen
In other words, if you can't clone, then createDiskFromTemplate should copy template from secondary storage directly onto root disk every time, and copyPhysicalDisk really does nothing. If you can clone, then copyPhysicalDisk should copy template to primary, and createDiskFromTemplate should

Re: Feature request: scale up for KVM

2014-01-25 Thread Nux!
On 25.01.2014 04:27, Marcus Sorensen wrote: There are some issues with it. Last I checked, you can hotplug CPUs, but you can't take them away (at least not for Linux guest os). Also, you can scale memory, but it relies on balloon driver, which can simply be unloaded by the guest to have access

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #3

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/3/

Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-25 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Hey all, I’ve made Jenkins run the findbugs analysis on 4.3-forward. Is there somebody who is willing to help triage the findings? Maybe there is some stuff that we need to fix? the url is http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/3/findbugsResult/ Cheers, Hugo

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #382

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist/382/

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-25 Thread Daan Hoogland
H Hugo, I'll spend some time on it tonight. Do you have a work load distribution scheme or is it random access? ;) regards On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: Hey all, I've made Jenkins run the findbugs analysis on 4.3-forward. Is there somebody who is

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-25 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Thanks! Random access. :-) Either push any fixes to the 4.3-forward branch for Animesh to look at, or reply to this mail with the filename you are working on. I won’t working on anything tonight, so feel free to go ahead without the sync. Cheers, Hugo On 25 jan. 2014, at 14:13, Daan

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-25 Thread Hugo Trippaers
I’ve also added a job to master with the Findbugs report and the cobertura code coverage report. Good stuff, we have a 12% coverage of our classes with unit tests. Huge improvement over the last release where we had 4% iirc. We have 306 reports from Findbugs, of which the majority are

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2163

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2163/changes Changes: [laszlo.hornyak] replaced Long instantiations with Autoboxing -- [...truncated 25143 lines...] 980/1332 KB 984/1332 KB 988/1332 KB 992/1332 KB 996/1332 KB

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Mark Hinkle

2014-01-25 Thread Giles Sirett
Congrats Mark - a very long time overdue Kind Regards Giles D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055 giles.sir...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] Sent: 25 January 2014 01:11 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Mark Hinkle

2014-01-25 Thread Mark Hinkle
Thanks I appreciate the vote of confidence. Best Regards, Mark e: mrhin...@apache.org t: @mrhinkle w: www.socializedsoftware.com On Jan 25, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Giles Sirett giles.sir...@shapeblue.com wrote: Congrats Mark - a very long time overdue Kind Regards Giles D: +44 20 3603

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2164

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2164/changes Changes: [laszlo.hornyak] replaced Long instantiation with parseLong [laszlo.hornyak] removed redundant Long, Short, Double, Float and Boolean instantiations -- [...truncated 5501

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #2165

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/2165/changes Changes: [laszlo.hornyak] RAT fix -- [...truncated 5502 lines...] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] ---

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Mark Hinkle

2014-01-25 Thread Paul Angus
Congratulations Mark, well deserved. Regards, Paul Angus S: +44 20 3603 0540tel:+44%2020%203603%200540 | M: +447711418784tel:+447711418784 T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com Original message From: Chip Childers Date:25/01/2014 01:11 (GMT+00:00) To:

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-25 Thread Daan Hoogland
or reply to this mail with the filename you are working on I'll be looking at the server package as it seems to contain the most issues. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote: I’ve also added a job to master with the Findbugs report and the cobertura code

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #5

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/5/changes Changes: [Daan Hoogland] nullpointer dereference guarded -- [...truncated 1325 lines...] [ERROR]

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #6

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/6/changes Changes: [Daan Hoogland] moved call on static object to synchronized block -- [...truncated 1325 lines...] [ERROR]

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #6

2014-01-25 Thread Daan Hoogland
my bad. screwed up some imports and working on the fix. please be patient with me. On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:05 AM, jenk...@cloudstack.org wrote: See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/6/changes Changes: [Daan Hoogland] moved call on static object to

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build #7

2014-01-25 Thread jenkins
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-forward-maven-build/7/changes

Re: Findbugs report on 4.3-forward

2014-01-25 Thread Ian Duffy
Hi, Fixed the issues highlighted in the ldap user authentication package. Have pushed to 4.3-forward. Thanks, Ian On 25 January 2014 22:26, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote: or reply to this mail with the filename you are working on I'll be looking at the server package as it

OpenVswitch | KVM | CentOS 6.5 | Cloudstack 4.2

2014-01-25 Thread Maurice Lawler
Hello, Question, I'm a little confused, following the documentation here: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html I am a little perplexed, do I need to also have eth0.100 - eth0.300 along with cloudbr0 / cloudbr1

OpenVswitch | KVM | CentOS 6.5 | Cloudstack 4.2

2014-01-25 Thread Maurice Lawler
Hello, Question, I'm a little confused, following the documentation here: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html I am a little perplexed, do I need to also have eth0.100 - eth0.300 along with cloudbr0 / cloudbr1

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Mike Tutkowski
Thanks for your input, Marcus. Yeah, the SolidFire SAN has the ability to clone, but I can't use it in this case. Little note first: I'm going to put some words below in capital letters to stress some important details. All caps for some words can be annoying to some, so please understand that I

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Mike Tutkowski
On a side note, as I mentioned, to get QoS on a CloudStack-volume-by-CloudStack-volume basis, we need to use a single SAN volume per CloudStack volume (because QoS is set at the SAN volume level) and copy the template in question to each volume every time a new root disk is need. This, however,

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Not's not really what I was describing, or that's not how we do it at least. The first time a template is used, we create an SR with one VDI (using your terminology as we don't do it in Xen, but it should map to essentially the same thing) and copy the template contents into it. Then we remove the

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Marcus Sorensen
And when I say 'the first time the template is used, we create an SR', I mean cloudstack does it automatically. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen shadow...@gmail.com wrote: Not's not really what I was describing, or that's not how we do it at least. The first time a template is

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Mike Tutkowski
I see, Marcus. That is an interesting idea definitely. The process would be on a cluster-by-cluster basis: 1) Download the template to the SR. 2) Clone the SAN volume. 3) Use the new SR. Later for a new root disk: Just do 3. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Marcus Sorensen

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Mike Tutkowski
2) This is cloning the SAN volume that stores the SR in 1). 3) This is to use the SR on the cloned volume. On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: I see, Marcus. That is an interesting idea definitely. The process would be on a

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Mike Tutkowski
So, Marcus - it sounds like you already have this kind of functionality working in KVM? Perhaps it would be a good idea for me to look at it. Thanks! On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote: 2) This is cloning the SAN volume that stores the SR in

Re: Root-disk support for managed storage

2014-01-25 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Actually, I shouldn't take the liberty to speak as though I understand the details about how you use SRs and VDIs. My point though is basically that you probably can and should treat them the same as whatever you currently do with data disks. Either create a new one with every root volume create