Sure Hugo, I will enable assertions for the next run.
Thanks,
~Talluri
On 06/02/14 12:55 am, Hugo Trippaers trip...@gmail.com wrote:
Talluri,
Is it possible to enable assertions in the functional tests (-ae flag on
the jvm). That way we get some feedback on the internal issues. I'm
seeing some
On Feb 6, 2014, at 11:53 PM, d...@soleks.com wrote:
it's 4.2.1
bug ?
Dan, definitely. It may also apply to 4.3, so please tag both
thanks
On Feb 6, 2014, at 3:31 PM, d...@soleks.com wrote:
Hi @dev,
There is some minor issue with UI, i think it's controlled by some
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 9:56 PM
To: Alena Prokharchyk
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; eiz...@infoblox.com
Subject: Re: commit 6523c068695d0431070060667c222eb40d54b14d breaks
network removal
second
Hey David,
I would make a distinction between code issues and functional issues.
Occasionally somebody just plainly breaks the build, i’m guilty of that myself
actually, and thats just plain stupid. Luckily we have Jenkins to catch these
errors quickly. I’m in a continuous struggle with
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Alena,
The revert didn't apply. Would the folowing do the trick?
if (vm.getType() == Type.User
network.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest
network.getGuestType() ==
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:25:03AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
1. code restructuring ,definitely yes, it makes little neat and
plugin does not worry much about deploy altogether. Take an example
of load option, it is little redundant i believe, if user passes the
deploy flag, deploy
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17736/#review33921
---
server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17736/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 9:26 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, John Burwell
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15932/#review33922
---
My sincere apologies Niels! I completely missed the second version
CIL
From: Prasanna Santhanam [t...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing deploy\load options from marvinplugin
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:25:03AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
1. code
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17840/
---
Review request for cloudstack, John Burwell and Murali Reddy.
Bugs:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 09:36:49AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
From: Prasanna Santhanam [t...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Removing deploy\load options from marvinplugin
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:25:03AM +, Santhosh
On Feb. 7, 2014, 10:33 a.m., Wido den Hollander wrote:
My sincere apologies Niels! I completely missed the second version of your
patch!
I just took a look at it again and it seems pretty straight forward. Most
of the RBD code did a lot of work for you, so it's fairly easy to have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16385/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 10:30 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and daan
LS,
in PrivateIpDaoImpl a null pointer is returned when no db object can be found:
@Override
public PrivateIpVO allocateIpAddress(long dcId, long networkId,
String requestedIp) {
...
PrivateIpVO vo = lockOneRandomRow(sc, true);
if (vo == null) {
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16385/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 10:30 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and daan
thanks Murali, will do
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:58 AM, murali reddy muralimmre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.comwrote:
Alena,
The revert didn't apply. Would the folowing do the trick?
if (vm.getType() == Type.User
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17841/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5959
I discussed with Antonio internally; we are in diagreement.
I would like to see some kind of context diagram inside java class javadocs.
Antonio would go for a seperate file (on package level, Antonio?)
any others have brain waves on this?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
ignore, i will resend in the right thread
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I discussed with Antonio internally; we are in diagreement.
I would like to see some kind of context diagram inside java class javadocs.
Antonio would go for a seperate file
I discussed with Antonio internally; we are in diagreement.
I would like to see some kind of context diagram inside java class javadocs.
Antonio would go for a seperate file (on package level, Antonio?)
any others have brain waves on this?
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Antonio Fornié
Have any changes been made to the deployment of the systemvm-4.3.0.iso between
RC2 and RC3 ??
I can't get a system VMs to fully start in hyperv or xenserver - all issues
seem to relate to the systemvm-4.3.0.iso - which doesn't seem to be making
across to primary storage in hyper-v or properly
Hope this is not blocking at the moment so I can take the time to add
a unit test. If not I have the code ready to ship. please bug me.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks Murali, will do
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:58 AM, murali reddy
Hi Paul,
For hyper-v, if older systemvm iso is present with the same name then it'll not
get updated. You can remove the systemvm directory from secondary storage. Also
on you hyper-v host, systemvm.iso gets put on
RootDrive:\Users\Public\Documents\Hyper-V directory. You can delete it. When
a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/
---
(Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 11:19 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17842/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33924
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On Feb. 7, 2014, 4:49 p.m.,
Thanks for the info Devdeep,
so yes the systemvm iso is getting copied to the local disk, but I'm getting
the following error:
ERROR HypervResource.HypervResourceController
[6b05182a-efa1-4105-bc5c-0a49c55674f0] - com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand fail
on exceptionObject reference not set to
Hi all,
Firewall rule creation and Enabling static NAT rule for Portable public IP
are failing, and is observed in daily build too. It was masked by other
cascading failures for which I have already added patch (
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17841/).
I have observed these issues on VMware yet
I believe we are deviating with too many notes here. Lets put things in
perspective.
1. Initial point was to understand and take inputs to have and work with
marvinplugin using less options for running, minimize options we have currently
and can we remove few and work with them? and i believe
Tejas,
Check out the dev list I've just posted an issue with the system vms not
starting - you might be having the same issue. check the agent log for:
ERROR HypervResource.HypervResourceController
[6b05182a-efa1-4105-bc5c-0a49c55674f0] - com.cloud.agent.api.StartCommand fail
on
Hi,
This is my first attempt at building CloudStack from the source code and
decided on using DevCloud. I followed the wiki for using DevCloud
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/DevCloud.
I want to build the 4.3 release and used the updated DevCloud 2.0 appliance
and as per
tl;dr
i think your point 4 clarifies your change. remove --load and only run
tests unless --deploy is given. in the latter - do a deploy.
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:30:19AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
I believe we are deviating with too many notes here. Lets put things in
perspective.
I've had a quick look at the error statements - what version of Java is on the
devcloud vm?
Also, if you checkout the 4.3 branch, git pull then compile you should get the
4.3 current build.
Regards
Alex Hitchins
D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
+1 for pre- commit testing. Whichever tool enforces it would be good choice.
For feature check in, we ( community) require sanity tests to be submitted by
feature owners and this was followed well in 4.0 release but there is lapse in
this practice now. This would be a great if RM can enforce
What is the output of java -version .
Try after installing Java c 1.7 .It might resolve this issue.
Regards
Sadhu
-Original Message-
From: CK [mailto:cloudw...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 February 2014 17:11
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Source build failing in DevCloud
Hi,
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for providing API.
I have successfully attached primary storage to cloudstack.
I am facing problem with SSVM and CPVM also, probably I will initiate new
mail-trail ssytem vm issues.
Reards,
Tejas
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rajesh Battala
Java version is: javac 1.6.0_24
I'm new to 'git', how do I ...checkout the 4.3 branch, git pull then
compile you should get the 4.3 current build., can you provide the
commands?
Thanks
On 7 February 2014 12:00, Alex Hitchins alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com wrote:
I've had a quick look at the
Hi Paul,
Looks like you are using untagged vlan in your setup. There was a bug in agent
code with respect to that. Rajesh made a fix for it in commit-id
7df148c762510f669b60edff9d8d690c800b1f95 few days back. This fix should address
the problem.
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
I haven't used devcloud in a while - this link might prove useful to you.
http://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html
After the clone is complete, you can git checkout 4.3 then git pull to
ensure it's updated. The link gives you the steps to get your first commit done.
Welcome to the group!
Also, I think that Java version might be old - where did you get the devcloud
image from?
Regards
Alex Hitchins
D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: CK [mailto:cloudw...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 February 2014
LS,
I had a discussion on uniq paths and unit tests yesterday night with
our new colleague Miguel about the unit tests that we have in
Cloudstack at the moment. He pointed me to a common smell that I
overlooked so far in Cloudstack.
A lot of times unit tests are organised as folows:
class test{
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17843/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17844/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das.
Hi Paul,
I have just join dev-list. So didn't received your mail but I show your
mail in mail-archive. I think I am not using latest system templete iso.
I have downloaded system vm template from
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2
please suggest
Thanks Devdeep,
@Animesh, can we make sure the patch gets into the next RC please.
Many thanks
Paul.
Regards,
Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Devdeep Singh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17847/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5978
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33928
---
I would love to see pre-commit testing such as what Hugo described.
At the time being, I tend to mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install to
make sure I have a clean build and run whatever tests it runs, then I run
my own suite of tests manually (I'd like to automated these when I have
time), then
Hi guys,
is there a chance that someone looks at my bug report, to check if it does make
sense?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6060
I've also noticed that my older bug reports form half a year ago, have had no
status update. Is this normal and expected? Is it possible that
+1. Any UI changes?
On 2/6/14 5:11 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi,
Multiple ips per nic feature allows user to acquire more ip address on vm
nic.
On these ip addresses user able to configure PF and static NAT.
With this feature user can also configure the
Hi Koushik,
I agree with the idea of supporting multiple IDs. But I may not like the
idea of introducing another different query parameter ids for this
purpose. Why cannot we just change current id parameter to take a list
of values? This way, user will not need to use two different
Daan,
1) What is the reason you execute this code snippet just for Shared
networks?
2) As I suggested in my prev email, before retrieving Dhcpprovider, you
should check if dhcp service is enabled on the network. Use method
areServicesSupportedInNetwork
From NetworkModel to check that.
-Alena.
Just tested this today, it happens consistently in my setup.
Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6061 with
plenty of details.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
H Alena,
I am just trying to fix an old contribution that I applied as it
seemed not to harm in a basic test. revert didn't work so I am looking
for a quick remedy. The original patch does it for shared only. I
don't care either way. Lets do the best thing.
the code now
if (vm.getType()
+1 It's confusing to have id and ids all over the place. We should just say
all ids can come in arrays by default.
--Alex
-Original Message-
From: Min Chen [mailto:min.c...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 9:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]
Hi Suresh,
If you struggle to make progress, you could take a look at
https://github.com/snowch/devcloud
I'm hoping that this environment will be a replacement for devcloud2.
It also checks out 4.3 and builds it.
Please report any bugs on the github issue tracker.
Many thanks,
Chris
On
Daan,
Here is how it should look:
//1) Make all the checks that used to exist in original code + if DHCP
service is enabled on the network
if (vm.getType() == Type.User network.getTrafficType() ==
TrafficType.Guest isLastNicInSubnet(nic) network.getGuestType() ==
GuestType.Shared
Yes, agree to this as well.
Accordingly we need to handle the getEntityOwnerId() dependency.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 10:06 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] List VM API enhancement
+1 It's
Alena do you mind checking into this issue?
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 10:00 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: DB upgrade 4.2.1 - 4.3 fails
Just tested this today, it happens consistently in my setup.
Updated the bug. Most likely happened because the upgrade was performed
twice (failed the first time, and the person doing the upgrade,didn¹t do
the rollback). See more details in the bug.
-Alena.
On 2/7/14, 10:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Alena do you mind
Nux you had a similar issue for previous RC
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5902 which was resolved as not
a problem
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 10:49 AM
To:
Good point Min.
I also thought about it but looking at some of the existing APIs thought of
keeping both.
For e.g. in deploy VM api there is a parameter called 'networkids' which can
take an array of network IDs. Note that the naming convention of ending in 's'.
Now by this logic we should
We can just agree from now on to use the ³id for handling multiple ids.
And of course, we can never delete the ³ID² parameter just to satisfy the
old convention, as this is the most used parameter :)
I can see that several existing commands - archive/deleteAlerts are using
ApiConstants.IDs
+1 for pre-commit testing.
I put pre-commit testing in practice personally, and it helped me a lot.
Before I submit a patch, I create a pull request in my github repo. My
Jenkins subscribes pull requests by Jenkins plugin for Github and the
build result is displayed in Github.
I heard there are
I looked at BaseListCmd.java and see the following.
Prachi, Are you referring to this or anything else?
public long getEntityOwnerId() {
// no owner is needed for list command
return 0;
}
On 08-Feb-2014, at 12:02 AM, Prachi Damle
On 07.02.2014 19:01, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Nux you had a similar issue for previous RC
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5902 which was
resolved as not a problem
I know, but this time it's persistent.
I think it may be related to the installation of the new system
template.
+1. Looks fine to me.
I think there are should be some UI changes, allow to choose multiple IPs
if VM has more than one IP in this network.
--Sheng
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
+1. Any UI changes?
On 2/6/14 5:11 AM, Jayapal Reddy
sure, will try to find a spot asap. and write unit tests to simulate
those two situations.
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
Here is how it should look:
//1) Make all the checks that used to exist in original code + if DHCP
service
Hey Daan,
I guess you are talking about your fix submitted in master [1].
You might want to see Hari's latest patch [2] as well. It solves the
following two things which I guess your fix misses.
1. It sets the vcpu max to a hardcoded value (say 16) only when dynamic
scaling is enabled. Do note
On 07.02.2014 19:47, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Did you review Alena's response?
Of course, check the issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6061
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Alena can you review the comment from Nux in bug
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:52 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: DB upgrade 4.2.1 - 4.3 fails
On 07.02.2014 19:47, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Did you review
Can I have the patch applied in 4.3-forward?
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Harikrishna Patnala; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
Did you review Alena's response?
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:28 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: DB upgrade 4.2.1 - 4.3 fails
On 07.02.2014 19:01, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Nux you had a similar issue for
Thanks, everyone!
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Santhosh Edukulla
santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Mike!!
Santhosh
From: Ahmad Emneina [aemne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 10:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 11:33 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Harikrishna Patnala; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
instances are created on XenServer with a
On Feb. 7, 2014, 3:57 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
plugins/hypervisors/xen/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/XenServerGuru.java, line 70
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/diff/2/?file=480018#file480018line70
Will the upgrade path get this config ??
Yes Nitin, after upgrade or fresh 4.3 setup
See my reply to the bug. The new system vm template should be registered
through CS API registerTemplate (and named like Install Guide requests),
not by running template install script.
Thanks!
Alena.
On 2/7/14, 11:51 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 07.02.2014 19:47, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33959
---
Commit 95e41fdf0da50c165a9317847058fce4efeddbcf in branch
Animesh - done. Please cherry pick to 4.3
Daan - for pushing this to master I will have to revert your fix in master.
On 07/02/14 11:48 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Can I have the patch applied in 4.3-forward?
-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta
I have pulled it into next RC but for each fix going in 4.3-forward I want to
see a matching bugId.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 5:26 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Rajesh Battala; Animesh Chaturvedi
Here is the commit id on 4.3-forward
commit 95e41fdf0da50c165a9317847058fce4efeddbcf
-Harikrishna
From: Nitin Mehta
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 2:46 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Harikrishna Patnala; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: Review Request
Done applied to 4.3
-Original Message-
From: Harikrishna Patnala
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 1:31 PM
To: Nitin Mehta; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Anthony Xu; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: RE: Review Request 17747: CLOUDSTACK-6023:Non windows
instances are created on XenServer
On 07.02.2014 20:55, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
See my reply to the bug. The new system vm template should be
registered
through CS API registerTemplate (and named like Install Guide
requests),
not by running template install script.
I have corrected that, but the upgrade still fails. Issue
Nux,
During the rollback, you just applied 4.2.1 db dump. That doesn¹t drop the
tables that were inserted by partial 4.2.14.3 upgrade. Refer to my last
comment to the bug for the rollback steps.
Thanks,
Alena.
On 2/7/14, 1:36 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 07.02.2014 20:55, Alena
Hi,
A quick update on the move to .rst format.
We now have four repos for the docs:
git://git.apache.org/cloudstack-docs-rn.git
git://git.apache.org/cloudstack-docs-admin.git
git://git.apache.org/cloudstack-docs-install.git
git://git.apache.org/cloudstack-docs.git
All four are mirrored on
On 07.02.2014 21:50, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Nux,
During the rollback, you just applied 4.2.1 db dump. That doesn¹t drop
the
tables that were inserted by partial 4.2.14.3 upgrade. Refer to my
last
comment to the bug for the rollback steps.
Yes, that was it!
On to more testing now,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17233/#review33968
---
Commit c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44 in branch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17747/#review33967
---
Commit 01289b1647db2b08d42c883452aae6ca7dda in branch
Yes.
-min
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Alena Prokharchyk
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com wrote:
We can just agree from now on to use the ³id for handling multiple ids.
And of course, we can never delete the ³ID² parameter just to satisfy the
old convention, as this is
There is no good answer IMHO. The designer of the API chose this design.
Throwing a checked exception or returning Null is equivalent.
Throwing a runtime exception is probably wrong since there may be some
recovery possible.
We could annotate the method with @Nullable so that the compiler/IDE
Ok so I am ready to roll with an RC. Thanks Nux, Alena
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:09 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: DB upgrade 4.2.1 - 4.3 fails
On 07.02.2014 21:50, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Nux,
Cool
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DOCS] update on move to rst
Hi,
A quick update on the move to .rst format.
We now have four repos for the docs:
Visually so much nicer!
On 2/7/14 2:58 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com
wrote:
Cool
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:02 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [DOCS] update on move to rst
+1.
* The guideline is not clear as to when a developer should use this
executor. Why not use it all the time (even for a single command)
* Are there any issues when there are multiple management servers involved?
* Any threading concerns? That is, multiple threads are attempting to
update the
Phew. Thanks for the tldr
On 2/7/14 3:53 AM, Prasanna Santhanam t...@apache.org wrote:
tl;dr
i think your point 4 clarifies your change. remove --load and only run
tests unless --deploy is given. in the latter - do a deploy.
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:30:19AM +, Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Hi,
I used to work with gerrit in OS projects and I think the tool is great,
the integration with jenkins is cool.
One problem could be when jenkins infrastructure problems are frequent and
developers start to ignore warnings from jenkins.
With my particular project we were also frequently hit by
Thanks for the comment!
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com wrote:
+1.
* The guideline is not clear as to when a developer should use this
executor. Why not use it all the time (even for a single command)
The mechanism behind is NOT a
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: c1af92fcbbc183873d6519f0660b68acfb33bd44
List of changes:
Release notes are still in
I occasionally have some minor improvement that I need to make to
whatever version of cloudstack we're currently running. This is almost
always behind what is currently being developed, and I don't always
feel like I have time to rebase/refactor it for master. I'm wondering
if there are any
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
