Ok that's good start with a +1
Thanks
Animesh
On Feb 7, 2014, at 11:13 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM
Thanks Rohit !
On 08/02/14 11:27 am, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Abhi and anyone else who wants to renew their license, email
opensou...@jetbrains.com with your old license as reference and
request them to renew the license using you @apache.org email.
Hope this helps,
Rohit Yadav
On Feb 7, 2014, at 6:26 PM, Chiradeep Vittal chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
wrote:
Phew. Thanks for the tldr
Yes thanks, this was difficult to follow.
Definitely we want a deploy mechanism as simple as possible. I do have to say
that running 'nose' to just setup the configuration feels a bit
On 08.02.2014 07:12, Marcus wrote:
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
Marcus, aren't you seeing the OVM issue with CLVM, too?
On 08.02.2014 10:00, Nux! wrote:
On 08.02.2014 07:12, Marcus wrote:
+1 (binding)
Built RPMs on CentOS 6.5, deployed advanced zone, vpc, network,
installed template, launched VM on local storage, launched VM on NFS
storage, launched VM on CLVM storage.
Marcus, aren't you seeing the OVM issue
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
+1 from me, upgrade from 4.2.1 works fine. Tested with CentOS, KVM,
NFS, CLVM, Adv+SG.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Sheng,
Use the templates build from master (after build 77) from
jenkins.buildacloud.org. Those templates have java 7.
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm-master/
Cheers,
Hugo
On 8 feb. 2014, at 02:10, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
BTW, the error result in SSVM and CPVM
On 20.01.2014 23:11, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
So, is this GUI field going to be in 4.3, but not functional? If so,
that
seems a little strange. Perhaps it should be removed.
BTW, guys, this thing still shows up in the UI. Should be removed,
creates confusion and false hope. :-)
--
Sent from
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17703/#review34013
---
test_custom_compute_offering.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17789/#review34015
---
tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/common.py
Alena,
I added unit tests and made a review request for you,
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17872/
I have a question though. I can see some small the semantic differnce
between the following two snippits but is only in the evaluation order
of the conditions under which to execute, not in the
Hi,
At some point during my migration from 4.2.1 to 4.3 I started getting
these on the Cloudstack KVM HV:
Failed to get rule logs, better luck next time!
It happens when this is run:
/usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/network/security_group.py
get_rule_logs_for_vms
Can someone help me
While working on devcloud2, I've been thinking about whether devcloud2
could be taken a step further.
It is possible to fully automate setup of a cloudstack development
environment, consisting of:
- debian with lightweight desktop (LXDE and RDP)
- git clone of cloudstack
- mvn build of latest
Hi there guys,
I have been trying to do a smoke test on the 4.3.0 fourth round RC for few
hours already unsuccessfully. I followed the release test procedures wiki and
all the checks and builds worked fine. However, when it comes to start the
management server, I get errors about creating bean
I plan to test out a bunch of storage use cases on Monday afternoon when I
have time, so I can chime in at that point.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 08.02.2014 00:51, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following
Hello,
I'm attempting to utilize a public IP subnet and a private subnet.
However, getting this error:
is not compatible with the CIDR of pod: Hades and zone: Argos
at
com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.checkCIDR(ResourceManagerImpl.java:1508)
at
Hi Guys,
Any idea what's happening here? (see last two lines of log).
I haven't seeded sec storage, because it's going to be S3 based.
Unless you have to create NFS first and then migrate to it? But then the option
to 'not create nfs staging area' doesn't make sense...
2014-02-08 20:11:16,770
This is just a test, I recently change my e-mail address. Making sure I
am able to receive from both distro lists.
- Mo
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/473/
--
Started by user anonymous
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder in workspace
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/472/
--
[...truncated 93 lines...]
remote: Compressing objects: 70% (288/411) [K
remote: Compressing objects: 71% (292/411) [K
remote: Compressing objects: 72% (296/411) [K
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/474/
--
Started by user anonymous
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on rpmbuilder in workspace
It does seem like a usability problem waiting to happen (having that field
in there, but it doesn't actually work in 4.3).
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 20.01.2014 23:11, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
So, is this GUI field going to be in 4.3, but not functional? If
Man. Wishing I was living near there.
Good bug bashing guys!
On Feb 8, 2014, at 3:46 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
We are going to have a week of close quarter code bashing starting
this monday. We will have a focus on reducing findbugs hits and
increasing unit
23 matches
Mail list logo
