---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21628/
---
(Updated May 29, 2014, 6:13 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked Saksham Srivastava to become a committer and we are pleased to announce
that he has accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and
Dear guys
I found a bug about listUsageRecords API in 4.3 related to a issue
CLOUDSTACK-6472 and made a patch. Would you review the patch and
correct me if I am wrong?
Sam Schmit push a commit about NPEs/Null UUIDs at May 5th but I think
his commit is not enough.
commit
On May 29, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Hiroki Ohashi hiroki.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear guys
I found a bug about listUsageRecords API in 4.3 related to a issue
CLOUDSTACK-6472 and made a patch. Would you review the patch and
correct me if I am wrong?
Sam Schmit push a commit about NPEs/Null UUIDs
Congrats Saksham
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Saksham
Srivastava
Congrats Saksham!!
-Original Message-
From: Anshul Gangwar [mailto:anshul.gang...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 May 2014 13:32
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
Congrats Saksham
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Hearty Congrats Saksham!
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Will try, thx. Not sure good question - when is 4.4 scheduled to be
releases - few months, or more ?
Thanks
On 29 May 2014 06:15, Jayapal Reddy Uradi jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.comwrote:
Hi Andrija,
Same issue with public vlan tagged got fixed, CLOUDSTACK-5505.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On
Andrija, we plan to release it soon. It depends on how quickly issues
in it are fixed. The branch has been created, so you could test it and
report on it if you have an env to spare.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
Will try, thx. Not sure good
Many many congratulations Saksham!
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Daan, thanks for info. And one final question - is it possible to change
Public vlan/range from untagged to tagged - editing vlan table and
making change, does not really make changes after I restart VPC router...
THanks
On 29 May 2014 10:15, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations Saksham !! :)
-Original Message-
From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:likitha.she...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
Many many congratulations Saksham!
-Original
sebgoa
2014-05-29 16:52 GMT+09:00 sebgoa run...@gmail.com:
On May 29, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Hiroki Ohashi hiroki.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear guys
I found a bug about listUsageRecords API in 4.3 related to a issue
CLOUDSTACK-6472 and made a patch. Would you review the patch and
correct me if I
Well, on the same eth1 device I have both untagged packets and tagged one
(vlan 500) having reall access to public IPs/network.
So I would need to replace untagged with 500 somewhere inside
database...not sure where, that's the question :)
Thanks.
On 29 May 2014 10:53, Daan Hoogland
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
500
is 500 the vlan of your guestnetwork or your physical network? You
wouldn't want to have two nets with vlan 500!
--
Daan
The fix is already in 4.4
commit 3a3457e7132d22f52aa38179d40a6eb9b0b29677
Author: Sam Schmit sam.sch...@appcore.com
AuthorDate: Fri May 2 13:07:34 2014 -0500
Commit: Daan Hoogland d...@onecht.net
CommitDate: Tue May 6 17:46:20 2014 +0200
CLOUDSTACK-6472 listUsageRecords: Pull
Congratulations Saksham..
~Rajani
On 29-May-2014, at 2:19 pm, Sailaja Mada sailaja.m...@citrix.com wrote:
Congratulations Saksham.
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 29 May 2014 12:18
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham
It's like this:
I have public subnet /24.
half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500) and the second half is
dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan tags, that is untagged packets)
Both vlan500 and untagged packets travel over physical eth1 interface on
hypervisors and can reach
On May 29, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
wrote:
The fix is already in 4.4
commit 3a3457e7132d22f52aa38179d40a6eb9b0b29677
Author: Sam Schmit sam.sch...@appcore.com
AuthorDate: Fri May 2 13:07:34 2014 -0500
Commit: Daan Hoogland d...@onecht.net
I don't think editing DB table will work.
-Jayapal
On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
It's like this:
I have public subnet /24.
half is dedicated for Guest traffic (vlan 500) and the second half is
dedicated to Public traffic/network (no vlan tags,
Hello CloudStack forum,
We are following the steps mentioned:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Create+config+management+recipes+to+install+CloudStack
https://github.com/runseb/simstack to bring up a cloudstack dev instance.
After running vagrant up and vagrant reload
Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or two physical nets
on the same interface (seems wrong).
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
I don't think editing DB table will work.
-Jayapal
On 29-May-2014, at 2:52 PM, Andrija Panic
Congratulations Saksham.
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Hi Daan, Rajani
I looked at a code of master and 4.4 branch. findById is used at line
3031 of master branch and line 3299 of 4.4 branch, so I think this
leads to an same problem.
The code snippets of master and 4.4 branch are below.
[master] server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java
On May 29, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Madan Ganesh V madangan...@me.com wrote:
Hello CloudStack forum,
We are following the steps mentioned:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Create+config+management+recipes+to+install+CloudStack
https://github.com/runseb/simstack to bring
They are 2 traffic types on 1 physical net (that is both tagged vlan 500,
and untagged packets travel over same KVM bridge, and over eth1 to outside
world)...
On 29 May 2014 12:04, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Are these two traffic types in one physical net? or two physical
Hi All,
I was trying to create a autoscalevmprofile with a sample data for a test
case. Can anyone help me to know is there anything I'm missing in the input
parameters ?
I get a nullpointer error is it due to the missing deployParams parameter ?
I'm running this test on simulator.
We still see Unknown parameters... huge number of logs in server log. May
be, we can make this as configurable or dump to some other log say misc log,
if mandatory params are not sent as per request, dump to the log and return,
if arg types and arguments as per validation are wrong, then
Wido,
It's something I'll look into over time however there are a few more
complexities to overcome with a basic zone. Once Advanced has been done
hopefully Basic will follow shortly behind.
Alex Hitchins | 07788 423 969 | 01892 523 587
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21628/#review44256
---
Commit cdf4047ce823edcdd73f9a1562abc9c27f473557 in cloudstack's
Congratulations Saksham..
Thanks,
Vaibhav
-Original Message-
From: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 May 2014 15:39
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
Congratulations Saksham.
--Sanjay
-Original
Hi,
Before I ran any kind of command I decided to dive a little deeper into
this issue.
So, I checked the systemvm.iso that is inside CS MS. and it turned out that
it has the jars for the CS agent 4.3.0.
However, I also checked the systemvm.iso that is in the xen hosts in
On May 8, 2014, 5:06 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/lib/common.py, line 1103
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/diff/2/?file=567838#file567838line1103
Please dont add asserts to lib functions, just check the output in test
code and take it accordingly.
Assert
grep -v is your friend (or grep -ev even)
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Santhosh Edukulla
santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com wrote:
We still see Unknown parameters... huge number of logs in server log. May
be, we can make this as configurable or dump to some other log say misc log,
if
Megha,
in my current 4.4 line 411 of DeployVMCmd reads
if (accountId == null) {
hence it doesn't refer a pointer at that line.
which version are you using to get this:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22019/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
Bugs:
Hi,
Looks like the attachment was stripped. So, please find the proposal below:
*Introduction:*
We are planning to develop NuageVsp networking plugin that will
bring Nuage VSP network virtualization technology to CloudStack.
*Feature Summary:*
For the Nuage VSP Plugin,
Congrats Saksham.
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
Congratulations Saksham.
-Original Message-
Good job!
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Rayees Namathponnan
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Saksham.
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 1:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
GitHub user swill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/14
updated formatting to be consistent with the rest of the docs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
CloudStack supports 'cloud' workloads and 'enterprise' workloads as has been
highlighted numerous times recently in e-mails comparing CloudStack to
OpenStack.
Yes 'cloudy' workloads should not need this, but enterprise workloads most
definitely do.
This is something which regularly comes up
UPDATE:
I finally cracked it.
Even though the systemvm.iso files were updated into the xen servers, there
was a .vhd file that is created into the local storage of the servers that
are running the system VMs that contains the systemvm.iso files.
Therefore, I had to stop the CS MSs delete those
H Hiroki,
those calls are for ServiceOfferingVO not for VMInstanceVO. So they
are not the same issue but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't those
the be counted when deleted either.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Hiroki Ohashi hiroki.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daan, Rajani
I looked at a
Hi,
Can you please review the proposal and let me know if I need to add anything
else here?
Thanks Regards,
Ritu S.
-Original Message-
From: Ritu Sabharwal [mailto:rsabh...@brocade.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:34 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Brocade
welcome Saksham, go get
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Good job!
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Rayees Namathponnan
rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Saksham.
Regards,
Rayees
-Original Message-
From: Sailaja Mada
Antonio - Can you please remove this worker ? I had filed a bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6658 for the same
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 29/05/14 5:06 AM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
We still see Unknown parameters... huge number of logs in server log.
May
If removing the worker means that unknown parameters are never logged
i am -1 removing it.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
Antonio - Can you please remove this worker ? I had filed a bug
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6658 for the
Hi Daan,
We are tracking to deliver our plugin (Brocade Network plugin for VDX switches)
as per earlier communication of feature freeze for 4.5 release on mid-August.
Based on your proposal for moving in the code freeze to mid-June is too early
for us to provide the support for this release. I
Good reason, and I would certainly retract my proposal if it wouldn't
mean that a lot of new features will come in last minute. You won't
have to be done earlier.
So let me amend my proposal
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Ritu Sabharwal rsabh...@brocade.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
We are tracking
Seeing what objections there might be I want to amend my proposal to
1. move forward feature freeze not on the coming but on the next release.
2. set feature proposal dealine for the coming release on 19th of June
flames? other thoughts?
Daan
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Ritu Sabharwal
Hi Daan,
Read your amended proposal. Just to clarify, does it mean the feature proposal
deadline is 19th June and the feature code complete, testing and merging to
master branch is mid-August?
Thanks Regards,
Ritu S.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Perhaps we need to review/replace the release plan as a whole, find
something that will get us on track and keep us on track.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Seeing what objections there might be I want to amend my proposal to
1. move forward
Congrats Saksham :)
On 28/05/14 11:47 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked Saksham Srivastava to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce
that he has accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute
feature should be done (in it's branch) by 19th july. merging and
fixing issues may take to mid august.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Ritu Sabharwal rsabh...@brocade.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
Read your amended proposal. Just to clarify, does it mean the feature
proposal deadline is 19th June
That is what I want with this thread, yes. Please counter propose or
amend as you like.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:11 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps we need to review/replace the release plan as a whole, find
something that will get us on track and keep us on track.
On Thu, May
In an effort to help keep our releases from getting out of hand, I think we
should consider moving the Feature Proposal deadline up, as well.
My main concern is that many people have three CloudStack-related threads
executing right now, though:
1) People are still testing 4.4.
2) People are
Hi Daan,
Can you please cherry-pick 63090434b1cb4e7b87f0e024fbbc644faee863f7 to 4.4,
system template always create with name master instead of current git branch
Regards,
Rayees
Congrats Saksham
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Saksham
Hi,
I wanted to know if there are any license to be signed by individuals or
corporates to contribute to CloudStack.
Thanks Regards,
Ritu S.
Ritu,
Many companies donate their code to apache cloudstack. There is no
license to sign, however there is Intellectual Property Clearance
process you need to go through. From what i recall, you describe what it
is you would like to donate, we put it to a vote and once approved the
code is
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Ritu Sabharwal rsabh...@brocade.com wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to know if there are any license to be signed by individuals or
corporates to contribute to CloudStack.
Thanks Regards,
Ritu S.
So, it depends.
If you or your company is donating a significant
Congrats Saksham !!
-Original Message-
From: Vaibhav Gupta [mailto:vaibhav.gu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:03 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
Congratulations Saksham..
Thanks,
Vaibhav
-Original Message-
Congrats Saksham!
Regards,
Gaurav
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu
sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com wrote:
Congrats Saksham !!
-Original Message-
From: Vaibhav Gupta [mailto:vaibhav.gu...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 6:03 PM
To:
Thanks Sebastien for the clarification.
Cheers,
Madan
On 29 May 2014 at 3:42:55 pm, sebgoa (run...@gmail.com) wrote:
On May 29, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Madan Ganesh V madangan...@me.com wrote:
Hello CloudStack forum,
We are following the steps mentioned:
Thanks everyone !!
Regards,
Saksham
-Original Message-
From: Gaurav Aradhye [mailto:gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:35 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
Congrats Saksham!
Regards,
Gaurav
On Fri, May 30,
Hi Daan,
I'm testing on 4.4-forward-iam branch.
Thanks
Meghna.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Megha,
in my current 4.4 line 411 of DeployVMCmd reads
if (accountId == null) {
hence it doesn't refer a pointer at that line.
which
67 matches
Mail list logo
