I know some of them are not, but a lot may be. We all need to have a
look at that. I will, but the total number is over 350! (including
those not marked as critical.)
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com wrote:
84 is a bug number to call RC ready
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Amogh Vasekar
amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote:
de04881da177b28d7cb3efc09adb2d8069f0fdd3
is in
--
Daan
Ilja, Mike, Yes at least one I am afraid. I hope we can have as little
as possible but I will keep calling them untill we have a 4.4 out.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
It sounds like there will be at least one more next Monday at the same
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 6:34 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su,
On June 16, 2014, 6:04 a.m., Koushik Das wrote:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/XenServerStorageProcessor.java,
line 296
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22510/diff/1/?file=608108#file608108line296
Will data.getPath() return a path with
Hi Daan,
Please cherry pick the following commit to 4.4
commit 2214bd2502a34ee8e671eb6b4efe8cd26e29ac5a
CLOUDSTACK-6922: Updated events for firewall ingress and egress
Thanks,
Jayapal
Morning Boys and Girls,
There is one week left to submit your papers for CCC Budapest Nov 19-21:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe/program/cfp
Come share your CloudStack stories,
Cheers,
-Sebastien
On Jun 16, 2014, at 4:34 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
http://planet.apache.org/cloudstack
added to website on About section
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:24 AM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
The website points to our blog at:
https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/
I am pretty
Can i submit a tentative proposal?
If stars align (as they seem to align so far), I will try to present @
CCC Budapest.
On 6/16/14, 11:51 PM, sebgoa wrote:
Morning Boys and Girls,
There is one week left to submit your papers for CCC Budapest Nov 19-21:
On Jun 17, 2014, at 9:48 AM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Can i submit a tentative proposal?
yes
If stars align (as they seem to align so far), I will try to present @ CCC
Budapest.
On 6/16/14, 11:51 PM, sebgoa wrote:
Morning Boys and Girls,
There is one week
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 1:35 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, amit kumar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22672/#review45919
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On June 17, 2014, 5:01
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22672/#review45920
---
Commit 7c15f148daf9ebb28a8945296db6a967fcfb19f7 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22674/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-1466
Is there any change in the coverity scan project settings??
the dashboard says Last Analyzed on Jun 09, 2014
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/943?tab=overview
while jenkins job is successful
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-master-twiceweekly-coverity/lastBuild/
~Rajani
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 2:58 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, amit kumar
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 9:37 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
On June 16, 2014, 9 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote:
I was curious about the resizing of the VDI to take up all of the space of
the SR.
This is actually what I initially did in 4.2; however, it later dawned on
me that - if you want to take hypervisor snapshots - then you need to have
On June 12, 2014, 1:11 p.m., Rajesh Battala wrote:
systemvm/patches/debian/config/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config, line 33
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21771/diff/1/?file=586596#file586596line33
This daemon will be installed in the base image itself.
Hi Rajesh, I don't know what you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/#review45925
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Girish Shilamkar
On June 6, 2014, 9:40
Hi,
Xen Project (previously xen.org xenserver) is widely accessible in several
Linux distributions such as Arch, Fedora etc. Therefore, people may want to
use it instead of XenServer (6.2 or later). The ACS 4.5 design doc [1]
explains about XenServer and how it should be tested etc. but what
Hi Daan,
Please cherry pick the following commit into 4.4
commit b0d726a872e2859a56ee677c15079cc3a59ab894
CLOUDSTACK-6923: updated listLBStickinessPolicies API to list using stickiness
policy id
Thanks,
Jayapal
Rohit,
We've only supported xapi so far, so I'm curious if you had Xen Project 4.4
working before with xapi and if that is now broken. Nothing I did should
have impacted that, but it wasn't in my test suite so anything is possible
On Jun 17, 2014 11:21 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22677/
---
Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland.
Repository: cloudstack-git
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
2214bd2502a34ee8e671eb6b4efe8cd26e29ac5a
I had conflicts. Can you have a look near line 550? I resolved by
changing IpAddress to PublicIpAddress.
regards
--
Daan
Resolved the conflicts for the mentioned commit.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22677/
Santhosh
From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 12:09 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ACS44] Cherry Pick Request
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:28
Tim,
Thanks for replying, let me clean up everything and re-setup my test infra
after my $dayjob hours and get back to you. The test cases in the design
doc does not discuss Xen Project so I thought I should ask if ACS works
with Xen Project 4.x.
The Xen/XenProject/XenServer/XAPI/XCP is
On June 16, 2014, 9:28 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java,
line 1963
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22631/diff/1/?file=610681#file610681line1963
It looks like in VolumeOrchestrator that the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22679/
---
Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6922
Hi Daan,
Resolved the conflicts and uploaded patch in review board.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22679/
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 17-Jun-2014, at 4:52 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45927
---
Commit 883d8f11196e9ca55324bcf075880e077a2d3df3 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45928
---
Ship it!
883d8f11196e9ca55324bcf075880e077a2d3df3 in 4.4-forward
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45929
---
Commit 591148c4641fd079d7b9b85d30e0c297212984e1 in cloudstack's
On June 17, 2014, 11:42 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote:
883d8f11196e9ca55324bcf075880e077a2d3df3 in 4.4-forward
591148c4641fd079d7b9b85d30e0c297212984e1 on master
- daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19779/#review45931
---
Commit 5cc5483a7895e7876e336349323a5ea5598d5137 in cloudstack's
applied and pushed,
I have one remark; when fixing issues I would like to see a ref to the
issue (in this case no jira issue but 'coverity:') and a description
of what was solved. your style of commit comments requires a lot of
contextual knowledge. Can you try to make sure someone reading your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22677/#review45932
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On June 17, 2014, 11:15
On June 17, 2014, 12:05 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
Ship It!
CommitId: 61cf175f1c2a45f237d20ab7b729876c072f9e89
- Santhosh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Sure.
From: Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 7:55 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ACS44] Cherry Pick Request
applied and pushed,
I have one remark; when fixing issues I would like to see a ref to the
issue (in this case no
I don't think I was clear. I don't need a new patch. I did resolve the
conflict. I need you to check if I did the right thing in branch 4.4
in EventTypes near line 550
your new patch doesn't apply to 4.4 or 4.4-forward
git am -s
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Murali Reddy murali.re...@citrix.com wrote:
8ca8a7217ec155a37b24e3d9cfc3d5fc67adef2d
is in
--
Daan
Daan, please cherry-pick below commit in 4.4-forward into 4.4
commit 8ca8a7217ec155a37b24e3d9cfc3d5fc67adef2d
CLOUDSTACK-6925: [OVS] get rid custom logic to create bridges on hosts
in the XenServer pool for GRE tunnel networks
Fix uses XenServer recommended way
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/536/changes
On Jun 13, 2014, at 2:55 AM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastian,
Please cherry-pick following commits:
Cherry-picked the next three.
keep them coming
CLOUDSTACK-5891.[VMware] If a template has been registered and
cpu.corespersocket...
Hi,
Can you guys confirm this will make it into 4.3? Fixes an ipset related bug.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6240
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com
To:
As well, there are two defect densities displayed at links below. Is the first
one, an overall\all projects density metric, and other for individual
cloudstack project ?
https://scan.coverity.com/dashboard
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/943?tab=overview
Regards,
Santhosh
On Jun 17, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
Can you guys confirm this will make it into 4.3? Fixes an ipset related bug.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6240
yes, I confirm:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.3
Lucian
--
Sent from the
Wunderbar, thanks!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 17 June, 2014 3:43:45 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 4.3.1
On Jun 17, 2014, at 4:04 PM, Nux!
In my simple mind it seems we only need to create a
Upgrade430to431.java file and don't need any sql files. Is this going
to fly? AFAICT the only thing to go in there is the vlan fixup in the
vlan table, which is a data migration and not a schema change.
Can anyone point out to me the error in my
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing this issue when trying to build the codebase under
either 4.4 or master?
Thanks!
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process
(default) on project cloud-client-ui: Error resolving project artifact:
Could not transfer
On June 16, 2014, 3:30 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote:
I was curious about the resizing of the VDI to take up all of the space of
the SR.
This is actually what I initially did in 4.2; however, it later dawned on
me that - if you want to take hypervisor snapshots - then you need to have
Mike,
This seems like an issue with repository.apache.org.
Might be a job for infra?
On 17 June 2014 16:48, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing this issue when trying to build the codebase under
either 4.4 or master?
Thanks!
[ERROR] Failed to
This failed twice this morning, but seems to be OK for me now.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else seeing this issue when trying to build the codebase under
either 4.4 or master?
Thanks!
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/net/juniper/contrail/juniper-contrail-api/1.0-SNAPSHOT/juniper-contrail-api-1.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
returns a 404.
Searching on apache's nexus also returns nothing for juniper or contrail
https://repository.apache.org/index.html
I'd imagine you are working from
This morning, when I ran that URL, it returned that the service was
unavailable (which is consistent with what Maven said).
Now, as you pointed out, it returns a 404.
It all seems to work now, but before it was failing on both my Mac OS X and
Ubuntu environments.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:31
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/#review45955
---
One more comment regarding spring-server-core-managers-context.xml.
Congrats Amogh.
(too late though!)
-Original Message-
From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 11:14 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Amogh Vasekar as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
I am too late to wish you on ML. Congrats
Welcome aboard, and don't forget to drive the BLR Meetup group..:-)
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 11:48 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Rohit Yadav bhais...@apache.org wrote:
Tim,
Thanks for replying, let me clean up everything and re-setup my test infra
after my $dayjob hours and get back to you. The test cases in the design
doc does not discuss Xen Project so I thought I should ask if ACS
Kept failing for me yesterday too.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 6/17/14 9:44 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
This morning, when I ran that URL, it returned that the service was
unavailable (which is consistent with what Maven said).
Now, as you pointed out, it returns a 404.
It all
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sanjeev n,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 7:14 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22692/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 7:24 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22693/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sangeetha
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar, Raja Pullela, sangeetha
Hi,
ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter seems weird for me.
ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator and ClusterScopeStoragePoolAllocator are
allocator classes to select storage pool.
They extends AbstractStoragePoolAllocator class, which provides
filter method to exclude unavailable storage pools.
Why
Why ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator implements filter method (and doesn't call
that of base class) rather than just using that of base class?
ZoneWideStoragePoolAllocator#filter method seems doesn't care avoid
parameter, doesn't skip iSCSI type storage pool even if a volume is a RootDisk.
The
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 8:51 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 8:53 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22695/
---
(Updated June 17, 2014, 9 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Hi All,
This week the project was tested by Sebastien, Rohit and Leo. All
successfully got a cloud up which is good news.
I've separated the project out a bit and the documentation has been updated
thanks to Rohit and suggestions from Leo.
The main repository can be found at:
Chiradeep,
So i did a little more digging in your example, I also realized you code
has assumption that i have /24 entirely dedicated to CloudStack :)
Welcome to enterprise madness where IP space, while being internal and
free - is close guarded and restricted.
Do we have a concept of IP
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22705/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22706/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22706/
---
(Updated June 18, 2014, 1:06 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22707/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22707/
---
(Updated June 18, 2014, 1:16 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen,
I can comment on the IOPS part.
The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is
currently only applicable at the zone level). That being the case, no
cluster (or local) storage takes advantage of counting IOPS that have been
handed out.
Of course this logic might be
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22709/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22712/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22713/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Min Chen, Prachi Damle, and Santhosh Edukulla.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22627/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6906
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22614/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6887
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/
---
(Updated June 18, 2014, 8:53 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Hi all,
I've sent this mail to the users list but this one looks as the better
destination.
I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform does need
the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly,
Can anyone elaborate on this?
Are there any proposals for adding ESXi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/
---
(Updated June 18, 2014, 9:36 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Girish
Instructions for how to unsubscribe:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, abhisek basu abhisekb...@msn.com wrote:
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the
4.3.1 - 4.4.0 upgrade also needs to be handled.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 June 2014 9:16 PM
To: dev
Subject: [ACS431][QUESTION] db upgrace
In my simple mind it seems we only need to create a Upgrade430to431.java file
and
Thanks again :)
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:43 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
I am too late to wish you on ML. Congrats
Welcome aboard,
Hi Daan,
The conflicts resolved looks fine.
You can ignore my patch.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 17-Jun-2014, at 5:50 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think I was clear. I don't need a new patch. I did resolve the
conflict. I need you to check if I did the right thing in
Congrats Saksham !!
-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:18 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Saksham Srivastava as committer
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Saksham
Anthony,
Thanks for response
While i see your point, i believe its a corner case. Consider this scenario:
I have a network 192.168.1.2 - 10 assigned as management network
I have a network 192.168.1.11 - 200 assigned to guests.
The router VM will get two IPs in this case 192.168.1.2 and
GitHub user karuturi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/15
corrected the java version to 1.7
changed java package and JAVA_HOME to 1.7
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Not sure I understand. Would this be a single network encompassing several
vlans and ip ranges?
From: ilya musayev
ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.commailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Or is it that the client doesn’t care about the network (since all networks are
reachable from one-another) and just wants to run a VM.
This is called a basic zone :)
Some higher level portal could achieve this logic for an advanced zone, I guess.
From: Chiradeep Vittal
96 matches
Mail list logo
