OK, so, I did a couple things:
1) I documented the code in the resize-volume area (there were two places
that I saw) where we bit shift to convert from GB to bytes.
2) I created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7101
The ticket will probably have to wait until a major release
Oh, by the way, that code documentation is still in my sandbox (i.e. not
committed). I am working on updating the resize-volume logic for 4.5.
Hopefully I'll have it checked in sometime next week.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
OK, so, I
What if several features of the standard CloudStack GUI (user login) are not to
be shown to the user?
Looking for a simple portal which allows end users to login, select a vm,
spinoff that vm with its apps and data, and which allows end user logout.
What about just using the standard
Well, one of the GUI people might be able to answer this better, but I was
under the impression each tab on the left-hand side of the GUI is a
separate GUI plug-in and, as such, can be configured to be in or out of
the GUI fairly easily (kind of like how it works if you log in as an admin
and see
I didn't put this in the ticket, but - historically - when one talks about
1 GB in the persistent-storage world, one means 1,000,000,000 bytes (as
opposed to memory, where 1 GB means 1,073,741,824 bytes).
Some systems try to clarify this by using, for example, GB versus GiB.
On Sat, Jul 12,
-0 What does it fix and is the solution bonifide. We should fix the
test suite if it is. The test suite not working is not enough reason
to revert a commit, it should block the test-suite because the system
is broken, not because of the way the test suite works.
Disclaimer: I do not know enough
Hello,
CentOS 7 has recently been announced, I built a template that can be used with
CloudStack.
I'd appreciate any sort of feedback as I could only test the KVM images:
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/centos/vanilla/7/x86_64/
I have also updated the CentOS 6 ones, for those who need them:
And I agree it was probably an oversight by the original storage devs,
using powers of 2 instead of 10, since physical hardware doesn't work that
way, but its a bit too late to change now. Its just looks a tad generous I
guess.
On Jul 12, 2014 8:22 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I just
Hi,
I'm doing a code review and had a question that I thought someone might be
able to answer for me:
Do we typically allow vendor-specific config values in Global Settings?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o:
