count me jclouds integration for more recent API features
Regards
Priyanka
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Jul 23, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Aled Sage aled.s...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
We are keen users of and contributors to jclouds [1],
4.4.1:)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Daan,
The commits are
e9c81c78b9ded178c983b8a50650641fb0f8ac0e
c1c2be423099c786ccfabf960c25f651f4e19928
I didn't put it into 4.4 because I thought it would be too big a risk but
it's been in master for 3
Mike, Rajani,
Sebastien's point was that the current 4.4 is the closest we have to a
releasable branch. I don't mind enting on master but it will require
more fixing. In general all of this will require some RM work of all
committers. Please ammend my little proposal if you will.
On Thu, Jul 24,
Priyanka,
what branch? Did you look into the surfire-reports to find out what
the test failures are?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Priyanka Deepala
priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
After running mvn install -P developer,systemvm
Error:Failed to execute goal
24. juli 2014 06:28 skrev Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
følgende:
I agree with mike. I think we should start 4.5 from where master is now
Also create a develop branch from master and continue future work for 4.6
there.
I am not clear on how the release branches are going to be
Hi Daan,
here is what i propose:
1. rename 'master' to 'develop’
2. branch a new 'master' from '4.4’
3. branch 'RELEASE-4.5' from the develop
4. merge 'RELEASE-4.5' to master once the release voting is done.
RELEASE-4.6 branch should be off develop as all the feature branches would be
merged
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23257/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 6:45 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Hugo
This is the snapshot of errors
---
T E S T S
---
Running com.cloud.agent.resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResourceTest
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Priyanka Deepala
priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
C:\cygwin64\home\priya\cloudstack-oss\cloudstack\core\target\surefire-reports
in this directory you should find files with stacktraces for the following:
Failed tests:
testFirewallRulesCommand(com.
That's where the 4.5-hotfixes branch comes in.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
here is what i propose:
1. rename 'master' to 'develop’
2. branch a new 'master' from '4.4’
3. branch 'RELEASE-4.5' from the develop
4. merge
24. juli 2014 08:39 skrev Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com
følgende:
Hi Daan,
here is what i propose:
1. rename 'master' to 'develop’
2. branch a new 'master' from '4.4’
3. branch 'RELEASE-4.5' from the develop
4. merge 'RELEASE-4.5' to master once the release voting is done.
ya I got the file and xml document also. The content in the file is
---
Test set: com.cloud.agent.resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResourceTest
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23879/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7127
On July 21, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/marvinLog.py, line 168
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/diff/1/?file=636742#file636742line168
Make it more abstract and see if is not aware of cfg(log_cfg), i mean
pass the logfile path, as similar to
On July 21, 2014, 1:56 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/marvinLog.py, line 168
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23735/diff/1/?file=636742#file636742line168
Make it more abstract and see if is not aware of cfg(log_cfg), i mean
pass the logfile path, as similar to
On Jul 24, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Rajani Karuturi rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
here is what i propose:
1. rename 'master' to 'develop’
2. branch a new 'master' from '4.4’
3. branch 'RELEASE-4.5' from the develop
4. merge 'RELEASE-4.5' to master once the release voting is done.
I like this
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23805/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 8:47 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alena
You can cut and paste it to the java stacktrace console in eclipse to
query the stack for the origin of the error. To determine whether it
is an error in the test or in the tested code you would need to have
your version of the checked out code.
Did you run it repeatedly and bumped into the same
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Amogh Vasekar
amogh.vase...@citrix.com wrote:
4523490d44160b054de9e943f72db1d0ce06054a
Another big coverity fix reverted Santhosh. Could you split this one
as well. A shame if all that work is getting lost this way.
--
Daan
Ya I run it several times but it is displaying the same error.I'm using
Cygwin terminal in Windows7
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
You can cut and paste it to the java stacktrace console in eclipse to
query the stack for the origin of the error.
On Jul 24, 2014, at 10:45 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Any advice on our procedure from this, Leo?
Yes, to follow all the git-flow defaults [1].
* goal is for master to become stable
* new develop which starts from master
* create with `git flow init`
* ‘abandon’ 4.4 /
on the latest master?
I run on a mac and it passes. I'll give it a try on windows later.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Priyanka Deepala
priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
Ya I run it several times but it is displaying the same error.I'm using
Cygwin terminal in Windows7
On Thu, Jul 24,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23882/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7125
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23808/#review48641
---
Ship it!
commit da55aff64f1b8255daa7999b91672bd2195bb76b
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23856/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 10:04 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
Hi Michael,
The GRE feature on Cloudstack creates OVSTunnelxxx bridges with OpenvSwitch
to serve tunnel between vms, not cloudbr. Please use ovs-vsctl utility to
check if OVSTunnel460 is exist. Remember to blacklist module bridge.
This might help:
Well, really great job Darren also Ian. Congratulations!!!
--Tuna
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Nice job! :)
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Darren's work (and Ian from last year)
On 23/07/14 4:32 AM, Silvano Nogueira Buback silv...@corp.globo.com
wrote:
@All
When I acquire new IP in shared network the same IP of vms are given
To the users.
When you create a shared network, a range of IP address need to be given.
IP addresses are allocated from this range for the VM's
+1. I'm willing to contribute.
--Tuna
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Priyanka Deepala
priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com wrote:
count me jclouds integration for more recent API features
Regards
Priyanka
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
Hi,
Yes, OVS controller auto create OVSTunnelxxx. Please use ovs-vsctl ultility
to check if OVSTunnel316 is exists.
Use this guide:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/KVM+with+OpenVSwitch
Thanks,
--Tuna
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:02 PM, cloud cloudcomp...@163.com wrote:
H Sebastien,
With 4.4.0 out and to be announced sometime today or tomorrow, Do you
still plan to bring out 4.3.1? As per the gitflow discussion we will
need to bring out a 4.4.1 by hand as well. A new way of working has to
start from master, as Leo convincingly described. I think we need a
4.4.1
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23395/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 10:45 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
now we are kind of set back by this unfortunate result of Leo's work.
new proposal:
We start using git-flow for 4.5/5.0 exclusively.
as of then we will use the workflows as describe by him [1]
4.4.x will still be released by manual RM-cherry-picking (yes
volunteer dragging his feet)
Leo, are
It makes sense to me now. +1 from me
one minor thing i would like to add is git-flow doesn’t force you to its naming
convention. You can choose any and stick to it. But, it makes sense to use the
defaults.
~Rajani
On 24-Jul-2014, at 2:52 pm, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
On
On Jul 24, 2014, at 1:19 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Leo, are you prepared to write up a how-to cwiki page?
Sure, though it would be good to get a few provisional +1s before spending a
lot of time drawing pretty pictures :)
Also, I don’t seem to have edit permissions on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23884/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Jessica Wang.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5212
Priyanka,
I just ran this on a windows machine in cygwin with latest master. It
passed the server package without problems. I am afraid you are on
your own at this point unless you can give more data.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
on the latest
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
lsimons
has access
--
Daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23885/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7178
On Jul 24, 2014, at 6:29 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H Sebastien,
With 4.4.0 out and to be announced sometime today or tomorrow, Do you
still plan to bring out 4.3.1? As per the gitflow discussion we will
need to bring out a 4.4.1 by hand as well. A new way of working
Hi All:
I would like to know the sequence the .js files called in cloudstack.
This would be help me in quickly troubleshooting the steps.
Example:
a. When enter the url in the browser (http://localhost:8080/client) we
get login screen. (I would like to the sequence in which the .js
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23856/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 12:51 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23856/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 12:54 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
As we will probably need a 4.4.1 I will spend some tine cherry picking
through 4.4-forward to get any changes we will need from there (plus
test cases)
I will remove 4.4-forward after I am done.
As per the git flow way of working any fixes on 4.4 will be done on a
per fix branch of off 4.4.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23856/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 1:44 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23856/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 1:46 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan
yes. I think 4.4-forward can be merged into 4.4 branch after 4.4.0 release,
then delete it.
2014-07-24 15:08 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
As we will probably need a 4.4.1 I will spend some tine cherry picking
through 4.4-forward to get any changes we will need from there
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23882/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 8:13 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23879/
---
(Updated July 24, 2014, 8:14 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Girish
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23885/#review48650
---
Commit 78a6d557f86db354a073090fc92ea693ee235e1f in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23885/#review48651
---
Commit 4e45b296891f71fc7991dc507dc7ae9cec6f5496 in cloudstack's
Yep...what Wei said. :)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
yes. I think 4.4-forward can be merged into 4.4 branch after 4.4.0 release,
then delete it.
2014-07-24 15:08 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com:
As we will probably need a 4.4.1 I
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23882/#review48652
---
Commit 49005b324f18e19166bcbb801bcd07609e44d8db in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23882/#review48653
---
Commit 4395308bd8b469fb02fc71d1e22f25c7d89b6dff in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23879/#review48654
---
Commit 59c77fbaa4c07e2de9578369e69f47d0e71039b8 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23879/#review48655
---
Commit ca59f01602823a6d6fe84233f3a3d3ea499efa06 in cloudstack's
git-flow with master always golden would be a good method.
Right now the development model just isn't working.
fwiw, I am not a developer, just a tinkerer with git and some bash and a
lurker :)
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Yep...what
The best thread I have read in awhile...
Good read http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:06 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Leo Simons lsim...@schubergphilis.com
wrote:
lsimons
has
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Tracy Phillips tracp...@weberize.com wrote:
Good read http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
he agrees with our thread that every work sould start with creating a
branch, doesn't he. I think we need to say that a lot of times more.
Yes, that is what he is saying. Its really the git way.
Starting a branch with the ticket-id and short description works best.
I think this is what you are looking for
https://wiki.diasporafoundation.org/Git_workflow
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
I agree, every new ticket should be on a new branch. If you have two changesets
you might ever want to merge separately, put them on separate branches.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 July 2014 17:30
To: dev
Subject:
I think I've found the cause of the resize failure. When using RBD for
primary storage the disk is not allocated before the VM starts. The resize
operation runs before the disk exists, and instead of failing completely it
just updates the database with the new disk size and returns success.
If you are on Ubuntu (and who isn't these days... right?), you can install
git-flow easily (git-completion is nice as well)
aptitude install git-flow git-completion
and git-flow command completion is nice
https://github.com/bobthecow/git-flow-completion
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:36 PM,
I believe I agree with these steps.
A couple questions:
Is 'master' simply always going to be equal to what's the most recent
version of the code that's in production?
Also, would 'develop' be for 4.6 code then and 4.5 code would go directly
into RELEASE-4.5?
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:39 AM,
Hi David,
Can I go ahead and make a configuration change to jenkins to allow built
artifacts to be downloaded?
Thanks,
Ian
On 23 July 2014 21:11, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Hi All,
For getting the simulator up fast it would be very handy to just pull down
the cloud-client-ui.war
Hey Ian,
Go ahead, just make sure only the latest artifact is saved to prevent disk
space issues.
Hugo
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 jul. 2014, at 18:53, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Hi David,
Can I go ahead and make a configuration change to jenkins to allow built
artifacts to be
What Hugo said.
You don't need permission from me.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Hi David,
Can I go ahead and make a configuration change to jenkins to allow built
artifacts to be downloaded?
Thanks,
Ian
On 23 July 2014 21:11, Ian Duffy
Hi Hugo,
Where can I submit the Brocade Plugin Usage document?
Thanks Regards,
Ritu S.
-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:15 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Ritu Sabharwal
Subject: Re: Review
Great,
then you should probably join the jclouds dev list and start testing and
contributing there.
On Jul 24, 2014, at 6:11 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu t...@apache.org wrote:
+1. I'm willing to contribute.
--Tuna
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Priyanka Deepala
priyanka.deepal...@gmail.com
Yes that’s what we did for 4.3. Merge 4.4-forward into 4.4
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 7:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL]remove 4.4-forward
Yep...what Wei said. :)
On
Great! Thanks guys.
On 24 July 2014 19:00, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
What Hugo said.
You don't need permission from me.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
Hi David,
Can I go ahead and make a configuration change to jenkins to allow built
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/317/changes
Changes:
[Daan Hoogland] Updating pom.xml version numbers for release 4.4.1-SNAPSHOT
--
[...truncated 980 lines...]
[INFO] Apache CloudStack Engine Storage Volume
Tomasz - This fix works but you should rather make the fix on the MS code
which sends the deletion command rather than on the systemvm side.
Moreover if you stop/start ssvm you would loose this jar. You have to
rebuild systemvm.iso and put it back on the host (depends on hypervisor in
use). My
Hi Nguyen,
Should I create OVSTunnelxxx ahead like cloudbr0 and cloud0 ? But how to
confirm the xxx in OVSTunnelxxx, because it's a dynamic value between the vm
creatation.
Regards
At 2014-07-24 06:08:55, Nguyen Anh Tu t...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Michael,
The GRE feature on Cloudstack
Michael,
OVSTunnelxxx is automatically created by Ovs controller. The xxx value is
generated between VLAN range you set in the beginning. For each guest
network you create, Ovs controller will add one OvsTunnel bridge.
Thanks,
--Tuna
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Michael Li
On 24-Jul-2014, at 10:25 pm, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
I believe I agree with these steps.
A couple questions:
Is 'master' simply always going to be equal to what's the most recent
version of the code that's in production?
I think so. master will always be at
Great. Well, this seems reasonable to me then.
If there are no objections or further comments, when can this be done and
who would do it?
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Rajani Karuturi
rajani.karut...@citrix.com wrote:
On 24-Jul-2014, at 10:25 pm, Mike Tutkowski
I suppose we need a formal VOTE on this?
If so, perhaps Sebastien would like to call it.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Great. Well, this seems reasonable to me then.
If there are no objections or further comments, when can this be done
Thanks Kuang,
and share BigSwitch's press release about Big Cloud Fabric.
http://www.bigswitch.com/press-releases/2014/07/22/big-switch-releases-big-cloud-fabric-the-first-bare-metal-sdn-switching
Go Chiba
E-mail:go.ch...@gmail.com
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Kuang-Ching Wang
79 matches
Mail list logo
