See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24599/#review50417
---
Commit 76cecc325fca5ead8b610c49608cb8fe8a4395c5 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/#review50421
---
Commit 9d7b85153747dfe378031455fc1231bcd6088d08 in cloudstack's
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:10 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Code freeze means that we discuss every commit, and only critical or
blocker bug fixes make it in.
Which in practice means: RM reviews quickly and cherry-picks/merges it.
--
Daan
On Aug 12, 2014, at 11:12 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
I remember we agreed to not use the -forward branches, so can we get rid of
them please?
I was reviewing someone’s patch and they had targeted
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi David,
On 13-Aug-2014, at 5:10 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Min,
For for master, we don’t have any code freeze currently, I think merge
request/reviews are not mandatory and I was confident with
Hey,
On 13-Aug-2014, at 5:12 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
I remember we agreed to not use the -forward branches, so can we get rid of
them please?
I was reviewing someone’s patch and they had targeted
On Aug. 13, 2014, 1:43 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py, line 348
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/diff/1/?file=657577#file657577line348
Make listall as keyword argument, instead of always making it to set to
true.
Are you suggesting
On Aug. 13, 2014, 8:13 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py, line 348
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/diff/1/?file=657577#file657577line348
Make listall as keyword argument, instead of always making it to set to
true.
Gaurav Aradhye
On Aug. 4, 2014, 4:35 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
tools/marvin/setup.py, line 35
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24238/diff/1/?file=650483#file650483line35
Please tying like this to as a dependency on pom.xml, may unnecessarily
lead to tight coupling with mvn logic inside of
4.4-forward should be removed. I have let it be as for a cooldown
period. It has conflicts with 4.4 and I want to have a branch per
fix/backport to merge. Leo's advice was to merge them as --no-ff. I
haven't which has resulted in no merge commits in some cases. For
single commits this is allright.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24557/#review50438
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Stephen Hoogendijk
On Aug. 12, 2014, 2:39
On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:25 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hey,
On 13-Aug-2014, at 5:12 am, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
I remember we agreed to not use the -forward branches, so can we
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/#review50440
---
Patch failed to apply on master.
error: patch failed:
If this fixes the CLVM issue in KVM environments, I want it in 4.4.
Rohit, can you expand on this?
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Min Chen min.c...@citrix.com wrote:
Completely remove the checkFormat() will cause trouble for debugging
issues later if the template format is wrong. I would
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24642/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark and Sanjay Tripathi.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/
---
(Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:36 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24642/
---
(Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:39 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/#review50441
---
test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/
---
(Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 10:44 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh
On Aug. 13, 2014, 10:43 a.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py, line 158
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/diff/2/?file=659231#file659231line158
This check is not required right? As well, i just pushed a similar
change to master, post the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/#review50443
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Santhosh Edukulla
On Aug. 13, 2014, 10:44
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24643/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7330
Hi Daan,
On 13-Aug-2014, at 12:34 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
If this fixes the CLVM issue in KVM environments, I want it in 4.4.
Not related to CLVM directly, just template/url stuff.
Rohit, can you expand on this?
Not a major bugfix, can be even viewed as a feature
Hello,
I'm not sure who has the power to change this, but in the Apache Jira the
versions for the CLOUDSTACK project are a bit out of sync with reality - we
currently incorrectly list the following as unreleased:
4.1.1
4.2.1
4.3.0
4.4.0
Also, on the downloads page
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24645/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Repository:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24644/#review50446
---
Commit 525ee4a4aada2aa90bf53b301151f20111788e65 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24643/#review50448
---
Commit b7c4259d9750cffe0cd0796b1434b39bff185b4d in cloudstack's
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24599/#review50449
---
Commit f6bde7b46bb09aa13cb35049716bd7e1fc5b7774 in cloudstack's
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7337
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24599/#review50453
---
Commit 5f893daa2cab381aef6ac59eeebe923373c4ea80 in cloudstack's
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3313/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-4770: In MacAddress skip macAddress when parsed value
is 0x00
[girish] CLOUDSTACK-7284: Fixed regression issue in
test_escalations_instances.py
On Aug. 13, 2014, 9:26 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel, the patch is failing on current master. Please submit a
git-formatted patch that would apply cleanly on master.
Sorry about that, we were working on an outdated fork. Will produce a new patch
file that applies on current master.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24648/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUSTACK-7310
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3314/
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hello,
I have experience of development in java of about three years. I want to
contribute to your organisation can you help in getting started ?
have a look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Development+101 (and
don't take it all for granted)
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Parag Goyal parag0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have experience of development in java of about three years. I want to
contribute to your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24648/
---
(Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 2:22 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24611/
---
(Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 2:43 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
thanks for replying sir i will surely take it seriously and will get back
to you after reading this :)
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
have a look at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Development+101
(and
don't take it all
On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and
design doc on the wiki.
Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any
problem with using them but a lot of
That sounds right. The only thing I can think of is if you mark the
templates as public they will be able to be seen across multiple domains.
On 8/12/14, 2:10 AM, Giri Prasad g_p...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote:
Thanks for your comments.
I have the seen the documentation, talking of adding
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24611/
---
(Updated Aug. 13, 2014, 5:08 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
Thanks for your interest in CloudStack!
Please refer to this page, as well:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/developers.html
It should help give you an idea regarding the process of submitting code to
the project.
We definitely like to work on CloudStack as a team (versus being super
isolated and
Hi guys,
I notice that in Adv zone one can dedicate a network to a single account,
trying the same in Adv+SG fails miserably.
Is there any work around for this? We have a customer willing to move into our
deployment, but want to bring his own IPs as well.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi,
I’m tested CloudStack 4.4 branch for the upcoming 4.4.1 target release, using
KVM on Ubuntu (amd64). I’m sharing my observations before creating bugs for
every issue that should be fixed.
Observations:
# Installation
- cloudstack-cli does nothing (why do we have it here or should we add a
Marcus,
May I know your response,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:37 PM
To: Marcus
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Regarding Shrinking of Volume
Hello Marcus,
I see
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Daan , please cherry-pick the fix from master to 4.4 if needed)
seems reasonable, done
--
Daan
H all,
I am working on testing 4.4.1 (4.4 branch). I am leaving for a two week
holiday with low connectivity on Saturday. Therefore I do not think I will
make/bake an RC soon and given the lack of volunteers lately, I suggest we
plan for the first week of September.
--
Daan
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
H all,
I am working on testing 4.4.1 (4.4 branch). I am leaving for a two week
holiday with low connectivity on Saturday. Therefore I do not think I will
make/bake an RC soon and given the lack of volunteers
This is how Marcus responded:
Yes, this is true. Ideally other storage maintainers/drivers would
implement it as well, but we only committed a test for shrinking clvm (over
a year ago now). I'd like to keep the test itself to run regression against
clvm, but since this test is being used now for
Hi,
Wondering who do we reach out to for hotfix* branch merge, if any.
Have a nice vacation!
Thanks,
Amogh
On 8/13/14 12:47 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
On 13-Aug-2014, at 9:15 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H all,
I am working on testing 4.4.1 (4.4
Hi,
I'll put a condition around the block that does the shrinking only in the case
of CLVM. Would the disk image type be CLVM instead of qcow2?
Thanks,
John
On 13 Aug 2014, at 20:39, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
This is how Marcus responded:
Yes, this is true.
If you're asking what I think, it would be RAW. The pool type would be
CLVM, though. This is probably a better solution, as we likely want to
grow the cases that the automated tests run. If we're testing KVM at all it
is trivial to set up an LVM volume group as a storage pool to test against.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and
design doc on the wiki.
Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any
problem with using them but a lot of
Thanks Marcus, John Mike for all the information,
FS at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Resize+Data+Volumes
claims that XenServer can shrink data volumes. Can I edit it and remove that
claim from FS? Kindly let me know,
Thank you,
Chandan.
-Original Message-
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
have a good vacation Daan,
Will continue on testing 4.4.1 :)
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw
I think there are 2 bugs here
Api level - If shrinking is not allowed say in XS it should fail fast and
say that strinking is not allowed in XS rather than going through the
resource layer and trying the operation and getting the error from XS.
Test case - I would modify the test case to expect
That's an interesting question you raise about failing fast.
On the one hand, it's nice from a usability standpoint.
On the other, it adds in additional business logic (the API layer would
then have business logic that is duplicated on the XenServer side).
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 6:40 PM,
As an example, I will note that the GUI submits requests to the management
server that it could - in theory - validate locally.
However, the GUI is (rightly) intended in CloudStack to be a thin layer on
top of the API. It purposefully avoids duplicating business logic that is
run on the backend
72 matches
Mail list logo
