See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Pdion891, we should check if we can use tags instead. Idea would be to have a
single master and rtd releases would be tags on github
-Sebastien
On 20 Aug 2014, at 02:36, Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com wrote:
Hi Radhika,
I've just created the branch 4.4 from the master branch for
Github user terbolous closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/16
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24884/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7368
Pdion891, if you amend the commit message with something like: this closes #15
the pr should get closed automatically.
On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:39 PM, pdion891 g...@git.apache.org wrote:
Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request:
I have an issue with 4.3.0.1 when i login as admin user.
CloudStack UI does not display the object unless i click around multiple
times on different sections. This is evident in environment with greater
than 500+ VMs.
Example: You login and press on Instances - that may or may not load on
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi Jayapal and thanks,
I have deleted the advanced zone for now and will attempt an upgrade to 4.4,
but if the problem comes up again I'll follow your advice.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Jayapal Reddy
Great work Seif, thanks for the slides.
I hope you stay involved with the community.
-sebastien
On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Seif Eddine Jemli seifeddineje...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
As you probably know, I have worked on this project whose goal is making
the GUI support adding
On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:28 PM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Sebastian,
I'd like to help you with Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 release that is if you need
help.
If you do need help, lets sync up via call, GTM, IRC or whatever else works.
Regards
ilya
Hi Ilya,
I have
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:03 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:28 PM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sebastian,
I'd like to help you with Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 release that is if you
need help.
If you do need help, lets sync up
Wanted to add to Sebastian's comment your work is very much appreciated.
We hope you stay with us in the future.
On 8/20/14, 12:54 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Great work Seif, thanks for the slides.
I hope you stay involved with the community.
-sebastien
On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Seif
Thanks Sangeetha for your prompt response.
Kind Regards
-Original Message-
From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2014 1:10 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Snapshot partial file creates are
I see a lot of discussion on enabling CI. Agree that it is important but CI in
itself is not going to solve the quality issue. The other important aspect is
the effectiveness of tests that get executed as part of CI. Unless there is a
proper set of automated tests (which is kept up-to-date) for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/
---
(Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 9:26 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik
Francois
I agree, but many on this list had tough time getting to 4.3. Efforts on
4.4.1 are definitely needed, but not all folks will benefit from it just
yet. Many will purposely stay 1 major version behind, for the known reasons.
4.3.1 should be an easy one to get done vs 4.4.1 which needs
Hey,
See, if you want to pick the hotfixes;
On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:21 am, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
I would love to get:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hotfix/4.3/6892
nice work seif, thumbs up :)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:00 PM, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wanted to add to Sebastian's comment your work is very much appreciated.
We hope you stay with us in the future.
On 8/20/14, 12:54 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
Great work Seif,
Hi Daan,
Sent couple of hotfix requests to Sebastien for 4.3.1, sending you the same for
4.4.1. This contains two fixes related to building and packaging:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hotfix/4.4/7038
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect,
Ilya,
I'm interesting in knowing if this is due to the UI or just slow responses
from the API.
Can you open the UI within Google Chrome and open the developer tools. If
you switch over to the networking tab you should be able to see how long
API calls are taking to respond.
On 20 August 2014
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/
---
(Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 11:38 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Koushik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/
---
(Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 11:59 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan
I've filled a bug regarding CloudStack Upgrade since 4.3.
when Upgrading to 4.3, 4.4.0 4.4.1 you have to create sysvm template
named systemvm-hypervisor-4.3
otherwise, right after the database upgrade the management-server fail to
start (restart hs well).
The idea is quite good, but it should
We can provide some help on 4.3.1 as well on testing.
Could it be possible that since 4.4.0 as been released it is not possible
to execute any database change in 4.3.1 since the db script path goes from
4.3.0 to 4.4.0 ?
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/#review51093
---
Ship it!
master - 8d0817860faa347eb738c28d30c98f549afb3096
-
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Aug 19, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath
radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of developing feature documentation for vGPU support.
Could someone please throw some light on how to go about, because there is no
4.4 branch created at
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
GitHub user bhaisaab reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12
README: trigger for test PR
This is a test PR
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/bhaisaab/cloudstack master
Alternatively
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18433/#review51097
---
Is there other patch submit for this ? then please discard this
-
Github user bhaisaab closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12#issuecomment-52781056
Sorry about the above one, I see I can tag people but don't see everyone in
the drop down list on the cloudstack repo/project.
Let me try with explicit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24892/
---
(Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 2:25 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Sheng
+1
Also each check in (defect or new feature) should be accompanied by CI based
tests as unit tests ( JUNIT tests) seem to be not so popular with CS community.
Discussions seem to be moving towards this. But some sort of enforcement is
needed at this point. Community has tried all else for
I have found the UI got more responsive after I did this:
http://theresnomon.co/2014/improving-cloudstack-ui-performance/
I don't have that many instances though.
HTH
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: ilya musayev
Hi all,
Thanks for participating. After 120 hours or 5 days, the voting result for the
proposal is as follows:
+1 (PMC / binding)
none
+1 (non binding)
6 people
0
none
-1 (PMC / binding)
1 person
-1 (non binding)
3 people
We don’t have a consensus/majority or a veto as per our bylaws; and
Ian,
If i'm not mistaken, was it you who helped with graphics optimization?
Thanks
ilya
On 8/20/14, 3:40 AM, Ian Duffy wrote:
Ilya,
I'm interesting in knowing if this is due to the UI or just slow responses
from the API.
Can you open the UI within Google Chrome and open the developer tools.
I'd like to move this discussion out of the GIT workflow thread.
Do we have any CI strategy in place or a starting point at least?
I've never worked with marvin I from the small understanding that I have
from it, it might not be the right too. I don't know.
I've spend some times recently with
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23986/
---
(Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 6:36 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark,
Bumping up this thread since another one seems to be starting over CI
Amogh
On 5/27/14 8:28 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
wrote:
Like Chip, I am very concerned with this being dependent on a single
company, even if its
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24611/
---
(Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 7:18 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep
On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and
design doc on the wiki.
Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any
problem with using them but a lot of
On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for participating. After 120 hours or 5 days, the voting result for
the proposal is as follows:
+1 (PMC / binding)
none
+1 (non binding)
6 people
0
none
-1 (PMC / binding)
1 person
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi All,
This is something I brought up a long time ago but really didn't have the
resources to get it all up and running until now. Throughout the past
year, Edison, Prasanna, Amogh, Bharat, Koushik, Talluri, and others
On Aug. 9, 2014, 3:15 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote:
Would it be better to fix/figure out why disk.getFormat() returns QCOW2 for
CLVM? We are manually fixing it here, but it seems that could cause other
problems elsewhere if getFormat doesn't work for CLVM due to some enum
elsewhere or
Thanks Daniel, I’ll test this by tomorrow.
Cheers.
On 20-Aug-2014, at 9:21 pm, Daniel Vega Simoes daniel.sim...@corp.globo.com
wrote:
On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and
design doc on the
Hi Daan and Sebastien,
Thank you for your inputs.
I did not vote as I wanted to have a positive consensus before I vote for my
own proposal just to add to the counter or satisfy my ego. I understand that
the gavel is with our PMC but I would still want us to try if we can meet half
way,
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:42 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
Rohit,
I don't see your count. At least Wido and I have voted +1 so that would be
+2 from
Wido,
Can you share your code for this?
Cheers
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
On 08/20/2014 05:46 PM, Nux! wrote:
Hi,
Excuse my ignorance, but doesn't this mean that clients can steal each
other's IPv6 at will?
Yes, they can indeed.
Lack of IPv6 is probably my biggest complaint re basic/sg zones, but just using
router adv. seems like bad security, worse than not
Hi,
On 8/20/14 12:24 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
They both had fundamental flaws, where the one was
practically useless for a week or so, and the other had major issues with
KVM, and if the BVT doesn't encounter those because it's using the
simulator I see it as a burden rather
On 20-Aug-2014, at 9:55 pm, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Maybe I need to reiterate why I reject the proposal for now, as I am the only
person vote -1(binding).
I think we all understand the pain as a release manager, even right after 4.2
release, I asked community to think about
Github user bhaisaab closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
On 20-Aug-2014, at 9:55 pm, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
On 08/20/2014 10:07 PM, Nux! wrote:
Wido,
Can you share your code for this?
Oh, I don't have any code. The setups I created have plain IPv6 without
any security grouping.
My previous e-mail was just to illustrate what would be required.
Wido
Cheers
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:17 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Sebastien Goasguenmailto:run...@gmail.com
Sent: 8/20/2014 1:47 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.orgmailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:33 PM,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:47 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 12:25 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code
quality...
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Alex Huang alex.hu...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi
There are several proposals from Citrix:
http://markmail.org/thread/c4pded5i3r22keqw
http://markmail.org/thread/xoyjw2sduenlytwm
Edison, Citrix can't make proposals. Individuals do..
Sorry, what I am trying to say is from people, who happen to be employee
from Citrix.
I know
Hello Cloudstack Devs,
It was suggested by a few people that I move this discussion from users@ to
dev@ regarding an issue I'm having with traffic shaping/network throttling.
First, the details:
Hypervisor is Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS KVM across the board
CS4.3.0 (upgraded from 4.0)
Advanced
Seif did a great job. He was very dedicated. There were many times I'd send
him an e-mail at what would be like 3 - 5 am his time (not expecting a
response for hours) and he'd respond right away (he was actually working on
the project). :)
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Sebastien Goasguen
Thanks Wido for the idea, then. :-)
I'll gladly share it with you guys should I come up with something that works.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:33 pm, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
There are several proposals from Citrix:
http://markmail.org/thread/c4pded5i3r22keqw
http://markmail.org/thread/xoyjw2sduenlytwm
Ahem ahem, what Sebastien said. Edison, we have more expectations from PMC
members :)
Thanks
Please do - we started tinkering with ipv6 ages ago, never got it to
production, tho.
On Aug 20, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Thanks Wido for the idea, then. :-)
I'll gladly share it with you guys should I come up with something that works.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:20 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Will Stevens
Subject: [DISCUSSION] CI
I'd like to move this discussion out of the GIT workflow thread.
Do we have any CI strategy in
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 3:59 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches
On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:33 pm, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Let’s keep this civil, folks.
Hi guys,
A bug was identified in newly introduce server profiles feature and the logic
of reading/writing config files and was fixed on 5.2 branch. I’ve pushed new
artifacts, please use them for voting/testing.
The updated Commit SHA is 264ddcecb1274ead2ca4879627e373ba78780117 for the same
Edison buddy,
On 21-Aug-2014, at 1:11 am, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
If you think I am not a good PMC members, you can start a vote to kick me
out, if that's something you want.
You’re taking this the wrong way, it would be immature and unprofessional to
take any severe action for
Rohit,
I was POCing the new release yesterday, did not notice this issue (also
got side tracked and could not complete testing), but will retry tomorrow.
Thanks for doing great work,
CloudMonkey is life saver,
Regards
ilya
On 8/20/14, 4:45 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi guys,
A bug was
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23610/#review51157
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- sanjeev n
On Aug. 11, 2014, 5:38 a.m.,
74 matches
Mail list logo
