Github user baiqj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/18#issuecomment-54411743
my email is linux...@gmail.com
thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Gentle reminder..
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Namita Chaudhari
namita.chaudh...@sungard.com wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24794/
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi Sailaja,
Looks like you just committed this:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=aa4fea231db714f369f0ec5203a9407c98152984
To fix the test_vm_life_cycle test, that's great but I don't think it works.
With Travis now running the tests for every commit we see
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Heya,
The simulator run reports three errors at the moment:
integration.smoke.test_vm_life_cycle.TestVMLifeCycle.test_09_expunge_vm
integration.smoke.test_network.TestReleaseIP.test_releaseIP
integration.smoke.test_network.TestDeleteAccount.test_delete_account
Can somebody with a bit of
Hi,
I have reverted the commit. I will recheck locally and commit the fix.
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 September 2014 12:53
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sailaja Mada
Subject: Test VM life Cycle
Hi Sailaja,
Looks
Thanks for looking into it,
You did not have to revert the commit, I was just pointing out that it did not
seem to have fixed the issue, and that it would be good to get in the habit of
testing in our own forks before committing to master.
-sebastien
On Sep 4, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Sailaja Mada
Daan,
I applied a new patch to hotfix/4.4-7405
Can you merge it to 4.4, it fixes metadata rewrite rules issues, bug 7405.
I already committed it to master.
thanks,
-sebastien
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25170/#review52284
---
Ship it!
applied to master with
Hi,
I'm working on a CI platforme and I want to add OS x 10.9 to Cloudstack
guest os type.
I tried with adding these lines on db:
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id, uuid, category_id, display_name) VALUES
(226, UUID(), 7, 'Apple Mac OS X 10.9 (32 bit)');
INSERT INTO `cloud`.`guest_os` (id,
On 02-Sep-2014, at 12:43 pm, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hi,
When I connect to CloudStack's VPN on a network (L2TP over IPSEC), I’m
assigned an IP like 10.1.2.2 and the DNS assigned is 10.1.2.1, but the
virtual router is not listening on this IP (VPN) for DNS queries but
GitHub user lsimons opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/15
Fix CLOUDSTACK-7476: always pass along $JAVA_HOME
On a secured environment (selinux w/ env_reset enabled in sudoers), the
runuser command that is invoked by the daemon() function does not
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25235/#review52287
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- John Dilley
On Sept. 3, 2014, 6:12 p.m.,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
merged
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
Daan,
I applied a new patch to hotfix/4.4-7405
Can you merge it to 4.4, it fixes metadata rewrite rules issues, bug 7405.
I already committed it to master.
thanks,
-sebastien
--
Daan
On Sep 1, 2014, at 4:53 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
By my possibly slightly incorrect count we now have 158 branches in our
repo. Those include master and old release branches but also a lot of
obsolete ones.
Should we clean? (+1 implied)
+1
Should an RM be
hi,
i have been working on building noredist of master for vmware,
since i'm using mvn commands and jetty for deploying cloudstack
i'm building the cloudstack using
$ mvn clean
$ mvn install -Dnoredist
deploying using $ mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run -Dnoredist
also i'm seeding the SSVM
See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/369/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24794/#review52290
---
What testing has been done?
Can you ad a unit test for the
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Punith,
You need to enable the systemvm flag in cloudstack to make sure a new
systemvm.iso is build.
mvn -Dnoredist -Psystemvm clean install
Cheers,
Hugo
On 4 sep. 2014, at 11:27, Punith S punit...@cloudbyte.com wrote:
hi,
i have been working on building noredist of master for vmware,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3456/changes
Changes:
[sailaja.mada] vGPU Service offering test automation after including review
comments
--
[...truncated 2885 lines...]
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered
thanks Hugo, it's working now :)
cheers!
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Hugo Trippaers h...@trippaers.nl wrote:
Punith,
You need to enable the systemvm flag in cloudstack to make sure a new
systemvm.iso is build.
mvn -Dnoredist -Psystemvm clean install
Cheers,
Hugo
On 4 sep.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-hotfix-trigger/30/changes
Are the tests present under test/integration/smoke/misc also getting executed?
If so please exclude them for now.
The tests under /misc folder is based on the new simulator changes to test
failures from agent layer. These tests can cause interference in other tests.
There are 2 options to make
Hey,
This is what i’m executing to run the tests:
/usr/local/bin/nosetests-2.7 -v --with-marvin
--marvin-config=setup/dev/advanced.cfg --with-xunit --xunit-file=xunit.xml -a
tags=advanced,required_hardware=false --zone=Sandbox-simulator
--hypervisor=simulator -w test/integration/smoke
Ok, in that case the tests under /misc won't get executed. Looks like there are
some other issues with the failing tests
grep required_hardware= test/integration/smoke/misc/*.py
test/integration/smoke/misc/test_deploy_vm.py:@attr(tags = ['advanced'],
required_hardware=simulator only)
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3457/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25301/#review52293
---
Gentle Reminder
- Gaurav Aradhye
On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:36 p.m.,
Koushik,
Any chance of getting a list of tests that are valid for execution against
the simulator for 4.3, 4.4 and master?
Thanks,
Ian
On 4 September 2014 13:03, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
Ok, in that case the tests under /misc won't get executed. Looks like
there are some
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25301/#review52294
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
On Sept. 3, 2014,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25301/#review52296
---
pushed to master : abfb469f910b2e16b0d439c57f5878dd5ae46526
-
For master/4.4 the command/filter specified by Hugo should work. For 4.3 check
for tests tagged with simulator.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
Sent: Thursday, 4 September 2014 5:50 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: Re: simulator run
Koushik,
Any chance of
On Sep 4, 2014, at 8:42 AM, Koushik Das koushik@citrix.com wrote:
For master/4.4 the command/filter specified by Hugo should work. For 4.3
check for tests tagged with simulator.
so in 4.3, even if I deploy an advanced zone, I should run the tests that have
tags=simulator , and not
Koushik,
Just to confirm the following should be OK for simulator usage then.
$ grep -R tags ~/projects/cloudstack/test/integration/component | grep
simulator | grep -o -e test_.*.py | sort -u
test_accounts.py
test_affinity_groups.py
test_allocation_states.py
test_cpu_domain_limits.py
1. If we want to collect all tests applicable for simulator, use nose test
command below (just add these switches to existing nosecmd --collect-only
--with-xunit --xunit-file=/tmp/x.xml )
It will dump all the tests under directory mentioned with -w switch and
required_hardware=false(signifying
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
GitHub user lsimons opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/16
CLOUDSTACK-7143: Refactoring of the systemvm build process
E-mail thread:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
H Ian,
As discussed off-list I am looking at the failure of extractIso in the
travis-ci run of the 4.4 branch. Can I tune it to give more output? Unlike
the expungeVM test, this one is not run in the simulator-singlerun so
looking at the output there doesn't help.
It seems that CLOUDSTACK-6914
One small note regarding return values, if we are running tests using nose,
then discovery, run and report is all handled by it, so in a way commands
output depends on the nose handling success, failure and error output from
tests, its nothing to do much with marvin.
Regards,
Santhosh
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/16#issuecomment-54487736
Hi Leo, thanks for the PR.
I see you've refactored the 32 and 64 bit building scripts to one which is
great!
I'll be able to test it next week and help
Github user lsimons commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/16#issuecomment-54490782
Hey Rohit, thanks for reviewing!
We actually have a new vagrant-based component test setup for the systemvm
to contribute, too; I'm working on extracting that
Folks,
I am going to send a 4.3.1 release up for vote.
People have been asking me for 4.3.1 for couple months now and it took me a
while to get to it. There is over 50 bug fixes in this release.
This is a bit new for us as 4.4.0 has already been released. I do feel that 4.3
is a solid release
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: 41c0eaa14d2f8cd5b58bca71f2254c2390cc6913
List of changes:
On Sep 4, 2014, at 10:34 AM, Santhosh Edukulla santhosh.eduku...@citrix.com
wrote:
One small note regarding return values, if we are running tests using nose,
then discovery, run and report is all handled by it, so in a way commands
output depends on the nose handling success, failure and
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/290/changes
Changes:
[kishan] CLOUDSTACK-7473: Vm migration is not supported for LXC. When host is
put in maintenance mode, stop the Vms instead of migrating
--
[...truncated 5007 lines...]
On 04-Sep-2014, at 5:04 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
I am going to send a 4.3.1 release up for vote.
People have been asking me for 4.3.1 for couple months now and it took me a
while to get to it. There is over 50 bug fixes in this release.
This is a bit new for us as 4.4.0
On 04 September 2014 15:14, Daan Hoogland [daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] wrote:
It seems that CLOUDSTACK-6914 introduced some new tagging scheme for test
and I am assuming the new tagging should exclude the test from the travis
run (makes sense and trying now). The new tagging scheme is not
As I mentioned, I'm probably the wrong person to review this fix, though I
did record the bug. If someone. If someone has domain knowledge in this
particular area please take a look.
On Sep 4, 2014 12:17 AM, Namita Chaudhari namita.chaudh...@sungardas.com
wrote:
Gentle reminder..
On Mon, Aug
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/291/
Hi Daan,
Please check and pick commits from this branch, they add db upgrade path from
4.3.1 to 4.4.1;
hotfix/4.4/upgradepath-431to441
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
Find out more about
Following up on this...
Who should I be asking to merge this into master? Should I just be pushing
my changes directly into master? I thought we wanted features and fixes to
go through the RM for the release, is this not the case.
I have the following fixes waiting for commit:
CLOUDSTACK-7468:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25289/#review52323
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Frank Zhang
On Sept. 3, 2014, 6:25 a.m.,
On Sep 4, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
Following up on this...
Who should I be asking to merge this into master? Should I just be pushing
my changes directly into master? I thought we wanted features and fixes to
go through the RM for the release, is this
yes, those are both the same fix. One is targeting the 4.4 branch for Daan
to merge. The other is targeting the master branch...
as for the tests, I can look into travis. where is this .travis.yml you
speak of? is there docs anywhere on this?
I did real tests on an actual environment with my
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-hotfix-trigger/31/
--
[...truncated 7106 lines...]
[INFO]
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.4.1-SNAPSHOT
[INFO]
I found the .travis.yml file. I still need to figure out how to use
travis, so I will have to research that...
ws
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:49
On Sept. 2, 2014, 7:01 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java, line
814
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25248/diff/1/?file=673914#file673914line814
Checking for template==null masks the whole problem.
1. Such validations
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Sept. 3, 2014, 9:32 a.m., Rajani Karuturi wrote:
client/tomcatconf/classpath.conf.in, line 37
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25289/diff/1/?file=674877#file674877line37
Can we get the JAVA_HOME from installed java instead of hardcoding it?
The path may be different for different
On Sept. 4, 2014, 5:21 p.m., Frank Zhang wrote:
Ship It!
Rayees can you please fix it and upload a second patch; don't commit on master
yet please.
- Rohit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
Rohit,
I've been using ACS 4.3.0+ with VmWare vSphere 5.1 and 5.5 for quite
sometime, I do not see any issues with downloads of templates.
Perhaps its related to NFS mount or blocking firewall. You can see all
the operations performed in vCenter Tasks. Make sure you can mount NFS
secondary
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3465/changes
Changes:
[brian.federle] Quickview: Fix alignment
--
[...truncated 5058 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-site-plugin:3.3:attach-descriptor (attach-descriptor) @
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
saw the branch, will look at merging, Rohit.
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 04-Sep-2014, at 5:04 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
I am going to send a 4.3.1 release up for vote.
People have been asking me for 4.3.1 for
Dear community,
Please help in testing 4.3.1 voting candidate that Sebastien has just shared
today. 4.3.0 was a good release, this minor release tries to fix several issues
but we need regression testing.
To get help from community folks who don’t want to build from source, I’ve
built and put
Hi Ilya,
Quick question — are you also able to download volumes using 4.3.0/ESX?
On 04-Sep-2014, at 9:14 pm, ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit,
I've been using ACS 4.3.0+ with VmWare vSphere 5.1 and 5.5 for quite
sometime, I do not see any issues with downloads of
On Sept. 4, 2014, 8:24 p.m., Chandan Purushothama wrote:
Ship It!
I reviewed the patch. I read the entire test suite to understand the Use Cases.
The Suite does refer to the wrong dictionary nat_rule instead of lb_rule.
Alex's patch should fix the issue.
- Chandan
Rohit, I see you added a path from 4.3.1 to 4.4.1 via 4.4.0. Is this going
to work? It bypasses all schema - and data upgrades from 4.3.0 to 4.4.0.
Where did these go?
thanks,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
saw the branch, will look at merging,
On Sept. 2, 2014, 7:01 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java, line
814
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25248/diff/1/?file=673914#file673914line814
Checking for template==null masks the whole problem.
1. Such validations
On Sep 4, 2014, at 4:36 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
On Sept. 2, 2014, 7:01 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
engine/orchestration/src/com/cloud/vm/VirtualMachineManagerImpl.java, line
814
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25248/diff/1/?file=673914#file673914line814
Checking
On 04-Sep-2014, at 10:59 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this the same bug but with a fix ?
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25348/
This is some other (minor) issue:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25248
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +41 779015219 |
Hi Daan,
On 04-Sep-2014, at 10:28 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit, I see you added a path from 4.3.1 to 4.4.1 via 4.4.0. Is this going
to work? It bypasses all schema - and data upgrades from 4.3.0 to 4.4.0.
Where did these go?
There is no schema change from 4.3.0 to
Ack, will be trying later tonight.
On 9/4/14, 1:22 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Dear community,
Please help in testing 4.3.1 voting candidate that Sebastien has just shared
today. 4.3.0 was a good release, this minor release tries to fix several issues
but we need regression testing.
To get help
Ok, I seemed to recall there was a schema change but it must have been
blocked/reverted or something. I did not mail my previous ;)
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Daan,
On 04-Sep-2014, at 10:28 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
On 04-Sep-2014, at 11:15 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I seemed to recall there was a schema change but it must have been
blocked/reverted or something. I did not mail my previous ;)
Yes, I asked the community about a bug that required some database schema
changes but
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-noredist/3466/changes
In short +1
Did manual smoke style testing using the source against Xenserver 6.2 with
SP1 using the devcloud database.
- Automated configuration of a basic with marvin.
- Confirm system vms came up.
- Confirm the template auto downloads.
- Confirm booting an instance using the centos template.
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
I've been running acs 4.3.0+ patches for quite sometime in large scale
environment with VmWare, but have not had a chance to try out this
specific build. Looked at commits and dont see very major changes, but
will try later today on smaller env or laptop build.
This is by far the most stable
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
87 matches
Mail list logo
