If I modify a function and make sure the modify is correct,and run mvn clean
install,it will be many kinds of strange error.
who can help me? Thanks very much
yan_5...@163.com
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 5:31 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I've created a 4.3.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
I don't know if packaging issues is relevant or not, but rpms require
openjdk 1.6 rather than 1.7, which makes the kvm agent unable to start.
Hi Erik,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 10:11 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if packaging issues is relevant or not, but rpms require
openjdk 1.6 rather than 1.7, which makes the kvm agent unable to start.
[root@cloud-lab-node3 cloudstack]# cat agent/cloudstack-agent.err
I'm going to try upgrading an existing 4.3.0 env, do we also need to upgrade
the SystemVMs?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: sebgoa run...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 10 September, 2014
Hi Ian,
One job is fixed. What happened? I would say one should not stay awake until
2AM doing cloudstack. ;) There were things I did not push, sorry by that.
Concerning the other 2 jobs, I just got the simulator environment running and
already found the reason why they are failing. In the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25290/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 2:59 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n,
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 10:11 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if packaging issues is relevant or not, but rpms require
openjdk 1.6 rather than 1.7, which makes the kvm agent unable to
Could you send the exact errors?
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: yan_5...@163.com [mailto:yan_5...@163.com]
Sent: 11 September 2014 08:35
To: dev
Subject: Problem of build
If I modify a function and make sure the modify is correct,and run mvn clean
install,it will be many
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25536/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edukulla and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25535/
---
Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n, Santhosh Edukulla, and
Hi All,
I have found that the gateway ip can get allocated to the uservms in case of
shared networks. This is a corner case and might happen accidentally.
This happens because we allow addition guest ip ranges containing the gateway
ip, while creating a shared network and internally there is
On 11-Sep-2014, at 11:10 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I'm going to try upgrading an existing 4.3.0 env, do we also need to upgrade
the SystemVMs?
Ideally, yes
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter:
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
I'll revert my initial message.
Making sure the RPMs are built with openjdk 1.6 does indeed work, so this
is a build issue.
This is however something that could bite someone though.
The spec requires openjdk 1.6 to build, but you can easily have both 1.6
and 1.7 installed and have it built with
Hello,
I've upgraded and it looks ok for now.
I have used these system VMs
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/ and added
them as systemvm-kvm-4.3 in the Templates.
I expected them to replace SystemVM Template (KVM), but they are still listed
as systemvm-kvm-4.3
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25537/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle, Ian Duffy, Jessica Wang, and
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25537/
---
(Updated Sept. 11, 2014, 1:06 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Brian
On 11-Sep-2014, at 2:06 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
The spec requires openjdk 1.6 to build, but you can easily have both 1.6
and 1.7 installed and have it built with 1.7 if that is your default java,
am I correct?
I'm not saying this should warrant the vote to fail, just want
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
On 11-Sep-2014, at 2:06 pm, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
The spec requires openjdk 1.6 to build, but you can easily have both 1.6
and 1.7 installed and have it built with 1.7 if that is your default
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hello,
I've upgraded and it looks ok for now.
I have used these system VMs
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/ and
added them as systemvm-kvm-4.3 in the Templates.
I expected them to replace
As far as I know, there is no systemvm change during upgrade from 4.3.0 to
4.3.1
2014-09-11 15:22 GMT+02:00 Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hello,
I've upgraded and it looks ok for now.
I have used these system VMs
I am presently getting 404 error when attempting to access the UI. I believe
it’s due to the version of my Tomcat. However, I am unsure what version I
should be using. As I seem to have not disabled automatic updates, as such,
many things have been updated.
Please advise,
Mo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25537/#review53031
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Wei Zhou
On 九月 11, 2014, 1:06 p.m., Ilia
On 九月 11, 2014, 1:48 p.m., Wei Zhou wrote:
Ship It!
already committed to master and 4.4 branch
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: 281c866206036235790773fbcb86edede0ac739d
Parents: 4f3de02
Author: Ilia Shakitko i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com
Authored: Thu Sep 11 12:25:09 2014 +0200
Committer:
Tomcat probably got updated and restarted after the update causing the prob.
Stop tomcat and cloudstack manger then start cloudstack manager again. You
should be all set.
On Sep 11, 2014, at 6:47 AM, mo m...@daoenix.com wrote:
I am presently getting 404 error when attempting to access the
Seems that did not work, still getting 404. :-(
On September 11, 2014 at 10:01:28 AM, Carlos Reátegui (create...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Tomcat probably got updated and restarted after the update causing the prob.
Stop tomcat and cloudstack manger then start cloudstack manager again. You
should
try to stop tomcat and then restart management server.
2014-09-11 15:47 GMT+02:00 mo m...@daoenix.com:
I am presently getting 404 error when attempting to access the UI. I
believe it’s due to the version of my Tomcat. However, I am unsure what
version I should be using. As I seem to have not
sure mike :)
and it seems in context of managed storage we are creating the SAN volume
before downloading the template from S3 to staging store; means the SAN
volume of false size will be already created before fetching the actual
virtual size of the template !
hence i'm hitting the same issue
+1 from me then, I deleted the SystemVM and nothing blew up, I can create VMs,
stop, destroy them, change security groups.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Any clues in your logs?
After stopping tomcat and CS make sure nothing is listening on 8080 before
attempting to start CS.
On Sep 11, 2014, at 7:03 AM, mo m...@daoenix.com wrote:
Seems that did not work, still getting 404. :-(
On September 11, 2014 at 10:01:28 AM, Carlos Reátegui
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Dear cloudstackers,
I am trying to install cloudstack 4.2 developer version from the following
link.
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/developer_guide.html
How to add devcloud?
downloaded and started devcloud on virtualbox,
when I login I cant see primary and secondary storage,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Except heartbleed fix.
I was merely checking if it's even poosible to do an automated upgrade.
The way i know the upgrade process we add some sql magic to check for new
systemvm templates. If that's not made for 4.3.1 it won't do much good to
add it as systemvm-hypervisor-version.
Erik
11. sep.
I have an integration test failing when trying to create a (XenServer)
storage repository.
Let me look into it for an hour or so and then I can respond back as to if
it's a code issue.
I'm thinking now it's a problem with XAPI. At first the code wasn't
compiling due to XAPI changes and now I'm
Hello CS developers,
I need help in setting up Vmware cluster in CloudStack.
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks Regards,
Ritu S.
-Original Message-
From: Ritu Sabharwal [mailto:rsabh...@brocade.com]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 4:51 PM
To: ilya musayev
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
Hi,
The management server logs will help.
Templates for launching user Vms won't be available until SSVM comes up
and downloads them to the correct location.
You may want to confirm if you are using the right systemVM template for
the (4.5?) build.
Adding Rayees who may be able to point to the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22147/#review53085
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Federle
On June 2, 2014, 5:10 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22143/#review53091
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Brian Federle
On June 2, 2014, 5:07 p.m.,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
OK, I looked into this more.
It turns out the regression test that was failing is only valid in 4.4 and
beyond, so it is not a valid test for 4.3.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
I have an integration test failing when trying to create a
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
==
commit 3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62
Author: Rohit Yadav
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
OK, I looked into this more.
It turns out the regression test that was failing is only valid in 4.4 and
beyond, so it is not a valid test for 4.3.
so can you vote ? we need your binding vote :)
On Thu, Sep
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:56 PM, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
Wei, can you test and
Based on my regression testing, I am +1.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sep 11, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
OK, I looked into this more.
It turns out the regression test that was failing is only
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Github user wilderrodrigues closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/18
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/18#issuecomment-55340207
Closing this PR because it was not working properly due to another PR,
which has alsch creation. Will openmulator and a which has also been tested on
the
GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/19
VPC and Virtual Network Managers refactor. Part of the VPC Redundant Router
work
This is a new Pull Request in order to fix the conflicts we found in the
old pull request #14 . I will
HI,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 9:56 pm, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
3a0f1550289a8a2a50b0f786821cec2e5c914e62) on 9th, September.
The systemvm template will be built based on debian 7.5.0 instead of 7.4.0
The quoted commit and
Hi Ian,
I closed the old PR and created a new one, based on a new branch containing all
the changes (including the commit from Frank Zhang for the CLOUDSTACK-6278
Baremetal Advanced Networking support with commit id
e06fa18ed2ee2ee6a417e089cf5ac6bde11d0079).
Except for the vm life cycle tests
Hi Daan,
could you create following public Jira filter to start Release-Notes for
4.3.1 and 4.4.1.
4.4.1 fixed
project = CLOUDSTACK AND type = Bug AND fixVersion = 4.4.1 AND resolution
!= \Unresolved\ ORDER BY created DESC, priority DESC, key ASC
4.4.1 known
project = CLOUDSTACK AND type = Bug
Sorry I've sent this email too fast,
Also, should we removed untested upgrade path on those Release-notes?
Thanks,
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|*
Do we have an official upgrade path for those who want to upgrade?
Erik
12. sep. 2014 01:15 skrev Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
følgende:
HI,
On 11-Sep-2014, at 9:56 pm, Wei ZHOU ustcweiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I just notice Rohit made a systemvm template change (commit
56 matches
Mail list logo
