---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26871/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2014, 6:09 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Kishan
Hello all,
I set up CS on latest master code, and I observe error while starting the
system VMs. Also, the secondary storage is shown as 0/0 on Dashboard. I can
see the error while mounting secondary storage, could not identify the
cause.
I have executed cloud-install-sys-tmplt command it
If you dashboard is showing 0/0 that means the secondary storage has not been
successfully added. What error do you get while adding secondary storage? Is
there anything else in the logs besides the stack trace you have shared?
Regards,
Devdeep
-Original Message-
From: Ashutosh
On 10/21/2014 12:36 AM, Nux! wrote:
Wido,
Alas DEBUG is on without telling me anything I can understand. Here's some
more:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=cYf8g5tg
So this is the issue:
2014-10-20 23:24:27,323 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) Seq
David,
I keep seeing commits passing to the 4.5 branch. As you are the RM I am not
reverting them. Should I? Not one of them has come from a hotfix branch for
weeks.
--
Daan
On Oct 21, 2014, at 6:32 AM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
Code reviews are great.
However, we will need to change our behavior quite a bit if code is to make
it in within a reasonable amount of time as code reviews today often don't
get done in a timely fashion.
Ok, no one says it so let me be the bad guy.
rant
Nothing will work unless the citrix department in california agrees. They
have their in-house legacy proces to change and will not unless they can
sell it easily upstream. So whether we make a grand uninfied proposal or
take small steps doesn't
On Oct 21, 2014, at 9:36 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, no one says it so let me be the bad guy.
rant
Nothing will work unless the citrix department in california agrees. They
have their in-house legacy proces to change and will not unless they can
sell it easily
H devs, as the finalisation of the release announcement is taking some
time, here is the sneak preview:
= = =
[APACHE CLOUDSTACK LOGO]
Announcing Apache™ CloudStack™ v4.4.1
Mature, easy-to-deploy Open Source Cloud computing software platform
boasts improved efficiency and performance.
Thanks Wido, I'll attempt another upgrade tonight. Cheers!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2014 08:12:23
Subject: Re: failed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26969/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7760
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26361/
---
(Updated Oct. 21, 2014, 1:02 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Frank Zhang
Rohit, I would much prefer something like Nate suggestions, at least when
working with cloudstack build from git source is easy to know using the
cloudstack version api call and rpm packages name.
Rohit, just be sure, what you are suggesting is ,as example, for branch 4.5
until 4.5.0 is GA, the
Unfortunately maven's concept of multi-module projects requires that the
sub projects define the version of the parent that they want. So it is
scattered throughout all the pom files, but there is a handy maven plugin
that can update them all for you. I think the bigger problem is around the
os
Hi,
On 21-Oct-2014, at 9:40 pm, Nate Gordon nate.gor...@appcore.com wrote:
Unfortunately maven's concept of multi-module projects requires that the
sub projects define the version of the parent that they want. So it is
scattered throughout all the pom files, but there is a handy maven plugin
Hi Daan,
Do you know if the check-in protocol for 4.5 (or rather for any branched
release) is formally documented on the Wiki somewhere?
If it's not, it's probably harder to enforce it.
Thanks!
Mike
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
David,
I keep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26871/#review57604
---
We are well past feature freeze - but I haven't started a hard code
freeze; though it is imminent.
--David
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Mike Tutkowski
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi Daan,
Do you know if the check-in protocol for 4.5 (or rather for any branched
release) is
Sorry, I am not aware of the 4.5 release policy, I'll revert my commits on 4.5.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 12:22 AM
To: dev; David Nalley
Subject: commits on 4.5
David,
I keep seeing commits passing to
So, in the past, feature freeze has been when we branch from master (in
this case, 4.5) and then people check directly into 4.5 until the RM has
called code freeze (at which point, we started using that -forward concept).
Where did we land on that? Once code freeze has passed, do people need to
I would hold off on that, Edison.
We need to make sure the policy is clear (and probably documented) first.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Edison Su edison...@citrix.com wrote:
Sorry, I am not aware of the 4.5 release policy, I'll revert my commits on
4.5.
-Original Message-
Hi Rajani,
The SSVM is up and I can see it green in XenCenter.
The systemvm.iso is available in the XenServer host. Below is the snapshot of
it.
[root@DCM-Xen-69 ~]# ls -al /opt/xensource/packages/iso/
total 160684
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Oct 15 10:49 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/35/changes
Changes:
[sudison] Revert fix kvm issue, for windows sever 2008, it will crash without
hyperv enlightment featre enabled
[sudison] Revert There are few cases that mgt server won't reponse agent's
pingcommand timely, or in KVM's case,
well, cheers for that, looks like I am going to use them tonight. :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 20 October, 2014 22:05:05
This look really good!
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
H devs, as the finalisation of the release announcement is taking some
time, here is the sneak preview:
= = =
[APACHE CLOUDSTACK LOGO]
Announcing Apache™ CloudStack™ v4.4.1
Mature,
Make sure you are using the right systemvm.iso, for this version and for
this hypervisor. You won't find scripts if scripts in sytemvm.iso havent
been injected onto ssvm
You can also login from Xencenter into ssvm and check logs as well.
On 21/10/14 10:03 AM, Ritu Sabharwal rsabh...@brocade.com
I wouldn't do that either Edison, that's up to David. I think the
practice of making hotfix branches is good in any case.
The thing that worries me most is that commits are being entered
seperately on both 45 and master instead of merging back.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Mike Tutkowski
Hi,
I want to upgrade a 4.3.1 installation to 4.4.1.
Am I still required to add the 4.4.0-6 template before in order for this thing
to succeed or has that been solved?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
yes, i am afraid you are.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
I want to upgrade a 4.3.1 installation to 4.4.1.
Am I still required to add the 4.4.0-6 template before in order for this
thing to succeed or has that been solved?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta
So, to clarify:
- I need to add systemvm-kvm-4.4 from
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/systemvm64template-4.4.0-6-kvm.qcow2.bz2
- And then add the same systemvm-kvm-4.4 (same name? won't cause problems?)
from
you will add the seond one after the db upgrade. the first one is
needed during the db upgrade. flakey, i admit.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:24 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
So, to clarify:
- I need to add systemvm-kvm-4.4 from
Roger that, flakey is ok, as long as we know the exact steps to take. :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2014 20:26:09
Since we're at it, can anyone confirm the manual systemvm hotfix is no longer
needed with 4.4.1?
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.4.0/upgrade/upgrade-4.3.html#manual-hofix
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
-
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
ual sys
that would be once you install the 4.4.1 templates, yes. remind me
often we need to upgrade the systemvm upgrade mechs
--
Daan
I read wrong. didn't think this was needed this way for the 4.4.0
templates, only for the 4.4.1 templates.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:35 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
ual sys
that would be once you install the
Right, so the steps would be:
- install 4.4.0-6 systemvm
- upgrade management/db
- install 4.4.1 systemvm
- do the manual db hotfix thing
- finally restart the systemvms so they use the 4.4.1 template
Does that cover it?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
it most certainly does
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Right, so the steps would be:
- install 4.4.0-6 systemvm
- upgrade management/db
- install 4.4.1 systemvm
- do the manual db hotfix thing
- finally restart the systemvms so they use the 4.4.1 template
Does
Ok, cheers. I'll start shortly, fingers crossed. :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 21 October, 2014 20:39:50
Subject: Re: Is the
Hi,
I just started getting this test-run error message on two of my CloudStack
dev boxes today (below).
I don't recall sign-signing a certificate, but perhaps I just forgot.
Can someone give me the context around this error?
Thanks!
Results :
Well, hit a small issue:
- added 4.4.0 systemvm - OK
- upgraded management/db - OK
- add 4.4.1 systemvm - FAIL - Cannot use reserved names for templates
So the names from the 4.4.0 and 4.4.1 systemvm names are identical and
conflict. I added the 4.4.1 systemvm as systemvm-kvm-4.4.1. Would this
So what I see has happened is as a result of the DB upgrade from 4.3.1 to 4.4.1
the systemvm-kvm-4.4 (4.4.0-6) has been marked of type System, it's not
deletable now.
Also its ID in the DB is now present as the template to use for ConsoleProxy,
SSVM and VR.
It's as if the hotfix was
Hi Nitin,
I have picked the system vm template from
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/lastStableBuild/
. This Build #132.
My XenServer is 5.6 SP2 and CS Mgmt Server is built from master.
Please verify is this is the right combination.
Thanks Regards,
I am talking about systemvm.iso and not the systemvm template
Systemvm.iso contains all our systemvm (ssvm, cpvm, routervm) agent
code(java + some scripts) that gets patched onto the systemvms once they
are deployed.
Did you build your systemvm.iso recently [1] (mvn clean install -P
Sorry got sent accidentally
[2] - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SystemVm.iso
On 21/10/14 1:45 PM, Nitin Mehta nitin.me...@citrix.com wrote:
I am talking about systemvm.iso and not the systemvm template
Systemvm.iso contains all our systemvm (ssvm, cpvm, routervm) agent
Well, that didn't go so well. Trying to hotfix the 4.4.1 systemvm resulted in
successfull SSVM and CP VMs to be restarted, however the VR upgrade went bad:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=SB3tYHZc
I'll try to downgrade to the 4.4.0 Sys VM and see if that will work.
--
Sent from the Delta
I met the error too.
It's caused by file ./server/test/resources/certs/rsa_self_signed.crt which is
expired today.
I thought we need to replace it with a new one
commit 0076307863e9155273d9e4c14282de429388c9e9
Author: Syed sah...@cloudops.com
Date: Wed Nov 6 15:08:42 2013 -0500
Squashed
Interesting...I just updated master and tried to re-build, but that test
failed again.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
I met the error too.
It's caused by file ./server/test/resources/certs/rsa_self_signed.crt
which is expired today.
I thought we
What did you update? You replace the file with you manually built certificate?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 3:16 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Certificate expired
Interesting...I just
No, sorry...I didn't clarify. I thought you were saying this was all fixed
in code, so I updated and tried to re-build the codebase:
mvn -P developer,systemvm clean install
But it failed on the same test.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
What did you
Hi. Sorry to see this thread late. Upgrading from 4.3.1 to 4.4.1 only
require one systemvm template. (The one with -7).
Refer to 4.4.1 release notes , it should point to proper urls for sysvm
too.
Le mardi 21 octobre 2014, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro a écrit :
Well, that didn't go so well. Trying to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27000/
---
Review request for cloudstack, anthony xu and Chandan Purushothama.
Bugs:
I made a new certificate, but there are lots of unit cases using different CAs;
some of them use correct file; some of them use incorrect file.
It takes time to understand what files need to be updated.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
I see - thanks.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
I made a new certificate, but there are lots of unit cases using different
CAs; some of them use correct file; some of them use incorrect file.
It takes time to understand what files need to be updated.
Hi,
Just curious...why do we have both a UUID and a GUID field in the cluster
table?
Thanks,
Mike
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
I updated three certificated and disabled 4 cases that I cannot figure out the
test logic.
The patch has been pushed to master; the build is working now.
I will send a mail to original author for those 4 disabled cases.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski
Hi Sebastien:
So I like the idea of:
1. Us putting up all inbound code for review.
2. Gating that code on a testing pass
3. Having someone else look at it before committing.
I don't think that should mean that all code that works gets an
immediate pass. I also don't think that we should have n
Thanks for that. I went back to 431, but I'll try one more time to upgrade to
4.4.1 without the 4.4.0 sysvm step.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Pierre-Luc Dion pd...@cloudops.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Thanks, Frank!
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com wrote:
I updated three certificated and disabled 4 cases that I cannot figure out
the test logic.
The patch has been pushed to master; the build is working now.
I will send a mail to original author for those
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27000/#review57716
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- anthony xu
On Oct. 21, 2014, 10:34 p.m.,
Hi,
I almost upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.4.1, everything went smoothly except the VR
upgrade (the other sysvms are fine). It will not upgrade, even if I delete it
and create another, same story:
On the agent I see:
2014-10-22 01:17:17,857 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource]
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/36/changes
Changes:
[anthony.xu] CLOUDSTACK-7761:
--
[...truncated 1828 lines...]
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 4.295 sec
Running
Hi Nux,
There is spelling mistake 'i' instead of 'I' in the file name 'createipAlias.sh'
Work around is in VR change createIpAlias.sh - createipAlias.sh
Observe the MS log once the VR entered into Running state stop the MS so that
VR won't be destroyed.
Now go to VR and change the file name.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27017/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6282
63 matches
Mail list logo
