Hi,
We still can not run cloudstack 4.4.1 + hyperv successfully. The Hyperv ssvm
still can not start successfully.
We run cloudstack 4.4.1 in centos 6.5, not added into ad. A 2012 R2 Hyperv
server is used to create hyperv vm with two Ethernet, one for cloudstack
management, and an external
I looked up the field that other people reported on the mailing list.
ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT NULL DEFAULT '1'
Can you try this in your upgraded system and restart?
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Matthew Midgett
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid
You cannot attach log to dev list. You can use pastebin to put log and post the
link here.
You don't need to have management server added to AD.
Are you able to reach to your previous state where you were able to launch
system vms but they were getting destroyed?
Are you using the US English
The cloudstack log is as follows:
2014-11-20 14:53:10,758 DEBUG [c.c.h.h.r.HypervDirectConnectResource]
(DirectAgent-3:ctx-c859f450) POST request to
https://192.168.1.78:8250/api/HypervResource/org.apache.cloudstack.storage.c
ommand.CopyCommand with contents
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/671/changes
Also attach the Hyper-V Agent logs. You can export logs to a file and paste
here.
Log around the error are also important.
From: 穆凯辉 [k...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 2:23 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: 答复: hyperv ssvm
Hi,
We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I
think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next
couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months.
I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport
I did some more investigation
In your sql dumps I found that the field was present in your 'editted'
version but not in either the 4.4.0 or the 4.4.1 versions. Did you get
this version of the db working?
In the code I found that this statement should be executed in the
430to440 upgrade step
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28279/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7951
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/672/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/673/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] schema: Add upgrade path from 4.3.2 to 4.5.0
--
[...truncated 581 lines...]
at
#TYPE System.Diagnostics.EventLogEntry#application/CloudStack Hyper-V
Agent/0
EventID,MachineName,Data,Index,Category,CategoryNumber,EntryType
,Message,Source,ReplacementStrings,InstanceId,TimeGenerated,TimeW
ritten,UserName,Site,Container
This is not a blocker, but if we have a 4.3.2, I'd be interested in making
a simple update to the SolidFire plug-in.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi,
We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and
I think we should
On 11/20/2014 10:15 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
Hi,
We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and I
think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in next
couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of months.
I’m going
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28278/
---
Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28281/
---
Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
if you are at ccceu, don't hesitate to jump in and red card to join the panel…
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/636/changes
Changes:
[Daan Hoogland] Fixed CLOUDSTACK-7937 CloudStack accepts unauthenticated LDAP
binds
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Yes but I hacked it so poorly that my networking was not right. So I rolled
back. I'm guessing that if I add that field then it might upgrade?
Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III
div Original message /divdivFrom: Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.com /divdivDate:11/20/2014
yes, it was pointed out to me that others ran into the issue and
resolved it this way. The issue that during the 4.4.0 install
something went wrong still stands:(
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Matthew Midgett
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid wrote:
Yes but I hacked it so poorly that my
I can't remember as this has been running for a year now. I do remember that I
messed the 4.3 to 4.4 upgrade and then I did a fresh install with new db and
all. At this point everything I was using worked just fine. I then read the
4.4.1 release of root disk resize and mistakenly thought that
I've rolled it back to 4.4.0 every time as as I can't leave a broken system I
will upgrade to 4.4.1 in about an 2 hours and report back.
Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® III
div Original message /divdivFrom: Daan Hoogland
daan.hoogl...@gmail.com /divdivDate:11/20/2014 3:44
On 11/19/2014 05:00 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 14:55, Michael Meskes a écrit :
Also, as a bonus question to the Debian folks, should we try
establishing a cloudstack packaging group or do we push the effort into
the java packaging group?
Cloudstack is more than welcome
Hi Alireza,
Thanks for replying.
For the issues that relate to Insufficient server capacity, there could be
multiple reasons. I can help if you can share the specific log where you get
the exception. I would advise you to check cluster level settings (cpu, memory
and storage disable
Dan and all developers that may have been involved to help get my system
upgraded I thank you for your hard work. After the sql query the upgrade went
smooth and the management servers restarted with no problems.
But now I am facing another issue that I see this in my logs and my
ssvm,console
can't wait to hair you shout success
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Matthew Midgett
clouds...@trick-solutions.com.invalid wrote:
I've rolled it back to 4.4.0 every time as as I can't leave a broken system I
will upgrade to 4.4.1 in about an 2 hours and report back.
Sent on a Sprint
Thanks Wido, I’ve cherry-picked the fix and another fix from Will (Stevens).
I’m buildling/testing it, will push on 4.3 as soon as that is done.
@Mike: If your change is not changing the schema, or adding something that
could break upgrade paths please go for it. If it’s already fixed, you can
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/637/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7822: Fixed SSL Cert Tests and relaxed chain validation
[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7952: Remove private key from SslCertResponse
(listSslCerts)
[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-3383: Fetch
Guys,
Is NetScaler 10.5 supposed to work on the 4.4.x branch? I was under to
impression there was a bug with the way ACS uses the API of 10.5,
correct? Is that bug fixed in 4.5? If its the case, can we merge back
that commit in 4.4?
Thanks!
--
Francois Gaudreault
Gestionnaire de Produit |
Hey Edison, all,
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/05bec59c1498dbcfb8a1089c86855fd3b433ea58
breaks our internal build with
+ qemu-img convert -o compat=0.10 -f raw -c -O qcow2 raw.img \
systemvmtemplate-systemvm-persistent-config-4.5.0.124-kvm.qcow2
Unknown option
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/638/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] appliance: change CLOUDSTACK version to match 4.3.1 for building
systemvmtemplate
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment
Hi,
During the CCCEU conference, I’ve been in some discussions with few people on
whether we should install/bundle xenserver tools (and vmware tools and/or
virtio-modules).
I think we can easily do this, but let’s discuss the following;
- Which version of xs-tools etc. we should install? For
CC/ dev@
This makes me happy.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 4:27 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
As an aside - those stats are for all time.
Stats over the past 365 days (per Bitergia) has #2 as Jessica Wang, #3
as Min Chen, and #7 as Alena Prokharchyk.
--David
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at
From the XenServer perspective, we have a small problem. The XenServer
tools are backward compatible, but not guaranteed forward compatible. What
that means is we'd need to include the XenServer 5.6 tools, and those have
a commercial license. The XenServer 5.6 tools also have a few bugs which
In our case, we kinda mitigate that by adding the debian package inside
the systemvm.iso file, and modifying the firstboot script to add a dkpg
command. When a VR or SSVM are brought up, the deb automatically
installs with the proper version we are using at that moment. If we ever
change the
If XenServer tools are backward compatible then we can perhaps install the
latest xs-tools (6.2)? Will that cause issue if the underlying Xen/XenServer
hypervisor version is not 6.2?
On 20-Nov-2014, at 9:12 pm, Tim Mackey tmac...@gmail.com wrote:
From the XenServer perspective, we have a
Hi,
Is there anyway i can change global custom variables in run time without
restart?
Papu
are you adding a new one or trying to change an existing one?
In the configuration table, if is_dynamic is true, you dont need a restart.
~Rajani
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:20 PM, papu bhattcharaya p...@ptrsoft.com
wrote:
Hi,
Is there anyway i can change global custom variables in run time
It's the other way around. Newer XenServer works with older tools, not the
other way.
On Nov 20, 2014 4:57 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
If XenServer tools are backward compatible then we can perhaps install the
latest xs-tools (6.2)? Will that cause issue if the underlying
Hey David,
I have added the whole dev list as I am not sure exactly what the workflow
should be for changes made to a release branch once it has been created.
My assumption is that the release manager for that branch should be
managing the commits into that branch.
I realized that one of my
Ello —
I had a few patches that were posted to review board.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25585/ https://reviews.apache.org/r/25585/
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24779/ https://reviews.apache.org/r/24779/
These patches received some comments and were updated but have otherwise been
untouched.
Hi Leo,
Our new internal build system are using ubuntu 14.04 or something like
that, which has qemu 1.x installed by default, that's why I added the
compat option in the build script, otherwise, the image build by
qemu 1.x, won't work on RHEL 6.x.
The fix would be, in the build script, check the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28279/#review62370
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Nov. 20, 2014, 9:35 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/24779/#review62374
---
seems it's already checked into master and 4.5 by Nitin? see
For RPMs, the package.sh script that sets things up for rpmbuild could do
the mvn if we wanted to keep the RPM build process from downloading.
Something similar could be done from DEB, perhaps.
The dependencies thing though will be interesting to work out. It's a bit
unfortunate, IMO, because it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25585/#review62382
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Sept. 13, 2014, 1:01 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25585/#review62381
---
checked into 4.5 and master branch.
- edison su
On Sept. 13,
Done.
-Original Message-
From: David Bierce [mailto:david.bie...@appcore.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 9:23 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Pending Reviews
Ello —
I had a few patches that were posted to review board.
https://reviews.apache.org/r/25585/
Hugely impressive, particularly with our meritocratic focus --thanks for
sharing, David! Here's hoping CloudStack Collab is going swimmingly for
everyone g
-Sally
From: Chip Childers chipchild...@apache.org
To: market...@cloudstack.apache.org market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28292/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7955
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/674/changes
Rohit,
I checked the code here
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/useraccount-refactoring
and I don't understand why we need to expose the userId parameter in the
deployVm API.
I think we should be using the userId of the logged in user always.
On Nov. 20, 2014, 6:33 p.m., edison su wrote:
seems it's already checked into master and 4.5 by Nitin? see commit:
5393387bbd4e2d3659fb0c7171e6ff347ad6a07b
This was a backport to 4.2 and 4.3
- David
---
This is an automatically
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28300/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sangeetha hariharan.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7956
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/675/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1938/
--
Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-87d
(cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/1939/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi All,
I've created a 4.4.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4
Commit: e0420a6fec738d728bc59ba65bc5e12809bde0eb
List of changes:
`CLOUDSTACK-7887
59 matches
Mail list logo
