Hi, with the latest master, while adding the first host I saw the following NPE
in ApiDBUtils.java. Any insight what might I have missed?
2014-12-03 00:32:41,694 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-8caaed15)
===START=== 10.1.13.69 -- GET
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28642/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28640/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
Bugs:
Kicking of a systemvm build of this branch on jenkins.
(Created a parameterized systemvm build job where you can specify a branch)
Cheers,
Hugo
On 3 dec. 2014, at 00:42, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
I have tested the equivalent fix in master and it is working perfectly.
The
Will,
Sounds good, i need to discuss with Daan, but i’m tempted to follow this
convention to see how it pans out.
Cheers,
Hugo
On 3 dec. 2014, at 00:44, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
I just posted a topic called: [MERGE REQUEST] hotfix/4.5-7959
This is a workflow that I am
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/2008/
--
[...truncated 17546 lines...]
3038/3102 KB
3042/3102 KB
3045/3102 KB
3049/3102 KB
3053/3102 KB
3057/3102 KB
3061/3102 KB
3065/3102 KB
3069/3102 KB
3073/3102 KB
Hey KC,
Thanks for reporting this. It was introduced by commit
0407fb334f3a79f570217f35636b47076b06d500. I’ve put Wei Zhou in CC.
I fixed it in master for now.
@Wei, can you double check my fix?
Cheers,
Hugo
On 3 dec. 2014, at 08:16, Kuang-Ching Wang kuangching.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Good idea Will,
I've few more additions;
- Don't merge bugfix to master (unless it's fixing a build etc.)
- Do reviews on Github PR, test using Travis and/or Jenkins.
- When the bugfix branch is good enough to be accepted on 4.5 (or
previous branches), merge those branch to the forward
Hi ,
Thanks for the fix.
Sorry for my mistake.
-Wei
Kind regards,
Wei Zhou
Innovation Engineer
LeaseWeb Technologies B.V.
T: +31 20 316 0235
M:
E: w.z...@tech.leaseweb.com
W: http://www.leaseweb.com
Luttenbergweg 8, 1101 EC Amsterdam, Netherlands
-Original Message-
From: Trippie
sounds good, we (@SBP) started working with reviews of the commit
diffs for master. Sounds like this is compliant with yours. I kind of
release branch 4.4 for this reason so under this condition it will
again become more workable/less effort to control the stuff.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:16 AM,
GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/50
CLOUDSTACK-8011: Upgrade maven dependencies
Changes;
- Upgrades maven-war plugin to 4.5 (faster war packaging)
- Upgrade spring framework to latest minor release
- Upgrade ehcache,
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/2009/
It looks related to commit 31db58f7204ac8bb434599ff51d794640718845c
2014-12-03 9:47 GMT+01:00 Kuang-Ching Wang kuangching.w...@gmail.com:
Hi, with the latest master, while adding the first host I saw the
following NPE in ApiDBUtils.java. Any insight what might I have missed?
2014-12-03
Hi guys,
there are quite some bugfixes in repository from 4.3.1 onwards.
Is there a plan to release 4.3.2 containing lots of these bugfixes?
I know shapeblue has published their builds including lots bugfixes, but would
you really want people to start using shapeblue’s repositories instead of
Hi folks,
I noticed today that CS system VMs have a running apache webserver
listening ports 80 and 443. I looked at its configs, and it seems to do
nothing. At least, I could not find anything interesting there. Thus, there
was just a default listening on port 80 and 443, with nothing else.
Is
Console proxy VM use web server I beleive...both 80 and 443
Not sure about SSVM though...
On 3 December 2014 at 13:23, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi folks,
I noticed today that CS system VMs have a running apache webserver
listening ports 80 and 443. I looked at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15933/#review63663
---
Niels, I see several Gluster fixes of your hand in the (4.4) code.
I was looking at the VR and SSVM.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Console proxy VM use web server I beleive...both 80 and 443
Not sure about SSVM though...
On 3 December 2014 at 13:23, Rafael Weingartner
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
wrote:
If the apache webserver is not needed in VR and SSVM it should be disabled,
in order to avoid points of failures/attacks.
I just noticed that servers because we scanned our network looking for some
server that may be forgotten without the patch for Heartbleed problem.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:30
For VR web server (port 80) is used when user data service is enabled.
For ssvm it used for required for template/iso download.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 03-Dec-2014, at 6:00 PM, Rafael Weingartner rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was looking at the VR and SSVM.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:27
Hi France,
Yes, from next week we’ll start testing 4.3.2 aggressively and start voting
round. I’ve backported 100+ bugfixes on it since 4.3.1 release/tag but need to
invest some more time to test for regressions before it can be released. I
anticipate that we can publish 4.3.2 before
It has not been merged into 4.5 yet, so kicking off a system vm build will
not be using this code yet. :)
ws
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:25 AM,
I am willing to help out in any way I can.
Cheers,
Will
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Steve Wilson steve.wil...@citrix.com
wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I'm planning to drive testing efforts on 4.3 branch from next week that
target towards 4.3.2 release, are there any more bugs especially
blockers/criticals bugs that we should backport or fix that affects
4.3.0 or 4.3.1 release? For your reference, here is a list of changes
that were
I'm all for making the password reset system more secure, as long as it
isn't required. I don't think the risk is substantial for isolated
networks, and being forced to reconfigure every template would be a big
hassle.
I do agree that SSH Key injection should also be available in the GUI.
It's a
An open source alternative is in the works by the guys at Cloudbase.it in their
cloudbase-init
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127593/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Alireza Eskandari astro.alir...@yahoo.com.INVALID
Keys are not for everyone. Passwords are still used a lot.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Carlos Reategui create...@gmail.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 3 December, 2014 05:19:07
Subject: Re: A
+1 what Nux said - I'm aware of many web developers NOT knowing what the
SSH keys are at all, and thus not using them... most of them relly on
passwords... but nice to have ssh keys for rest of us.
On 3 December 2014 at 16:52, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Keys are not for everyone. Passwords are
Passwords are most definitely a necessity, but not having SSH Keys in the
GUI at this point just doesn't make any sense.
To clarify my thoughts on the current password system: I think a re-write
would be great, but it should include an insecure/legacy option (probably
as a global setting) that
count me in. I am willing to be part of this effort.
~Rajani
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Will Stevens wstev...@cloudops.com wrote:
I am willing to help out in any way I can.
Cheers,
Will
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|*
30 matches
Mail list logo
