See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
Hi,
I would like merge the branch 'vmware-disk-controllers' into master branch.
This branch contains implementation to support Granular SCSI disk controllers
in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor.
This is specific to VMware hypervisor only. The code changes are in area of
vmware resource.
All
The use case is that I have access control lists on my SAN that I
dynamically update as a given volume is attached to or detached from a VM
in a cluster.
Let's say multiple attach commands come in for VMs in the same cluster (I
use one ACL per compute cluster). This leads to the storage framework
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/64
CLOUDSTACK-6900: Fixed if we download a volume and then migrate the same
volume, then migration fails
In findByStoreVolume method of VolumeDataStoreDao now listing only those
volumes whose
Did you verify the template you are launching the VM from is completely
downloaded and it's integrity.
-Original Message-
From: w...@landhightech.com [mailto:w...@landhightech.com]
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 3:17 AM
To: dev
Subject: Can not add a new virtual instance by a template
+1, ran some of the smoke tests that cover basic deployments of vm,
vpc, and several storage types.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
(+ users)
Hi everyone,
David has started the voting process for 4.5.0 candidate, please help test
this
Interesting. There's nothing technically wrong with that. I could
release my own thing based on current ACS and call it 'CloudMaster
11.0' If I wanted. I wonder if that maps to a 4.4 release with some
extra patches, or if they've built off of 4.5 as of RC0 or something.
It would be a little
CloudStack offers baremetal for basic zone (see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+KickStart) and
advanced zone (see
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Baremetal+Advanced+Networking+Support).
Basic zone support has been there for years, advanced
Thanks Frank, that sounds promising.
The VMware requirement kind of sucks, though. No way around it, perhaps via
some helping sys VM?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com
To:
sorry, I had send this in a private thread:
retracting this candidate due to a user report on 4.4.2 [1]
[1] http://markmail.org/message/k7pogohdtipvzccd
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
+1 from me based on basic create/start/stop tests, root resize, ssh
passwd/key
Yes, it should do it for you. Please check for the references of this
method and ensure there are other logic pieces using this.
It might help if you can you give some context of of your use case ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 4:12 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com wrote:
Hi,
I
+Min.
Unfortunately, I don’t think the framework is enhanced for all the
different kinds of resources, but it should be the way to go.
IMHO Serialization through states was/is just a hacky way of getting
around the situation and should be discontinued.
Ideally, state of a resource should reflect
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
Hi, I'm back, what ever time on my case should we doodle it?
Thanks,
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com
wrote:
It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference?
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Rohit
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tony Stevenson pct...@apache.org
Date: January 13, 2015 at 9:48:51 AM EST
To: undisclosed-recipients:;
Subject: [ NOTICE ] Service Downtime Notification - R/W git repos
Reply-To: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
Folks,
Please note than on Thursday 15th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29845/#review67830
---
Ship it!
d79837b67a481e618c8291152a9ecec299ff02dd master
doesn't
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/272/changes
Changes:
[talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8145: Adding new test to test blocker bugs and modifying
other test case to work around the bug
[talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8147: Fixed typo in test case test_redundant_router.py
[talluri] CLOUDSTACK-8149:
On Jan. 5, 2015, 1:21 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
eae9f0f0b0904a9dad025d4278b5e9b4fdf02b5e master
2dcfa157d37b9306c48f12aee54cb3b6f409277b 4.5
correcting hash for 4.5 17e19224398ac38bc9171bd157fb376361630f6d
- SrikanteswaraRao
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29620/#review67838
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- sanjeev n
On Jan. 6, 2015, 7:37 a.m.,
On Jan. 13, 2015, 11:10 a.m., sanjeev n wrote:
Ship It!
commit 9f55411295c9abc843a49f226691a6b720fb0c07
Author: Ashutosh K ashut...@clogeny.com
Date: Tue Jan 6 12:54:49 2015 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py
- sanjeev
On Jan. 13, 2015, 11:10 a.m., sanjeev n wrote:
Ship It!
sanjeev n wrote:
commit 9f55411295c9abc843a49f226691a6b720fb0c07
Author: Ashutosh K ashut...@clogeny.com
Date: Tue Jan 6 12:54:49 2015 +0530
CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py
A user reported a regression, I closed the last vote. explanation in
that thread.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
I'm a bit confused, is there any difference compared to RC 1?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1567/changes
Changes:
[sanjeev] CLOUDSTACK-8143: Corrected a test in BVT test_routers.py
--
[...truncated 1044 lines...]
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy
You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of
attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come
along if they care about these process-type issues.
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29843/#review67827
---
test/integration/component/test_VirtualRouter_alerts.py
Can anyone confirm the final time/date? Thanks.
On 13-Jan-2015, at 2:50 pm, Stephen Turner stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote:
You're right, it was the wrong word to use. I meant in terms of the number of
attendees, not the discussion. I was just trying to encourage others to come
along if
I was trying to put it off with a joke. It was not dominated by
anyone, except maybe yours truly. I hope we will keep it up and get
this to some results, soon. Sorry I can't make it this time.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Stephen Turner
stephen.tur...@citrix.com wrote:
You're right, it was
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29806/#review67826
---
Ship it!
032a00390561005dabdaa840c8ae8b36d136ccbd 4.5
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/273/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
On Jan. 5, 2015, 1:21 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
1ee41888353d87f4972e6ccb492817133805a88e master
4e7f0d277b36be91ef041fc5ae59002679abe2e1 4.5
correcting the hash for 4.5 613aa8ea28b7670b13792a638fc493b6fe8ebb21
- SrikanteswaraRao
On Jan. 13, 2015, 3:37 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
d79837b67a481e618c8291152a9ecec299ff02dd master
doesn't apply on 4.5
Applying: CLOUDSTACK-8152: Adding delay before creating snapshot/template
from root disk after writing data to disk - test_vm_passwordenabled.py
Using
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29759/#review67829
---
Ship it!
f11e5707961f7a8e18238d06848d1bce6f0172ab master
On Jan. 5, 2015, 6:50 p.m., SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
22d6565434e31a8c65953a9eb1b8bfeea1c0f1d0 master
SrikanteswaraRao Talluri wrote:
doesn't apply on 4.5
4.5 branch does not need this patch, closing the review request.
- Gaurav
With XS 6.5 released, is anyone able to comment on:
1. Does the 4.5 branch need updating to support it?
2. If the changes are so minor, will we see support in 4.3.x or 4.4.x as
well?
Do we consider this to be a feature or bug? If the code for the resource
class stays exactly the same and the
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
It's either 16:00 or 17:00 tomorrow (Wed). Anyone else got a preference?
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 13 January 2015 10:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
Can anyone confirm the
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
Hello All,
I am a cloud stack enthusiasts, and i am working with cloud stack API. The
problem i am facing is in CHANGE PASSWORD API. i have manage to
successfully change the password till now , but when special characters
are send via API the new password doesn't work .
i am using PHP to call
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/29847/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs:
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69761365
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63
CLOUDSTACK-8154: Fix typo in response name string: there is an extra 's'
Signed-off-by: René Moser m...@renemoser.net
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
I can't see/find that, have a quick url to the regression?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
To: dev dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 13 January, 2015 11:26:11
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69761669
Since, this is an API related change I'm hesitant to merge into master
without a discussion around this on dev ML. Can you start a thread on dev ML to
discuss fixing
As we're in the middle of discussing a proposal from Daan, my feeling is that
we should have it at 16:00 GMT so that he can attend and I'll sit out this
week. (Most weeks I can manage 16:00 or 17:00, but once a month I can't do
16:00).
--
Stephen Turner
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
What is the status of the Bare Metal deployment component? I'm just being asked
to install the competitorstack because of this feature and was wondering where
Cloudstack is at the moment?
Any docs about it and how can we help with it?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg
Hi dev
I found an inconsistency, call it a typo, in the API response and would
like to make an API change [1]. I saw there has been a similar change in
the past [2].
Thanks for your response.
Regards
René
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63
[2]
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69767205
I am +1 with this, looks like a typo. definitely good for master. maybe
other bug fix releases.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Yeah that's kind of annoying.
If users don't mind to put the HTTP/NFS server storing kickstart file and ISOs
on the public network, it's possible to use other hypervisors' system VM
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 11:39 AM
To:
Yep, there's a state for snapshotting.
That code (from the snippet I provided) appears to be fine.
What drew my attention is the lock on the snapshot object versus a state
transition there.
On Tuesday, January 13, 2015, Somesh Naidu somesh.na...@citrix.com wrote:
Is there a volume state that
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
Hi,
Does anyone know why we don't currently have a state and applicable
transitions in Volume.State for attaching and detaching volumes?
It seems like you'd want to, say, transition to Attaching only when you're
in the Ready state (or maybe some other states, as well).
I think right now you can
Hi,
I noticed while examining the code to take a volume snapshot that
XenserverSnapshotStrategy does the following:
SnapshotVO snapshotVO = snapshotDao
.acquireInLockTable(snapshot.getId());
if (snapshotVO == null) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException(Failed to get
States shouldn¹t be used to serialize operations on a volume. It should be
used to denote the lifecycle of the volume instead.
I think the async job manager does take care of the serialization. Which
version do you see this issue happening ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 12:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski
Github user nitmehta commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/63#issuecomment-69821830
Does this break backward compatibility ? How is this string used ? Can you
please post the old and new response for this ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Hey Mike,
State transition shouldn¹t be used for serialization. Our job framework
should do the same. If not, then its a bug.
Also, in this case locking on snapshot doesn't help, shouldn¹t it be on
the volume ?
Thanks,
-Nitin
On 13/01/15 12:34 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/275/changes
Changes:
[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8037: Require signed AuthnRequest, adds more security
[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-8155: Remove unwanted whitespaces from json response
--
[...truncated 1276
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master-simulator/1568/changes
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/276/
That is a good question, Nitin. I have not modified that logic. I just copy
and pasted it to e-mail because I was curious about the lock versus state
transition choice on the snapshot.
I don't think we would need to perform a lock on the volume, though,
because the state transition to
This is 4.6.
It seems like our state-transitioning logic is intended (as one might
expect) to protect the object in question from transitions that are invalid
given it's current state (this is what I would expect).
I do not see, say, the attach and detach operations being serialized. It
seems
Is there a volume state that reflects that it's being snapshotted? If not, how
would mgmt. server know if a subsequent request for snapshot for a volumes
arrives when one is already in progress for that same volume?
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski
Hi,
I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the
other way around.
Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they launched a 4.5 ignoring
the benefit of squishing bugs we may possibly uncover during RC period.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-singlerun/changes
That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes
on there site?
On 13 Jan 2015 23:15, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hi,
I am slightly confused. I thought Cloudstack was Citrix' Fedora, not the
other way around.
Should we care at all what Citrix does? Seems like they
I don't think they put out a release for every CloudStack release.
That they put out 4.5 before Apache did is surprising, though.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Ian Duffy i...@ianduffy.ie wrote:
That's an interesting one... Did they skip 4.4 I'm seeing no release notes
on there site?
On 13
Actually, I may have misunderstood. I.e. they say release highlights, not
that it was released:
https://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/
I take it back! :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message
yes, I find the release news from citrix official blog .
http://blogs.citrix.com/2015/01/13/citrix-cloudplatform-4-5-release-highlights/
--
Regards,
ChunFeng
-- Original --
From: Mike Tutkowskimike.tutkow...@solidfire.com;
Don't take it back. I just logged in MyCitrix and can download 4.5, it has
today's date on it.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
Date: 01/13/2015 6:54 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Hi,
I have code in my plug-in that I'd like to make sure doesn't run in
multiple threads at the same time.
Of course if there were only the possibility of one management server ever
running at a time, then I could just use synchronized.
What is the recommended CloudStack approach?
I see code
Hi,
please once check the secondary storage path for download vm is right or
nor?
Thanks,Prapul Sriram
On Thursday, 1 January 2015 2:03 PM, Mohamed Infaz
infaz...@cse.mrt.ac.lk wrote:
Hi Somesh,
Yes i was successful in stopping both the system vm's and starting them
back i
71 matches
Mail list logo
