---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31302/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sanjeev n.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8278
Looked at CLOUDSTACK-8265
In the code currently this template is internal added only for XenServer (in
CitrixHelper.java).
This is not visible in the UI. To add this it needs to be added in the guest_os
and guest_os_hypervisor table; and the upgrade path.
On Xenserver 6.5 the support is
Hi,
This mail to share a fight we had at INRIA upgrading our Cloudstack/KVM farm
from 4.2 to 4.4.2 following this documentation :
http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.2.html
It's now solved, but I would like to share, as I think :
- it could helps other
Hi,
I think it is better to go with option 2, as it makes sense to be part of one
of the states.
I believe that VMs using that storage continue to work, but what are the plans
for the operations related to the storage on those VMs like migration/HA/... ?
Thanks,
Harikrishna
On 23-Feb-2015,
All the Ubuntu versions are mapped to Other install media” for xenserver in
the mapping tables.
Since I am not sure what it could map to in older version of Xenservers it will
make sense to leave this version to as Other install media” too.
So overall the fix may give the impression of using the
I jumped the gun here, mappings are now per XenServer version. XenServer 6.5
also provide support for following oses:
• Ubuntu 14.04
• SLES 11 SP3 and SLES 12
• CentOS 5.10, 5.11, 6.5, and 7.0
• RedHat 5.10, 5.11, 6.5, and 7.0
• Oracle Linux 5.10, 5.11, 6.5, and 7.0
• Oracle UEK 6.x
Ref:
Github user K0zka commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/85#issuecomment-75564612
Hi Daan,
Yes it is OK to merge, at least it is something for fedora users to start
playing with, but let's keep the jira ticket open since the packaging of the
Anybody?, before I start to cry :(
On 21 February 2015 at 21:18, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
HI Simon,
selinux is disabled, I have just double checked.
BTW, this is what I can see in the cloudstack-agent.err log - seems like
some CEPH related issues, but not sure why would
Hello,
Marcus just fixed a nasty one for KVM where a root resize would corrupt the
underlying qcow2[1].
Together with other bugfixes people may have proposed, perhaps we can wrap up a
4.4.3?
[1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6181
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg
No, as I mentioned, I wanted to escalate visibility because it seemed
like a quick kill for the person who knows what's going on, but I'm ok
if we simply state in the release notes that the CentOS7 and Ubuntu
14.04 OS types are broken in this release. A work around is to use
'Other PV' or an older
I agree with Marcus. I suggest you start monitoring everything that's going on
around this time frame.
Maybe dump available memory, and IO (both disk and network) to a file every
minute or so, and see if you can correlate it to something in particular that
might be happening on the underlying
What's missing is that there's simply no entry in the table for KVM or
VMware. There needs to be an entry added for them.
On the KVM side the entry should probably just look like the previous
respective releases, as LibvirtComputingResource only has two states
for VM hardware, PV or non-PV, and
GitHub user NuxRo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/86
Update messages.properties
Instances ca be scaled up or down, no only up.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/NuxRo/cloudstack
It doesn't really sound like an agent problem, but some other root
problem that is causing issues for the agent. Perhaps it is specific
to the host simply because there is a particular VM that always runs
on that host and the VM itself is triggering the issue. Perhaps a
heavy logrotate or cron job
Hi David,
Thanks for replying.
On Monday 23 February 2015 07:45 PM, David Nalley wrote:
There is (to my knowledge) only a single issue I am waiting on before
kicking out RC4, and it looks like Rohit has been hacking on it last
week.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7671
I've
Hi,
I have replied to the bug mentioned on the steps. One only needs to know
the Hypervisor specific names of OS for the mappings to add the entries.
Thanks
Amogh
On 2/23/15 8:07 AM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
What's missing is that there's simply no entry in the table for KVM or
Hi,
Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found
with Coverity Scan.
1 new defect(s) introduced to cloudstack found with Coverity Scan.
1 defect(s), reported by Coverity Scan earlier, were marked fixed in the recent
build analyzed by Coverity Scan.
New
I'm largely in agreement with Adrian on this.
I think we all understand that the members of the community are largely driven
by some form of self-interest, individuals are paid to develop feature x
because their company want it enough or they do it because they want to and
their company has
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31295/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sanjeev n.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8276
Rohit, I see one blocker issue. [1] I think it's status is debatable.
It is at Anthony's name now but I doubt if he is aware of it yet. I
agree that 4.5 should be out soon.
@Marcus: Do you really want to call this a blocker
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8265
On Mon, Feb
Thx Mike, but I'm not using that storage at all for compute offerings -
just as you explained, via storage tags, I use CEPH.
But my problem is - when customer uploads a volume, then the volume is
writen to randomly choosen Primary Storage, including this old NFS, that I
don't generaly use (at
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/31296/
---
Review request for cloudstack and sanjeev n.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8277
Hi all,
4.5.0 is already too late, let's focus on releasing it soon - in the
past few weeks, we've already fixed many blockers and issues on 4.5. Are
there any blockers on 4.5 that need to be fixed?
I would request to hold back on issues that are not blockers or critical
issues, and request
Hi,
I was looking into implementing the ability to disable a storage pool for
provisioning. I could think of two ways to do it
1. CloudStack admin could add a 'disabled' tag on the storage pool. The storage
pool allocators would skip the pools for allocating volumes with the 'disabled'
tag.
On 23 Feb 2015, at 08:23, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
On Saturday 21 February 2015 07:34 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
is anyone seeing errors like this on 4.4 or even 4.3 branch:
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project - [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project
On Monday 23 February 2015 03:12 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
On 23 Feb 2015, at 08:23, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
On Saturday 21 February 2015 07:34 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
is anyone seeing errors like this on 4.4 or even 4.3 branch:
[ERROR] The build could
Interesting idea Devdeep,
does this mean, that the VMs that are already using this storage, would
continue to work? Since I guess that would be needed - as you said just
disable further provisioning on this storage.
Thanks
On 23 February 2015 at 10:31, Devdeep Singh devdeep.si...@citrix.com
On 23-Feb-2015, at 2:55 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rohit, I see one blocker issue. [1] I think it's status is debatable.
It is at Anthony's name now but I doubt if he is aware of it yet. I
agree that 4.5 should be out soon.
It looks like a blocker but lacks
yes
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:01 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
Is this fix in 4.5?
--David
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hello,
Marcus just fixed a nasty one for KVM where a root resize would corrupt the
underlying qcow2[1].
Together with other
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/simulator-4.5-singlerun/changes
For voting on new features why not use the voting capability of Jira for
new feature? at least it would give an idea if their is interest about new
features and improvement. test:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12330479 (logon required)
Regarding spec of new features they still
Hi PL,
Thanks for your feedback - appreciated that you've taken the time to read
through the emails. I may be wrong but I get the impression that Jira is
great for specific features that may result from discussion here, at meetups
or CCC but I'm not convinced that someone like me posting stuff
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-master/2251/changes
Hi Marcus, Somesh, Paul
Thanks for responding and yes, I think in some aspects I may be asking too
much but this isn't just me asking for extra/additional/new features per se.
I think it's easier if I split up the issues that I perceive to be problems
into four distinct areas. There's overlap
34 matches
Mail list logo
