Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

I agree with Remi that it makes sense to separate packaging from the actual product. Erik Den fredag 6. november 2015 skrev Remi Bergsma følgende: > Hi Paul, > > I just tried it, see the same message but also see it actually works. > Management server starts and I

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user borisroman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#issuecomment-154343137 @ustcweizhou This is only for the management server! The usage server will create it's own paths when installed. @milamberspace I'll push that change, thanks!

Re: Getting Full Volume Snapshots every day

Hello guys, Any ideas on the request? Please.. Regards, Anil. On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:48 PM, mvs babu wrote: > Hi Team, > > > We have scheduled daily volume snapshots in ACS 4.3.1 and XenServer 6.2 > SP1 as Hypervisor. ​In secondary storage, we are getting full

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9040: Use Tomcat6 for Debian p...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040#issuecomment-154340784 @borisroman Thanks! good to know it. Could you give more details how to make it work on tomcat7, so that we can discuss and look for a solution to make CS

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: debian: Updated dependencies for Packages

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/783#issuecomment-154341186 #1040 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#discussion_r44112930 --- Diff: python/lib/cloudutils/serviceConfigServer.py --- @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ def checkHostName(): bash("chown cloud.cloud

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi all, My considerations after the tests agains XenServer 6.2: We got 4 failures whilst testing against Xen62: * test_vpc_redundant.py on line 522 - AssertionError: No Master or too many master routers found 0 * test_internal_lb.py lines 712 and 576, when trying to deploy a virtual machine

Re: [RFC] Metrics views for CloudStack UI

On 11/05/2015 03:09 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > The present CloudStack UI hides most of the metrics data such as cpu, memory, > disk, network usage in inner detail views. Such information is critical to > find issues in one’s cloud, for example finding clusters where hosts are >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

I forgot to mention that for the failed rVPC test I followed the same steps manually and it worked as expected. In addition, I would like to hear from the community what should we do in terms of minor/major bugs in new features (like the rVPC). Will those be fix and added to a 4.6.1 or should

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Well, in my non-coder opinion, we should not deliver broken software, however we saw in the past fixing it all delayed release considerably. Now, how broken is that VPC? :) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Wilder

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Thanks for the clear message, Lucian. I really appreciated that. :) It’s about the Redundant VPC, not the single one - which is working pretty fine, btw! Open issues are: * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9015 * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9035 And I have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8832 : Update Nuage VSP plugin...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/801#issuecomment-154363971 @mlsorensen I agree with that third-parties can ship their own packages based on official release. It is more flexible for them. They can release new packages

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#discussion_r44116130 --- Diff: python/lib/cloudutils/serviceConfigServer.py --- @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ def checkHostName(): bash("chown cloud.cloud

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#issuecomment-154350435 @borisroman LGTM if remove line 110. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9041: Modifying template creat...

GitHub user pritisarap12 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1041 CLOUDSTACK-9041: Modifying template creation from snapshot function In create_from_snapshot function of Template class there is no parameter to accept if the template is public hence

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Well, IMHO the 2 issues are not big problems: 9015 - it sounds somewhat serious, I'll try to test these days what happens if one of the VRs crashes, that's when we'd need redundancy in a more "real" scenario, if we could get this fixed before release it'd be ideal, Remi should know more re

Re: [RFC] Metrics views for CloudStack UI

This looks really great! You've added the metrics view at the Infrastructure tab. This is nice for the platform ops. I assume the very same metrics would also be a benefit for domain-admins (say: customers). I'ld suggest to add this view somewhere below the Instances tab. cheers, - Stephan Am

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Thanks again, Lucian! I’m already working on 9015 and testing few things, hope to get it fixed soon, but not for 4.6.0. If we kan keep the good work in terms of writing/executing tests - which will help keeping Master stable - and also avoid merges that don’t follow the rule(*), we can have a

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Here is the BVT report on the RC - [cid:image001.png@01D118B0.21037340] Failed test cases: · integration.smoke.test_vpc_vpn.TestVpcRemoteAccessVpn.test_vpc_remote_access_vpn //failed due to VM deployment ·

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Thanks Raja, Attachments get striped on this mailing list, so I can’t see wha you seem to have attached. Also it would be most helpful if you could comment on the errors that you report. Do you consider them as blockers, are they related to open issues, shall we discard them ? > On Nov 6,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Raja, Concerning the LB + VPN tests, I also faced issues when ran them against XenServer 6.2. The tests is trying to deploy QCOW image based VMs on the XenHost (see my report, please). So, did you run the BVT agains Xen or KVM? Because the LB + VPN worked fine on KVM with CentOS 7.1 Thanks

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Here is the BVT report on the RC KVM Basic – 98.6% , one test failed//test case issue KVM Adv – 96.3%, four tests failed //couple due to VM deployment and couple due to test case issue XS Basic – 97.2%, two tests failed//test case issues XS Adv – 93.5%, seven tests failed //4 due to VM deployment

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8832 : Update Nuage VSP plugin...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/801#issuecomment-154401989 Great! This one is on my list to be merged once 4.6.0 is out and we start building 4.7.0. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154383035 @bhaisaab the sprites seem not to have changed. Should the sprite.png be in this change? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154396519 @DaanHoogland yes, the metrics view brings in new state icons that can be used in other places; orange for alert, migrate etc. yellow for allocated, in

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: findbugs: ! equals instead of !=

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1019#issuecomment-154403803 Did run the tests before, forgot to post them. LGTM, based on a set of tests that I run on this branch (which I rebased myself first): ```

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] CLOUDSTACK-8715: qemu-guest-agent s...

Github user wido commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1027#issuecomment-154403884 @ustcweizhou I looked at the code more closely and it looks good. However, I would still vote for having the Agent port always enabled. This saves a lot of

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.7] CLOUDSTACK-8715: qemu-guest-agent s...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1027#issuecomment-154405884 @wido thanks for your review. good to hear that. There are 5 commits by me in this PR. You can cherry-pick the commits you need to your branch and continue

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Raja, Thanks for the report. Most of these seem test-case related. For any issue you doubt this, can you please verify them manually? If it doesn’t work, please file a Jira issue (with details and stept) and set it to critical. It will then show up on the list of issues and we can discuss

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

+1 (binding) Based on tests performed with NFS/local storage and Ubuntu/CentOS based KVM hosts with both Basic/Advanced zones with/without security groups. From: Remi Bergsma Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 8:25 PM To:

Re: [RFC] Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Hi Lucian, - We are showing number of cores on the instances metrics view - We can increase the width of the container/list-view but the UI assumes 1024px to be the width and with this assumption several widgets/css rules are put in place, so it's a challenge to get it right without breaking

Re: [RFC] Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Hi Wido, Yes, we can do that but the issue here is we'll have to make a listVMs call for each zone/host row in respective metric views, such changes would cause several API requests and UI to block for longer times. The other option could be to implement new sets of APIs that aggregate data at

Re: [RFC] Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Hi Stephan, Domain admins are not shown infrastructure tab, so while they may still access metrics view for instances and volumes, they won't be able to see metrics for rest of the resources (zones, clusters, hosts and storage pool). I'll discuss and incorporate changes to allow showing volume

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Paul, the cloudstack-setup-management tool exits without error and the management server starts fine. These files are currently missing from packaging/centos7/tomcat7 but are used by the tool. [root@mgmt01 ~]# cloudstack-setup-management Starting to configure CloudStack Management Server:

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

Github user resmo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042#issuecomment-154426348 @remibergsma @ustcweizhou updated and rebased the patch with some more fixes... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042#issuecomment-154430267 @resmo @ustcweizhou This script is not used in 4.6 I'd say. There is a python class called CsDhcp.py that handles this. --- If your project is set up for it,

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

The messages plainly say that: Configure CloudStack Management Server ...[Failed] That is showing an error. It then says that it successfully rolled back. Restore Firewall ... [OK] Restore CloudStack Management Server ...[OK] You then restart it yourself manually after forcing https

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

Github user resmo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042#issuecomment-154436021 @remibergsma okay, never mind for false alarm then. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154445751 @DaanHoogland this is an admin only feature, just do a clean install and you should see this logged in as an admin --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042#issuecomment-154446597 @resmo That's all fine, glad you took the time to submit this. You may want to send the same PR against 4.5, as it is definitely relevant there. And,

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Paul, I just tried it, see the same message but also see it actually works. Management server starts and I can see the UI and work from that. I don’t see this as a blocking issue. On a more generic note, I think we need to move the packaging scripts to their own repository and iterate them

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9043 Remove \n (new line) in G...

GitHub user milamberspace opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1043 CLOUDSTACK-9043 Remove \n (new line) in German and Chinese translation The new line isn't in the original strings and are invalid character in the javascript files/ui

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user milamberspace commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154384773  @DaanHoogland see the capture ---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9040: Use Tomcat6 for Debian p...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040#issuecomment-154405274 Can someone please post some results of a successful install after this change? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

Github user resmo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042#issuecomment-154414891 @ustcweizhou seeing some more potential problems. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Raja, It seems you missed my email with the explanation concerning the VPN + LB tests. Since you replied to your own email, my questions were kicked out of the thread. Please, see below: ==> Concerning the LB + VPN tests, I also faced issues when ran them against XenServer 6.2. The

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#discussion_r44132316 --- Diff: python/lib/cloudutils/serviceConfigServer.py --- @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ def checkHostName(): bash("chown cloud.cloud

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Sorry guys. CentOS 7 install is NOT fixed in 4.6.0-RC20151104T1522. Sorry had to fly out to client in Kenya, so not been able to work on it recently. -1 [root@CentOS7ACSTest ~]# cloudstack-setup-management Starting to configure CloudStack Management Server: Configure Firewall ...[OK]

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154399546 thanks guys, missed that. Should I do anything more then just run with this change? an option some where? I am not seeing the metrix bottun in the zone view.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042#issuecomment-154404851 FYI: Started tests on this branch. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user borisroman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#issuecomment-154409103 @remibergsma @ustcweizhou As @wido pointed out, they are already created through the packager.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user borisroman commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#issuecomment-154411673 @wido @ustcweizhou Could you review again please? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-5822: keep user-added sshkeys ...

GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1044 CLOUDSTACK-5822: keep user-added sshkeys in authorized_keys For now, if we add the ssh key inside the vm (not on cloudstack UI), the sshkey will be removed if we reset the sshkey on

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Wilder, Saw your email/details... was investigating the failures and wanted to reply later. We will check your report as well. BTW, I am using XS 6.5 SP1 for testing. Initial take for couple of the failures is test code for Create VM is passing Hypervisor type as KVM for a XS/HyperV

Re: Debian packages 4.6 RC1

I've repackaged them as Remi requested. It includes my fix for Tomcat. They are packaged for Trusty from the following commit: https://github.com/borisroman/cloudstack/commit/20134ccf31e1b0114876eacf1fa081322ce9a6ac https://cloudstack.o.auroraobjects.eu/trusty/fix/cloudstack-agent_4.6.0_all.deb

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#issuecomment-154405523 FYI: Started tests on this branch. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Same tomcat6 issue? --  Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards, Boris Schrijver PCextreme B.V. http://www.pcextreme.nl/contact Tel direct: +31 6 33784542 > On November 6, 2015 at 2:49 PM Paul Angus wrote: > > > Sorry guys. CentOS 7 install is NOT fixed in

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Paul, By the looks of it it doesn't fail. It just doesn't install the non ssl config from tomcat6. Does your management server install? I think your output does NOT warrant a -1 as is! On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Boris Schrijver wrote: > Same tomcat6 issue? > > -- > >

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Sebastien, resent the report... Test case issues - we can ignore. we will should fix them anyways. VM Deployment issues - analyzing them... probably not blockers for now until we find the root cause. best, Raja -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

GitHub user resmo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042 CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DHCP host enties in /etc/dhcpentries.txt we had: 02:00:1e:07:01:53,set:10_102_92_5,10.102.92.5,songlog-1,infinite

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DH...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1042#issuecomment-154398072 LGTM btw, can you check other part except hostname in the file and fix them too? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Based on Paul’s logs, yes, it is due to the Tomcat6 packaging. It’s a shame he is too busy to elaborate or read the messages we already sent about it. +1 (binding) Cheers, Wilder > On 06 Nov 2015, at 14:55, Boris Schrijver wrote: > > Same tomcat6 issue? > > -- > >