Re: Question on compatibility matrix

Hi Sadhu, Thanks for confirming. Regards. > On 08-Mar-2016, at 5:35 AM, Suresh Sadhu wrote: > > Yes you are right " that was done because that specific version/patch was the > latest available release at the time?" it should work with previous > releases(patches) as well. > > > Regards > Sadh

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 for 4.7.x

Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1430#issuecomment-193648204 @kiwiflyer this is the log in jira: ``` 2016-02-15 10:46:21,611 INFO [utils.exception.CSExceptionErrorCode] (main:null) (logid:) Could not find exc

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Suresh, We can only get which assertion failed, but for getting the actual reason i.e. what happened in cloudstack we need to check the cloudstack log. I am uploading the logs to dropBox. Thanks, Bharat. > On 08-Mar-2016, at 11:36 AM, Suresh Anaparti > wrote: > > Hi Bharat, > > Good to

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3413

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Bharat, Good to see the list of failed and skipped ones in the report. Is it possible to add some generic comment/reason to know why these test cases are failed/skipped? Thanks, Suresh On 08/03/16 11:05 am, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: >Hi Srinivas, > >The tests get skipped because the hardwa

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Srinivas, The tests get skipped because the hardware requirement for those tests is not satisfied. I will try to add more details to the skipped tests so that people can run manually if needed. The details of the hardware used can be added, but I am thinking of publishing it in the wiki rath

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Bharat, Great job, report looks really cool. Will you be able to add few more details like the setup info (number of hosts, etc) Report indicates few tests are skipped. is this due to setup limitations? can the skipped tests be also listed so that some of us can run those specific tests (say m

RE: Question on compatibility matrix

Yes you are right " that was done because that specific version/patch was the latest available release at the time?" it should work with previous releases(patches) as well. Regards Sadhu -Original Message- From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, March 7, 20

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3412

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hmm. It probably is the right place, but I think a straight up "NO" is more likely if we go that route. It's hard to know if I should just implement 3) before we even ask in order to improve our likelihood of getting something we can work with. I will think about this and see what I can come up w

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3411

See -- [...truncated 28689 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 for 4.7.x

Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1430#issuecomment-193508523 @ustcweizhou Thanks for the advice. Maybe I can catch you on the slack channel tomorrow to discuss a little, so I better understand the logic between start and re

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

I guess the appropriate channel would be to create a jira ticket for INFRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA -- Erik On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:18 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > This is kind of what I was expecting. Do you know who I would be > contacting? The permissions required are V

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 for 4.7.x

Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1430#discussion_r55286730 --- Diff: agent/src/com/cloud/agent/Agent.java --- @@ -412,7 +412,8 @@ protected void reconnect(final Link link) { try {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Addresses CLOUDSTACK-9300 where the MySQL...

Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1428#issuecomment-193485886 @remibergsma In reference to other releases, yes this might also be broken on Ubuntu. We don't use Ubuntu, so having someone chime in who can test this would be n

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 for 4.7.x

GitHub user kiwiflyer opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1430 CLOUDSTACK-9285 for 4.7.x Per Daan's request, here is a pull request for the 4.7.x release. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.co

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

This is kind of what I was expecting. Do you know who I would be contacting? The permissions required are VERY minimal AND they have already given the 'TravisCI' application the same permissions as we need for this. How did we get the TravisCI application enabled and the permissions accepted for

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3410

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi Will, This is the main problem: there’s no one except Apache Infra with access to the Github CloudStack repo. Even committers have to push to Apache git, which is mirrored to Github. We can’t close a PR, set a label, change a title or whatever basic operation. You can ask them for a token. W

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Addresses CLOUDSTACK-9300 where the MySQL...

Github user dmabry commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1428#issuecomment-193407327 @remibergsma , We loaded up the management server with this patch and it appears to work just fine on 4.7.1 with db.ha.enable=false and db.cloud.slaves left blank.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Addresses CLOUDSTACK-9300 where the MySQL...

Github user kiwiflyer commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1428#issuecomment-193404245 Hi Remi, Yes, we tested it with HA disabled. David is going to upload the logs for reference. The mysql-connector is also referenced in the ca

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 - Agent throws an excepti...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1429#issuecomment-193384072 @kiwiflyer Thanks, have seen this as well and will try your fix when I have some time :-) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Addresses CLOUDSTACK-9300 where the MySQL...

Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1428#issuecomment-193383891 Hi @kiwiflyer, did you test this without MySQL HA as well? I doubt it will work without `mysql-connector-java`. Also, this most likely also needs to be fixed on

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3409

See -- [...truncated 28691 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Nice work Bharat. I think the combination of our two tools gives us a pretty complete solution to the problem. I have renamed my project from notify_pr to upr, short for UpdatePR. I have made an initial release available here: https://github.com/swill/upr I did a complete rewrite of the tool ov

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

Hi guys, I am also working on the similar reporting problem, here is what i did link to the report https://github.com/bvbharatk/cloud-stack/pull/1 I am thinking this is good enough for now, I want to start posting the results on each pr as shown in the above link. please give me your comments o

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9287 - Fix unique mac address ...

Github user wilderrodrigues commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1413#discussion_r55236035 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/element/VpcVirtualRouterElement.java --- @@ -559,9 +559,16 @@ public boolean applyACLItemsToPrivateGw(fina

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

Hi Hari, [ShapeBlue] Rohit Yadav Software Architect , ShapeBlue d: | s: +44 203 603 0540 | m: +91 8826230892 e: rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com | t: | w: www.shapeblue.com

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9270: UI alignment gone bad in...

Github user glennwagner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1398#issuecomment-193325954 LGTM no issues --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3408

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3407

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9285 - Agent throws an excepti...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1429#issuecomment-193220496 @kiwiflyer Simon, I'm a nag but can you recreate this PR against 4.7? We've confirmed it on 4.7 s well. I think it was introduced in 4.6 even but that release

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8611. CS waits indefinitely fo...

Github user GabrielBrascher commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/561#issuecomment-193216137 That's fair enough @DaanHoogland, I will see what I can do for this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

Hi Ahmad, Thanks. Good to see you again on the ML, after a long break. The IPMI simulation is not tied with the ACS simulator (plugin) but it’s a separate Python based tool (also an importable library). Since it’s Python based, it would be difficult to tied it with the simulator plugin. Instead

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

Hi Rohit, Thanks for the proposal and seems like a descent feature to have. I have a little concern here regarding the baremetal deployment where we use ipmi as power management interface. Are you going to use the existing ipmi util we have or do you have a separate solution for this. If it is

Build failed in Jenkins: build-systemvm64-master #770

See -- [...truncated 3356 lines...] Hit http://http.debian.net wheezy-backports/main Translation-en/DiffIndex 100% [Sources 25.4 MB] 100% [Workin

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

Hi Ilya, Thanks for the suggestions. In the UI, we can easily have a warning statement on the pop up box if host maintenance is enabled. We can also add mechanisms (for example specific APIs or zone/cluster level settings) to allow admins to disable/enable the feature at zone and cluster level

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3406

See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: Question on compatibility matrix

Thanks Pierre-Luc, in that case anyone from Citrix has any idea? On 05-Mar-2016, at 1:05 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion mailto:pd...@cloudops.com>> wrote: Hi Rohit, I can't recall where that version specific come from for ACS 4.5 with VMware, I think it was from the CloudPlatform 4.5 release notes. I nev

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: SystemVM cleanups

Github user glennwagner commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1414#issuecomment-193156160 Had a look ta your changes, PR LGTM --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj