[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1957: CLOUDSTACK-9748:VPN Users search functionalit...

Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957#discussion_r102209429 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/vpn/RemoteAccessVpnManagerImpl.java --- @@ -621,6 +627,10 @@ public void

Re: Attaching more than 14 data volumes to an instance

On 18 February 2017 at 20:51:42, Suresh Anaparti ( suresh.anapa...@accelerite.com) wrote: I checked the limits set for VMware hypervisor and observed some discrepancies. These can be either updated from the updateHypervisorCapabilities API (max_data_volumes_limit, max_hosts_per_cluster after

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1910: CLOUDSTACK-9748:VPN Users search functionality broke...

Github user Ashadeepa commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1910 @ustcweizhou : Thanks. I have made the changes. New PR : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1957: CLOUDSTACK-9748:VPN Users search functionalit...

GitHub user Ashadeepa opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1957 CLOUDSTACK-9748:VPN Users search functionality broken VPN Users search functionality broken If you try to search VPN users with it’s user name, you will not be able to search.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1861: CLOUDSTACK-9698 [VMware] Make hardcorded wait timeou...

Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1861 @borisstoyanov, thanks for running tets. I see 1 test error in the above results, this test has been failing in many other PRs as well, and doesn't seem related to changes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #859: Bug-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8882: calculate network offering u...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/859 @kishankavala i forgot about this one, guess we won't make 4.7 ;) can you appease cloudmonger? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1824: CLOUDSTACK-9657: Fixed security group ipset i...

Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1824#discussion_r102192868 --- Diff: scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmops --- @@ -232,28 +233,50 @@ def deleteFile(session, args): return txt +#using

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1881: CLOUDSTACK-9721: Remove deprecated/unused glo...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1881 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1882: CLOUDSTACK-8737: Removed the missed out-of-ba...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1882 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1897: CLOUDSTACK-9733: Concurrent volume snapshots of a VM...

Github user ramkatru commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1897 @sureshanaparti, please look into these failures. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 1...

Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102179249 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java --- @@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 1...

Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102181285 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java --- @@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 1...

Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102178630 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java --- @@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 1...

Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102184780 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java --- @@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 1...

Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102187534 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java --- @@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1953: CLOUDSTACK-9794: Unable to attach more than 1...

Github user HrWiggles commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1953#discussion_r102177792 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/VolumeApiServiceImpl.java --- @@ -2639,22 +2639,23 @@ private int getMaxDataVolumesSupported(UserVmVO vm) {

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #859: Bug-ID: CLOUDSTACK-8882: calculate network offering u...

Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/859 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 369 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=104 Failed=1 Skipped=7 _Link to logs Folder

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1771: CLOUDSTACK-9611: Dedicating a Guest VLAN rang...

Github user nitin-maharana commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771#discussion_r102173991 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java --- @@ -3085,9 +3085,10 @@ public GuestVlan

RE: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service (was: [PROPOSAL] add native container orchestration service)

Sure Daan. I'll publish the design on cwiki and share the link. -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 7:27 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [PROPOSAL] add native vm-cluster orchestration service (was:

Re: Handling of DB migrations on forks

Something like Liquibase would be nice. Hibernate might be even better. Even idempotent migrations would be a step in the right direction. Perhaps reject any migration changes that aren't INSERT IGNORE, DROP IF EXISTS, etc? I'm not sure why the DAO was originally hand-rolled. Perhaps the original

RE: Handling of DB migrations on forks

Marc-Aurele, you are totally right and people agree with you but no one seems to give this priority daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands @shapeblue -Original Message- From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier

Re: Handling of DB migrations on forks

IMO the database changes should be idempotent as much as possible with "CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW..." "DROP IF EXISTS". For other things like altering a table, it's more complicated to achieve that in pure SQL. A good call would be to integrate http://www.liquibase.org/ to manage the schema and

Re: [DISCUSS][FS] Host HA for CloudStack

See inline. Thanks, Koushik On 21/02/17, 11:47 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: Hi Koushik, Thanks for sharing your comments and questions. 1. Yes, the FS is divided into two parts - a general HA framework which makes no assumption about the type

Re: Handling of DB migrations on forks

Good strategy and I would make that not a warning but a fatal, as the resulting ACS version will probably not work. On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Then you have to create your own branch forked from 4.10.0 > > In our branch, I moved some table changes

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1878: CLOUDSTACK-9717: [VMware] RVRs have mismatching MAC ...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1878: CLOUDSTACK-9717: [VMware] RVRs have mismatching MAC ...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878 @borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1949: Automated Cloudstack bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274 9273 9...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949 @borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1949: Automated Cloudstack bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274 9273 9...

Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949 @blueorangutan test --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1878: CLOUDSTACK-9717: [VMware] RVRs have mismatching MAC ...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1878 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-519 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1949: Automated Cloudstack bugs 9277 9276 9275 9274 9273 9...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1949 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-518 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #669: Made the adding new keyboard language support easier

Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669 Added the missing license on one js file. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1779: CLOUDSTACK-9610: Disabled Host Keeps Being up status...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1779 Packaging result: ✔centos6 ✔centos7 ✔debian. JID-517 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1872: CLOUDSTACK-3223 Exception observed while creating CP...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1872 Trillian test result (tid-860) Environment: vmware-60u2 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 45192 seconds Marvin logs:

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1773: CLOUDSTACK-9607: Preventing template deletion when t...

Github user priyankparihar commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773 Hi @koushik-das @rajesh-battala , >The default value of forced is false, might cause issue on backwards compatibility. Should i make changes according to @serg38 and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1955: CLOUDSTACK-8239 Add VirtIO SCSI support for KVM host...

Github user wido commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955 Very nice indeed! I will take a look asap. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1813: CLOUDSTACK-9604: Root disk resize support for VMware...

Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813 Trillian test result (tid-864) Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7 Total time taken: 43562 seconds Marvin logs:

Re: [QUESTION] Upgrade path to JDK8

No there isn't any issue except having the bugs & fixes of the JDK you're using. You can compile it with a JDK 1.8 as long as you don't change the target bytecode version for 1.7 On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Marco, > > Good point. Is there any issue

RE: apidocs build failure

@Rajani @Rohit I missed this mail and fixed the apidoc on build.a.o yesterday. I can disable it or throw it away might we so wish daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Utrecht Utrecht 3531 VENetherlands @shapeblue -Original Message- From:

<    1   2